[1]Cummings, James, Foreman, Matthew, and Magidor, Menachem, Squares, scales and stationary reflection, Journal of Mathematical Logic, vol. 1 (2001), no. 1, pp. 35–98.

[2]Devlin, Keith J., Variations on ⋄, this Journal, vol. 44 (1979), no. 1, pp. 51–58.

[3]Devlin, Keith J. and Johnsbráten, Hávard, The Souslin problem, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 405, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1974.

[4]Džamonja, Mirna and Shelah, Saharon, Saturatedfilters at successors of singular, weak reflection and yet another weak club principle. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 79 (1996), no. 3, pp. 289–316.

[5]Foreman, Matthew and Magidor, Menachem, A very weak square principle, this Journal, vol. 62 (1997), no. 1, pp. 175–196.

[6]Gitik, Moti and Rinot, Assaf, The failure of diamond on a reflecting stationary set, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, To appear.

[7]Gitik, Moti and Shelah, Saharon, Less saturated ideals, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 125 (1997), no. 5, pp. 1523–1530.

[8]Gregory, John, Higher Souslin trees and the generalized continuum hypothesis, this Journal, vol. 41 (1976), no. 3, pp. 663–671.

[9]Harrington, Leo and Shelah, Saharon, Some exact equiconsistency results in set theory, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 26 (1985), no. 2, pp. 178–188.

[10]Jech, Thomas and Shelah, Saharon, Full reflection of stationary sets below ℵ_{ω}, this Journal, vol. 55 (1990), no. 2, pp. 822–830.

[11]Jensen, R. Björn, The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 4 (1972), pp. 229–308; erratum, R. Björn Jensen, *The fine structure of the constructible hierarchy, ***Annals of Pure and Applied Logic**. 4 (1972), 443, With a section by Jack Silver.

[12]Kanamori, A. and Magidor, M., The evolution of large cardinal axioms in set theory, Higher set theory (Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut, Oberwolfach, 1977), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 669, Springer, Berlin, 1978, pp. 99–275.

[13]Krueger, John, Fat sets and saturated ideals, this Journal, vol. 68 (2003), no. 3, pp. 837–845.

[14]Kunen, Kenneth, Set theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 102, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1980.

[15]Magidor, Menachem, Reflecting stationary sets, this Journal, vol. 47 (1982), no. 4, pp. 755–771 (1983).

[16]Moore, Justin Tatch, The proper forcing axiom, Prikry forcing, and the singular cardinals hypothesis, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 140 (2006), no. 1-3, pp. 128–132.

[17]Rinot, Assaf, A cofinality-preserving smallforcing may introduce a special aronszajn tree, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 48 (2009), no. 8, pp. 817–823.

[18]Shelah, Saharon, On successors of singular cardinals, Logic Colloquium '78 (Möns, 1978), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 97, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, pp. 357–380.

[19]Shelah, Saharon, Diamonds, uniformization, this Journal, vol. 49 (1984), no. 4, pp. 1022–1033.

[20]Shelah, Saharon, Advances in cardinal arithmetic, Finite and infinite combinatorics in sets and logic (Banff, AB, 1991), NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series C: Mathematics and Physics Sciences, vol. 411, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 355–383.

[21]Shelah, Saharon, Cardinal arithmetic, Oxford Logic Guides, vol. 29, The Clarendon Press Oxford University Press, New York, 1994.

[22]Shelah, Saharon, Diamonds, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 138 (2010), pp. 2151–2161.

[23]Steinhorn, Charles I. and King, James H., The uniformization property for ℵ_{2}, Israeljournal of Mathematics, vol. 36 (1980), no. 3–4, pp. 248–256.

[24]Viale, Matteo and Sharon, Assaf, Some consequences of reflection on the approachability ideal, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 362 (2010), no. 8, pp. 4201–4212.

[25]Zeman, Martin, Diamond, GCH and weak square, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 138 (2010), no. 5, pp. 1853–1859.