Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:23:49.541Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Herbert A. Simon. The logic of rational decision. The British journal for the philosophy of science, vol. 16 no. 63 (1965), pp. 169–186. - Herbert A. Simon. The logic of heuristic decision making. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 1–20. - Robert Binkley. Comments on H. Simon's “The logic of heuristic decision making.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 21–26. - Nuel D. Belnap Jr. Comments on H. Simon's “The logic of heuristic decision making.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 27–31. - Herbert A. Simon. Reply to comments. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 32–35. - Nicholas Rescher. Semantic foundations for the logic of preference. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 37–62. - Alan Ross Anderson. Comments on N. Rescher's “Semantic foundations for the logic of preference.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 63–70. - Robert Ackermann. Comments on N. Rescher's “Semantic foundations for the logic of preference.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 71–76. - Nicholas Rescher. Reply to comments. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 77–79. - Donald Davidson. The logical form of action sentences. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 81–95. - E. J. Lemmon. Comments on D. Davidson's “The logical form of action sentences.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 96–103. - Hector-Neri Castañeda. Comments on D. Davidson's “The logical form of action sentences.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 104–112. - Roderick M. Chisholm. Comments on D. Davidson's “The logical form of action sentences.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 113–114. - Donald Davidson. Reply to comments. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 115–120. - Georg Henrik von Wright. The logic of action—a sketch. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 121–136. - Roderick M. Chisholm. Comments on von Wright's “The logic of action.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 137–139. - John Robison. Comments on von Wright's “The logic of action.”The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 140–143. - Georg Henrik von Wright. Reply to comments. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 144–146. - Alan Ross Anderson. Appendix I. The formal analysis of normative systems. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 147–213. - Nicholas Rescher. Appendix II. Aspects of action. The logic of decision and action, edited by Nicholas Rescher, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh1967, pp. 215–219.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)