[1]Abe, Y., Some results concerning strongly compact cardinals, this Journal, vol. 50 (1985), pp. 874–880.

[2]Apter, A., On the least strongly compact cardinal, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 35 (1980), pp. 225–233.

[3]Apter, A., On the first n strongly compact cardinals, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 123 (1995), pp. 2229–2235.

[4]Apter, A., More on the least strongly compact cardinal, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 43 (1997), pp. 427–430.

[5]Apter, A., Patterns of compact cardinals, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 89 (1997), pp. 101–115.

[6]Apter, A., Laver indestructibility and the class of compact cardinals, this Journal, vol. 63 (1998), pp. 149–157.

[7]Apter, A., Strong compactness, measurability, and the class of supercompact cardinals, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 167 (2001), pp. 65–78.

[8]Apter, A. and Cummings, J., Identity crises and strong compactness, this Journal, vol. 65 (2000), pp. 1895–1910.

[9]Apter, A., Identity crises and strong compactness II: Strong cardinals, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 40 (2001), pp. 25–38.

[10]Apter, A. and Gitik, M., The least measurable can be strongly compact and indestructible, this Journal, vol. 63 (1998), pp. 1404–1412.

[11]Apter, A. and Hamkins, J. D., Indestructibility and the level-by-level agreement between strong compactness and supercompactness, this Journal, vol. 67 (2002), pp. 820–840.

[12]Apter, A. and Shelah, S., On the strong equality between supercompactness and strong compactness, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 349 (1997), pp. 103–128.

[13]Burgess, J., Forcing, Handbook of Mathematical Logic (Barwise, J., editor), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1977, pp. 403–452.

[14]Cummings, J., A model in which GCH holds at successors but fails at limits, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 329 (1992), pp. 1–39.

[15]Foreman, M., More saturated ideals, Cabal Seminar 79-81, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1019, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1983, pp. 1–27.

[16]Gitik, M., Changing cofinalities and the nonstationary ideal, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 56 (1986), pp. 280–314.

[17]Hamkins, J. D., Destruction orpreservation as you like it, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 91 (1998), pp. 191–229.

[18]Hamkins, J. D., Gap forcing: Generalizing the LÉvy-Solovay Theorem, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 5 (1999), pp. 264–272.

[19]Hamkins, J. D., The lottery preparation, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 101 (2000), pp. 103–146.

[20]Hamkins, J. D., Gap forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 125 (2001), pp. 237–252.

[21]Hamkins, J. D. and Woodin, W. H., Small forcing creates neither strong nor Woodin cardinals, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 128 (2000), pp. 3025–3029.

[22]Kanamori, A., The Higher Infinite, Springer-Verlag, Berlin and New York, 1994.

[23]Kimchi, Y. and Magidor, M., *The independence between the concepts of compactness and super-compactness*, circulated manuscript.

[24]Laver, R., Making the supercompactness of κ indestructible under κ-directed closed forcing, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 29 (1978), pp. 385–388.

[25]Lévy, A. and Solovay, R., Measurable cardinals and the continuum hypothesis, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 5 (1967), pp. 234–248.

[26]Magidor, M., How large is the first strongly compact cardinal?, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 10 (1976), pp. 33–57.

[27]Menas, T., On strong compactness and supercompactness, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 7 (1974), pp. 327–359.

[28]Solovay, R., Strongly compact cardinals and the GCH, Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, 1974, pp. 365–372.

[29]Solovay, R., Reinhardt, W., and Kanamori, A., Strong axioms of infinity and elementary embeddings, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 13 (1978), pp. 73–116.