Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T23:33:12.304Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ordinal analysis of simple cases of bar recursion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

W. A. Howard*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, Chicago, Illinois 60680

Extract

The purpose of the following is to give an ordinal analysis of bar recursion of type 0 for the cases in which the bar recursion operator has type level 3 or 4. We show that the associated ordinals are the ε0th epsilon number and the first ε0-critical number, respectively. Also we analyze a restricted bar recursion operator of level 3 which provides the Gödel functional interpretation of an intuitionistic form of König's lemma. The ordinal in this case is ε0.

Let + BR0 be Gödel's theory of primitive recursive functional of finite type extended by functors Φ for bar recursion of type zero. To make bar recursion resemble transfinite recursion more closely, and thereby facilitate the ordinal analysis, we extend + BR0 to a system of terms . By Theorem 1.1a term of + BR0 which is computable by the rules of is already computable by the rules of + BR0, so it is sufficient to give an ordinal analysis of the terms of .

A term H of is said to be semi-closed if its free variables have level not exceeding 1. If, in addition, H has level not exceeding 2, then an ordinal measure for H is given by a length for one of its computation trees. We call this a computation size for H. Let F(X) be a term whose free variables have level not exceeding 2, and suppose the variable X of type 2 is the only free variable of level 2.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[H1]Howard, W., Functional interpretation of bar induction by bar recursion, Compositio Mathematica, vol. 20 (1968), pp. 107124.Google Scholar
[H2]Howard, W., Ordinal analysis of terms of finite type, this Journal, vol. 45 (1980), pp. 493504.Google Scholar
[H-K]Howard, W. and Kreisel, G., Transfinite induction and bar induction of types zero and one, the role of continuity in intuitionistic analysis, this Journal, vol. 31 (1966), pp. 325358.Google Scholar
[Sch]Schütte, K., Proof theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[Tr]Troelstra, A., Note on the fan theorem, this Journal, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 584596.Google Scholar
[Vo]Vogel, H., Über die mit dem Bar-Rekursor vom Type 0 definierbaren Ordinalzahlen, Archiv für Mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, vol. 19 (1978), pp. 139156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar