Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-lxspr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-12T06:57:39.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpolation, preservation, and pebble games

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Jon Barwise  and
Johan van Benthem
Jon Barwise
Affiliation:
Departments of Computer Science, Mathematics and Philosophy, Indiana University, Bloom Ington, IN 47405, USA E-mail: barwise@cs.indiana.edu
Johan van Benthem
Affiliation:
Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands E-mail: johan@wins.uva.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preservation and interpolation results are obtained for L∞ω and sublogics ⊆ L∞ω such that equivalence in can be characterized by suitable back-and-forth conditions on sets of partial isomorphisms.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 64 , Issue 2 , June 1999 , pp. 881 - 903
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1] Andréka, H., van Benthem, J., and Németi, I., Modal logics and bounded fragments of predicate logic, Journal of Philosophical Logic, vol. 27 (1998), pp. 217–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Baltag, A., Interpolation and preservation for pebble logics, this Journal, vol. 64 (1999), pp. 846–858 (this issue).Google Scholar
[3] Barwise, J., Back and forth through infinitary logic, Studies in model theory, (Morley, M., editor), MAA Studies in Mathematics, 1973, pp. 5–35.Google Scholar
[4] Barwise, J., Axioms for abstract model theory, Annals of Math Logic, vol. 7 (1974), pp. 221–265.Google Scholar
[5] Barwise, J., Admissible sets and structures, Springer-Verlag, 1975.Google Scholar
[6] Barwise, J., On Moschovakis closure ordinals, this Journal, vol. 42 (1977), pp. 292–298.Google Scholar
[7] Barwise, J. and Kunen, K., Hanf numbers for fragments of L∈ω , Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 10 (1971), pp. 306–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Barwise, J. and Moschovakis, Y., Global inductive definability, this Journal, vol. 43 (1978), pp. 521–534.Google Scholar
[9] Barwise, J. and Moss, L., Vicious Circles, CSLI Publications, Stanford, 1996.Google Scholar
[10] Chang, C.C., Some remarks on the model theory of infinitary languages, The syntax and semantics of infinitary languages (Barwise, J., Editor), LNM 72, Springer-Verlag, 1968.Google Scholar
[11] d. Agostino, G., van Benthem, J., Montanari, A., and Policriti, A., Modal deduction in second-order logic and set theory, Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 7 (1997), pp. 251£265.Google Scholar
[12] Dawar, A., Feasible computation through model theory, Ph.D. dissertation , University of Pennsylvania, 1993.Google Scholar
[13] Ebbinghaus, H-D and Flum, J., Finite model theory, Springer-Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
[14] Karp, C., Finite quantifier equivalence, The theory of models (Addison, J. et al., editors), N. Holland, 1965, PP. 407–412.Google Scholar
[15] Keisler, H. J., Model theory for infinitary logic, N. Holland, 1971.Google Scholar
[16] Lopez-Escobar, E., An interpolation theorem for denumerabfy long sentences, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. LVII (1965), pp. 253–272.Google Scholar
[17] Lopez-Escobar, E., On definable well-orderings, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. LVIX (1966), pp. 13–21, 299–300.Google Scholar
[18] Malitz, J., Infinitary analogues of theorems from first-order model theory, this Journal, vol. 36 (1971), pp. 216–228.Google Scholar
[19] Morley, M., Omitting classes of elements, The theory of models (Addison, J. et al., editors), N. Holland, 1965, PP. 265–273.Google Scholar
[20] Sacks, G., Saturated model theory, Benjamin, 1972.Google Scholar
[21] Sain, I., Beth's and Craig's properties via epimorphism and amalgamation in algebraic logic, Algebraic logic and universal algebra in computer science (Bergman, C. et al., editors), LNCS, Springer-Verlag, 1990, pp. 209–226.Google Scholar
[22] Scott, D., Invariant borel sets, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 56 (1964), pp. 117–128.Google Scholar
[23] van Benthem, J., Exploring logical dynamics, Studies in Logic, Language and Information, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
[24] van Benthem, J., Modal correspondence theory, Ph.D. thesis , Mathematics Institute, University of Amsterdam, 1976.Google Scholar
[25] van Benthem, J., Modal logic and classical logic, Bibliopolis, Naples, 1985.Google Scholar
[26] van Benthem, J., Language in Action, N. Holland, Amsterdam, 1991.Google Scholar
[27] van Benthem, J., Programming operations that are safe for bisimulation, Studia Logica, vol. 60 (1998), pp. 311–330.Google Scholar