Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-rpbls Total loading time: 0.326 Render date: 2022-06-27T16:25:06.889Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Space Colonization and Existential Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2019

JOSEPH GOTTLIEB*
Affiliation:
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITYjoseph.gottlieb@ttu.edu

Abstract

Ian Stoner has recently argued that we ought not to colonize Mars because (1) doing so would flout our pro tanto obligation not to violate the principle of scientific conservation, and (2) there is no countervailing considerations that render our violation of the principle permissible. While I remain agnostic on (1), my primary goal in this article is to challenge (2): there are countervailing considerations that render our violation of the principle permissible. As such, Stoner has failed to establish that we ought not to colonize Mars. I close with some thoughts on what it would take to show that we do have an obligation to colonize Mars and related issues concerning the relationship between the way we discount our preferences over time and projects with long time horizons, like space colonization.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

For helpful comments and discussion, many thanks to Alexis Elder, Bob Fischer, Jessica Gottlieb, Judith Gottlieb, Saja Parvizian, Jeremy Schwartz, Joel Velasco, and three anonymous referees for the Journal of the American Philosophical Association.

References

Beckstead, Nick. (2015) ‘How Much Could Refuges Help Us Recover from a Global Catastrophe?Futures, 72, 3644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bostrom, Nick. (2003) ‘Astronomical Waste: The Opportunity Cost of Delayed Technological Development’. Utilitas, 15, 308–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockell, Charles S., ed. (2016a) Dissent, Revolution and Liberty beyond Earth. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockell, Charles S. (2016b) ‘Disobedience in Outer Space’. In Cockell, Charles (ed.), Dissent, Revolution and Liberty beyond Earth (Cham: Springer), 2140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dundas, Colin M., Alfred S., McEwen, Matthew, Chojnacki, Moses P., Milasso, Shane, Byrne, Jim N., McElwaine, and Anna, Urso. (2017) ‘Granular Flows at Recurring Slope Lineae on Mars Indicate a Limited Role for Liquid Water’. Nature Geoscience, 10, 903–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finneron-Burns, Elizabeth. (2017) ‘What's Wrong with Human Extinction?Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 47, 327–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frick, Johann. (2017) ‘On the Survival of Humanity’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 47, 344–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Preston, and Sullivan, Meghan. (2015) ‘Against Time Bias’. Ethics, 125, 947–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, Alan M., and J. Scott, Matthews. (2012) ‘Why Do Citizens Discount the Future? Public Opinion and the Timing of Policy Consequences.’ British Journal of Political Science, 42, 903–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Impey, Chris. (2015) Beyond: Our Future in Space. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
McKay, Christopher P., and Margarita M., Marinova. (2001) ‘The Physics, Biology, and Environmental Ethics of Making Mars Habitable’. Astrobiology, 1, 89109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milligan, Tony. (2016) ‘Constrained Dissent and the Rights of Future Generations’. In Cockell, Charles S. (ed.), Dissent, Revolution and Liberty beyond Earth (Cham: Springer), 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Robert P., Tracy R., Gill, Wiley J., Larson, and Jeffrey S., Brink. (2012) ‘Effective Utilization of Resources and Infrastructure for a Spaceport Network Architecture’. AIAA SPACE 2012 Conference and Exposition, AIAA SPACE Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2012-5233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musk, Elon. (2017) ‘Making Humans a Multi-Planetary Species’. New Space, 5, 4661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ojha, Lujendra, Mary Beth, Wilhelm, Scott L., Murchie, Alfred S., McEwen, James J., Wray, Jennifer, Hanley, Marion, Massé, and Matthew, Chojnacki. (2015) ‘Spectral Evidence for Hydrated Salts in Recurring Slope Lineae on Mars’. Nature Geoscience, 8, 829–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Systems Analysis and Concepts Directorate. (2018) ‘High Altitude Venus Operational Concept (HAVOC)’. SMAB Projects. National Air and Space Administration. Last modified December 13, 2018. Available at: https://sacd.larc.nasa.gov/smab/havoc/.Google Scholar
Parfit, Derek. (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ross, W. D. (1930) The Right and the Good. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, James S. J. (2011) ‘Our Moral Obligation to Support Space Colonization’. Environmental Ethics, 33, 6788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, James S. J. (2016) ‘Lunar Labor Relations’. In Cockell, Charles S. (ed.), Dissent, Revolution and Liberty beyond Earth (Cham: Springer), 4148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, James S. J. (2019). ‘Space Settlement: What's the Rush?Futures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.02.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoner, Ian. (2017). ‘Humans Should Not Colonize Mars’. Journal of the American Philosophical Association, 3, 334–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szocik, Konrad, Rafael Elias, Marques, Steven, Abood, Aleksandra, Kędziord, Kateryna, Lysenko-Rybad, and Dobrochna, Minich. (2018) ‘Biological and Social Challenges of Human Reproduction in a Long-Term Mars Base’. Futures, 100, 5662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Space Colonization and Existential Risk
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Space Colonization and Existential Risk
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Space Colonization and Existential Risk
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *