We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Article purchase
Temporarily unavailable
References
REFERENCES
[A1]
[A1]Abraham, U., On forcing without the continuum hypothesis, this Journal, vol. 48 (1983), pp. 658–661.Google Scholar
[A2]
[A2]Abraham, U., On the intersection of closed unbounded sets, in preparation.Google Scholar
[A, S]
[A, S]Abraham, U. and Shelah, S., The isomorphism types of Aronszajn trees, Israel Journal of Mathematics (to appear).Google Scholar
[B1]
[B1]Baumgartner, J.E., Iterated forcing, to appear.Google Scholar
[B, T]
[B, T]Baumgartner, J.E. and Taylor, A.D., Saturation properties of ideals in generic extension. I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 270 (1982), pp. 557–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[B, H, K]
[B, H, K]Baumgartner, J.E., Harrington, L.A. and Kleinberg, E.M., Adding a closed unbounded set, this Journal, vol. 41 (1976), pp. 481–482.Google Scholar
[D, J]
[D, J]Devlin, K.J. and Johnsbråten, H., The Souslin problem, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 405, Springer, Berlin, 1974.Google Scholar
[D, K]
[D, K]Davies, P.C. and Kunen, K., Small Baire spaces (notes).Google Scholar
[F]
[F]Friedman, H., On closed sets of ordinals, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 43 (1974), pp. 190–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[F, K]
[F, K]Fleissner, W.G. and Kunen, K., Barely Baire spaces, Fundament a Mathematicae, vol. 101 (1978), pp. 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[J]
[J]Jech, T.J., Some combinatorial problems concerning uncountable cardinals, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1973), pp. 165–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[J1]
[J1]Jech, T.J., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[Jen]
[Jen]Jensen, R.B., The fine structure of the counstructible hierarchy, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 4 (1972), pp. 229–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[K]
[K]Kueker, D., Lowenheim-Skolem and interpolation theorems in infinitary languages, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 78 (1972), pp. 211–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Ma]
[Ma]Magidor, M., Reflecting stationary sets, this Journal, vol. 47 (1982), pp. 755–771.Google Scholar
[M]
[M]Mitchell, W., Aronszajn trees and the independence of the transfer property, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1972), pp. 21–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[N, D]
[N, D]Nadel, M. and Stavi, J., L∞λ-equivalence, isomorphism and potential isomorphism, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 236 (1978) pp. 51–74.Google Scholar
[S1]
[S1]Shelah, S., On successor of singular cardinals, Logic Colloquium '78, Proceedings of the Colloquium Held in Mons, August 1978 (Boffa, M., Van Dalen, D., and McAloon, K., editors), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 97, North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1979, pp. 357–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[T]Todorčević, S., Some combinatorial properties of trees, submitted to Journal of the London Mathematical Society.Google Scholar
[W]
[W]Williams, N.H., Combinatorial set theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 91, North-Holland, Amsterdam, New York, Oxford, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar