[1]
Avigad, Jeremy
*Notes on -conservativity, ω-submodels, and collection schema*. Technical report, Carnegie Mellon Department of Philosophy, 2002.
[2]
Avigad, Jeremy, Forcing in proof theory, The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 10 (2004), no. 3, pp. 305–333.

[3]
Avigad, Jeremy and Feferman, Solomon, Gödel's functional (“Dialectica”) interpretation, Handbook ofproof theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 137, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1998, pp. 337–405.

[4]
Barwise, Jon and Schlipf, John, On recursively saturated models of arithmetic, Model theory and algebra (A memorial tribute to Abraham Robinson), Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 498, Springer, Berlin, 1975, pp. 42–55.

[5]
Bezem, Marc, Strongly majorizable functionals offinite type: a model for bar recursion containing discontinuous functionals, this Journal, vol. 50 (1985), no. 3, pp. 652–660.

[6]
Bovykin, Andrey and Weiermann, Andreas, *The strength of infinitary Ramseyan principles can be accessed by their densities*, accepted for publication in *
***Annals of Pure and Applied Logic**
, http://logic.pdmi.ras.ru/~andrey/research.html, 2005.
[7]
Cholak, Peter A., Jockusch, Carl G. Jr., and Slaman, Theodore A., On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs, this Journal, vol. 66 (2001), no. 1, pp. 1–55.

[8]
Cholak, Peter A., Jockusch, Carl G. Jr., and Slaman, Theodore A., Corrigendum to: “On the strength of Ramsey's theorem for pairs”, this Journal, vol. 74 (2009), no. 4, pp. 1438–1439.

[10]
Chong, Chitat T., Nonstandard methods in Ramsey's theorem for pairs, Computational prospects of infinity. Part II. Presented talks, Lecture Notes Series. Institute for Mathematical Sciences. National University of Singapore, vol. 15, World Scientific Publishing, Hackensack, NJ, 2008, pp. 47–57.

[11]
Friedman, Harvey, Some systems of second order arithmetic and their use, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians ( Vancouver, B.C., 1974), vol. 1, Canadian Mathematics Congress, Montreal, Quebec, 1975, pp. 235–242.

[12]
Gandy, Robin O., Proofs of strong normalization, To H. B. Curry: essays on combinatory logic, lambda calculus and formalism. Academic Press, London, 1980, pp. 457–477.

[13]
Gödel, Kurt, Über eine bisher noch nicht benützte Erweiterung des finiten Standpunktes, Dialectica, vol. 12 (1958), pp. 280–287.

[14]
Hájek, Petr and Pudlák, Pavel, Metamathematics of first-order arithmetic, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998.

[15]
Hirschfeldt, Denis R. and Shore, Richard A., Combinatorial principles weaker than Ramsey's theorem for pairs, this Journal, vol. 72 (2007), no. 1, pp. 171–206.

[16]
Hirst, Jeffry L., Combinatorics in subsystems of second order arithmetic, Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, 1987.

[17]
Howard, William A., Ordinal analysis of terms of finite type, this Journal, vol. 45 (1980), no. 3, pp. 493–504.

[18]
Howard, William A., Ordinal analysis of simple cases of bar recursion, this Journal, vol. 46 (1981), no. 1, pp. 17–30.

[19]
Jockusch, Carl and Stephan, Frank, A cohesive set which is not high, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 39 (1993), no. 4, pp. 515–530.

[20]
Jockusch, Carl and Stephan, Frank, Correction to: “A cohesive set which is not high”, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 43 (1997), no. 4, p. 569.

[21]
Jockusch, Carl G. Jr., Ramsey's theorem and recursion theory, this Journal, vol. 37 (1972), pp. 268–280.

[22]
Jockusch, Carl G. Jr. and Soare, Robert I.,
classes and degrees of theories, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 173 (1972), pp. 33–56.
[23]
Kleene, Stephen C., Countable functionals, Constructivity in mathematics: Proceedings of the colloquium held at Amsterdam, 1957 (Heyting, A., editor), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1959, pp. 81–100.

[24]
Kleene, Stephen C, Recursive functionals and quantifiers of finite types. I, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 91 (1959), pp. 1–52.

[25]
Kohlenbach, Ulrich, Effective bounds from ineffective proofs in analysis: an application of functional interpretation andmajorization, this Journal, vol. 57 (1992), no. 4, pp. 1239–1273.

[26]
Kohlenbach, Ulrich, Mathematically strong subsystems of analysis with low rate of growth ofprovably recursive functionals, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 36 (1996), no. 1, pp. 31–71.

[27]
Kohlenbach, Ulrich, Elimination of Skolem functions for monotone formulas in analysis. Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol. 37 (1998), pp. 363–390.

[28]
Kohlenbach, Ulrich, On the arithmetical content of restricted forms of comprehension, choice and general uniform boundedness, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 95 (1998), pp. 257–285.

[29]
Kohlenbach, Ulrich, On the no-counterexample interpretation, this Journal, vol. 64 (1999), no. 4, pp. 1491–1511.

[30]
Kohlenbach, Ulrich, On uniform weak Königs lemma, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 114 (2002), no. 1–3, pp. 103–116, Commemorative symposium dedicated to Anne S. Troelstra (Noordwijkerhout, 1999).

[31]
Kohlenbach, Ulrich, Higher order reverse mathematics, Reverse mathematics 2001, Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 21, Association for Symbolic Logic, La Jolla, CA, 2005, pp. 281–295.

[32]
Kohlenbach, Ulrich, Applied proof theory: Proof interpretations and their use in mathematics, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer Verlag, 2008.

[33]
Kreisel, Georg, Interpretation of analysis by means of constructive functionals of finite types, Constructivity in mathematics: Proceedings of the colloquium held at Amsterdam, 1957 (Heyting, A., editor), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1959, pp. 101–128.

[34]
Kreuzer, Alexander and Kohlenbach, Ulrich, Ramsey's theorem for pairs and provably recursive functions, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 50 (2009), no. 4, pp. 427–444 (2010).

[35]
Kreuzer, Alexander P., Der Satz von Ramsey für Paare und beweisbar rekursive Funktionen, Diploma Thesis, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 2009.

[36]
Kreuzer, Alexander P., The cohesive principle and the Bolzano-Weierstraß principle, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 57 (2011), no. 3, pp. 292–298.

[37]
Kreuzer, Alexander P., Primitive recursion and the chain antichain principle, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 53 (2012), no. 2, pp. 245–265.

[38]
Luckhardt, Horst, Extensional Gödel functional interpretation. A consistency proof of classical analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 306, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973.

[39]
Normann, Dag, Recursion on the countable functionals, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 811, Springer, Berlin, 1980.

[40]
Parsons, Charles, Proof-theoretic analysis of restricted induction schemata, Meetings of the Association for Symbolic Logic (Takeuti, Gaisi, editor), Association for Symbolic Logic, 1971, abstract, p. 361.

[41]
Parsons, Charles, On n-quantifier induction, this Journal, vol. 37 (1972), pp. 466–482.

[42]
Safarik, Pavol and Kohlenbach, Ulrich, On the computational content of the Bolzano-Weierstraß principle, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 56 (2010), no. 5, pp. 508–532.

[43]
Seetapun, David and Slaman, Theodore A., On the strength of Ramsey's theorem, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, vol. 36 (1995), no. 4, pp. 570–582, Special Issue: Models of arithmetic.

[44]
Shore, Richard A., Reverse mathematics: the playground of logic. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, vol. 16 (2010), no. 3, pp. 378–402.

[45]
Simpson, Stephen G., Subsystems of second order arithmetic, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1999.

[46]
Soare, Robert I., Recursively enumerable sets and degrees, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.

[47]
Specker, Ernst, Ramsey's theorem does not hold in recursive set theory, Logic Colloquium '69 (Proceedings of the Summer School and Colloquium, Manchester, 1969), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1971, pp. 439–442.

[48]
Spector, Clifford, Provably recursive functionals of analysis: a consistency proof of analysis by an extension ofprinciples formulated in current intuitionistic mathematics, Proceedings of the Symposium in Pure Mathematics, vol. V, American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1962, pp. 1–27.

[49]
Streicher, Thomas and Kohlenbach, Ulrich, Shoenfield is Gödel after Krivine, Mathematical Logic Quarterly, vol. 53 (2007), no. 2, pp. 176–179.

[50]
Takeuti, Gaisi, Two applications of logic to mathematics, Iwanami Shoten, Tokyo, 1978, Kanô Memorial Lectures, vol. 3, Publications of the Mathematical Society of Japan, no. 13.

[51]
Troelstra, Anne S. (editor), Metamathematical investigation of intuitionistic arithmetic and analysis, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 344, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1973.

[52]
Troelstra, Anne S., Note on the fan theorem, this Journal, vol. 39 (1974), pp. 584–596.

[53]
Weiermann, Andreas, How is it that infinitary methods can be applied to finitary mathematics? Gödel's T: a case study, this Journal, vol. 63 (1998), no. 4, pp. 1348–1370.