Hostname: page-component-8678677fb7-ngjx9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-10-07T05:52:29.933Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eliminating Selves and Persons

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 February 2021

MONIMA CHADHA
MONIMA CHADHA*
Affiliation:
Monash University
*
Monima.chadha@monash.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Buddhist no-self and no-person revisionary metaphysics aims to produce a better structure that is motivated by the normative goal of eliminating, or at least reducing, suffering. The revised structure, in turn, entails a major reconsideration of our ordinary everyday person-related concerns and practices and interpersonal attitudes, such as moral responsibility, praise and blame, compensation, and social treatment. This essay explores the extent to which we must alter and perhaps discard some of our practical commitments in light of the Buddhist revisionism. I do not argue here that we should change our ordinary practices, concerns, and attitudes, or that the Buddhist metaphysics does succeed in presenting a better structure. Rather, I offer it as an alternative structure that should be considered seriously.

Keywords

Buddhismrevisionary metaphysicspersonsperson-related practices

Information

Type
Article
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , Fall 2021 , pp. 273 - 294
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Philosophical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article is the seventh in a special series of commissioned articles on non-Western philosophies. The sixth article ‘The Philosophy of Accidentality’, by Manuel Vargas, appeared in Volume 6, Issue 4, pp. 391–409.

For valuable feedback and helpful conversations, I thank Shaun Nichols and Nirmalangshu Mukherji. I am also grateful to Helen Beebee, Miranda Fricker, and David Shoemaker for very helpful comments on an earlier draft. This work is supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Grant (DP200103557).

References

Benovsky, Jiri. (2018) Eliminativism, Objects, and Persons: The Virtues of Non-existence. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berne, Eric. (1958) ‘Transactional Analysis: A New and Effective Method of Group Therapy’. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 12, 735–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chadha, Monima. (2017) ‘No-Self and the Phenomenology of Agency’. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 16, 187–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadha, Monima. (2018) ‘No-Self and the Phenomenology of Ownership’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96, 14–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadha, Monima. (2019) ‘Reconstructing Memories, Deconstructing the Self’. Mind and Language, 34, 121–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Cowherds. (2011) Moonshadows: Conventional Truth in Buddhist Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. (1974) ‘On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme’. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 47, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, John M. (2009) ‘Skepticism about Persons’. Philosophical Issues, 19, 57–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doris, John M. (2015) Talking to Our Selves: Reflection, Ignorance, and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eltschinger, Vincent. (2014) ‘Is There a Burden-Bearer? The Sanskrit Bhārahārasūtra and Its Scholastic Interpretations’. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 134, 453–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganeri, Jonardon. (2012) The Self: Naturalism, Consciousness, and the First-Person Stance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gold, Jonathan C. (2015) ‘Vasubandhu’. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2018/entries/vasubandhu/.Google Scholar
Goodman, Charles. (2004) ‘The Treasury of Metaphysics and the Physical World’. Philosophical Quarterly, 54, 389–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heim, Maria. (2017) ‘Buddhaghosa on the Phenomenology of Love and Compassion’. In Ganeri, Jonardon (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Indian Philosophy (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017), 171–189.Google Scholar
Kapstein, Matthew T. (2001) Reason's Traces: Identity and Interpretation in Indian and Tibetan Buddhist Thought. Boston: Wisdom Publications.Google Scholar
Karunadasa, Y. (1996) The Dhamma Theory: Philosophical Cornerstone of the Abhidhamma. Kandy: Buddhist Publication Society.Google Scholar
Kriegel, Uriah. (2013) ‘The Epistemological Challenge of Revisionary Metaphysics’. Philosopher's Imprint, 13, 1–30.Google Scholar
LoLordo, Antonia. (2019) ‘Introduction’. In Antonia LoLordo (ed.), Persons: A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mukherji, Nirmalangshu. (2017) Reflections on Human Inquiry: Science, Philosophy, and Common Life. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Shaun, and Shoemaker, David W.. (MS) ‘The Embattled “Self”: Elimination or Preservation?’Google Scholar
Olson, Eric T. (1998) ‘There is No Problem of the Self’. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 5, 645–57.Google Scholar
Olson, Eric T. (2019) ‘Personal Identity’. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/identity-personal/.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Priest, Graham. (2018) ‘Marxism and Buddhism: Not such Strange Bedfellows’. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 4, 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruden, Leo M., trans. (1988–1990) Abhidharmakośabhāyam. 4 vols. Berkeley: Asian Humanities Press. English translation of Louis de la Vallée Poussins, L'Abhidharmakośa de Vasubandhu (1923–1931).Google Scholar
Repetti, Rick. (2017) ‘What Do Buddhists Think about Free Will?’ In Davis, Jake H. (ed.), A Mirror is for Reflection: Understanding Buddhist Ethics (New York: Oxford University Press), 257–75.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. (1962) ‘Naming and Saying’. Philosophy of Science, 29, 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, David W. (2007) ‘Personal Identity and Practical Concerns’. Mind, 116, 317–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shoemaker, David W. (2016) ‘The Stony Metaphysical Heart of Animalism’. In Blatti, Stephan and Snowdon, Paul F. (eds.), Animalism: New Essays on Persons, Animals, and Identity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 303–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siderits, Mark. (2011) ‘Buddhist Non-self: The No-Owner's Manual’. In Gallagher, Shaun (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Self (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 297–315.Google Scholar
Siderits, Mark. (2019) ‘Persons and Selves in Buddhist Philosophy’. In LoLordo, Antonia (ed.), Persons: A History (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 301–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1959) Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. (1974) ‘Freedom and Resentment’. In Strawson, Freedom and Resentment and Other Essays (London: Methuen), 1–28.Google Scholar
Tierney, Hannah, Howard, Chris, Kumar, Victor, Kvaran, Trevor, and Nichols, Shaun. (2014) ‘How Many of Us Are There?’ In Sytsma, Justin (ed.), Advances in Experimental Philosophy of Mind (London: Bloomsbury Academic), 181–202.Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. (1976) ‘Locke, Butler and the Stream of Consciousness: And Men as a Natural Kind’. Philosophy, 51, 131–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar