No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Namba Forcing and No Good Scale
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 March 2014
Abstract
We develop a version of Namba forcing which is useful for constructing models with no good scale on ℵω. A model is produced in which holds for all finite n ≥ 1, but there is no good scale on ℵω; this strengthens a theorem of Cummings, Foreman, and Magidor [3] on the non-compactness of square.
Keywords
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2013
References
REFERENCES
[1]
Cummings, J., Notes on singular cardinal combinatorics, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 46 (2005), no. 3, pp. 251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]
Cummings, J., Foreman, M., and Magidor, M., Squares, scales, and stationary reflection, Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (2001), no. 1, pp. 35–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]
Cummings, J., Foreman, M., and Magidor, M., The non-compactness of square, this Journal, vol. 68 (2003), no. 2, pp. 637–643.Google Scholar
[4]
Cummings, J., Foreman, M., and Magidor, M., Canonical structure in the universe of set theory. I, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 129 (2004), no. 1-3, pp. 211–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]
Cummings, J., Foreman, M., and Magidor, M., Canonical structure in the universe of set theory. II, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 142 (2006), no. 1-3, pp. 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]
Foreman, M. and Magidor, M., A very weak square principle, this Journal, vol. 62 (1997), no. 1, pp. 175–196.Google Scholar
[7]
Foreman, M., Magidor, M., and Shelah, S., Martins maximum, saturated ideals, andnonregular ultrafilters. I, Annals of Mathematics. Series 2, vol. 127 (1988), no. 2, pp. 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]
Gitik, M. and Shelah, S., On the ⅈ-condition, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 48 (1984), no. 2-3, pp. 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]
Hajnal, A., Juasz, I., and Shelah, S., Splitting strongly almost disjoint families, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 295 (1986), no. 1, pp. 369–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]
Namba, K., Independence proof of (ω, ωα
)-distributivity law in complete Boolean algebras, Com-mentarii Mathematici Universitatis Sancti Pauli, vol. 19 (1970), pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
[11]
Shelah, S., Cardinal arithmetic, second ed., Oxford Logic Guides, vol. 29, The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]
Shelah, S., Proper and improper forcing, second ed., Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar