Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-zklqj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-31T12:07:22.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Σ½-sets of reals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Jaime I. Ihoda
Jaime I. Ihoda*
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, The Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
*
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We prove that the only implications between four notions for Σ½-sets of reals are

Information

Type
Survey/expository papers
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 53 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 636 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

[1] Baumgartner, J., Iterated forcing, Surveys in set theory (Mathias, A. R. D., editor), London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, No. 8, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.Google Scholar
[2] Baumgartner, J. and Dordal, P., Adjoining dominating functions, this Journal, vol. 50 (1985), pp. 94–101.Google Scholar
[3] Ellentuck, E., A new proof that analytic sets are Ramsey, this Journal, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 163–165.Google Scholar
[4] Galvin, F., Mycielski, J. and Solovay, R., Strong measure zero sets, Notices of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 26 (1979), p. A–280.Google Scholar
[5] Galvin, F. and Prikry, K., Borel sets and Ramsey's theorem, this Journal, vol. 38 (1973), pp. 193–198.Google Scholar
[6] Ihoda, J., Some consistency results on projective sets of reals, Israel Journal of Mathematics (submitted).Google Scholar
[7] Ihoda, J. and Shelah, S., Souslin forcing, this Journal (to appear).Google Scholar
[7a] Jech, T., Set theory, Academic Press, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
[8] Kechris, A., Measure and category in effective descriptive set theory, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 5 (1973), pp. 337–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Kechris, A., On a notion of smallness for subsets of the Baire space, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 229 (1977), pp. 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Mathias, A. R. D., Happy families, Annals of Mathematical Logic, vol. 12 (1977), pp. 59–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Miller, A, Some properties of measure and category, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 266 (1981), pp. 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Raisonnier, J. and Stern, J., The strength of measurability hypotheses, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 50 (1985), pp. 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Shelah, S., Can you take Solovay's inaccessible away, Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol. 48 (1984), pp. 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Shelah, S., Proper forcing, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 940, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Shelah, S., On cardinal invariants of the continuum, Axiomatic set theory, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 31, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1984, pp. 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Silver, J., Every analytic set is Ramsey, this Journal, vol. 35 (1970), pp. 60–64.Google Scholar
[17] Stern, J., Regularity properties of definable sets of reals, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 29 (1985), pp. 289–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar