Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Grounding is not a Strict Order

  • GONZALO RODRIGUEZ-PEREYRA (a1)
ABSTRACT:
ABSTRACT:

The paper argues that grounding is neither irreflexive nor asymmetric nor transitive. In arguing for that conclusion the paper also argues that truthmaking is neither irreflexive nor asymmetric nor transitive.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Grounding is not a Strict Order
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Grounding is not a Strict Order
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Grounding is not a Strict Order
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. M. Armstrong (2004) Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

P. Audi (2012a) ‘A Clarification and Defense of the Notion of Grounding’. In F. Correia and B. Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 101–21.

P. Audi (2012b) ‘Grounding: Toward a Theory of the in virtue of Relation’. The Journal of Philosophy, 109 (12), 685711.

F. Correia (2014) ‘Logical Grounds’. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 7 (1), 3159.

K. Fine (2010) ‘Some Puzzles of Ground’. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 51 (1), 97118.

K. Fine (2012) ‘Guide to Ground’. In F. Correia and B. Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 3780.

A. Griffith (2014) ‘Truthmaking and Grounding’. Inquiry, 57 (2), 196215.

C. Jenkins (2011) ‘Is Metaphysical Dependence Irreflexive?’. The Monist, 94 (2), 267–76.

D. Liggins (2012) ‘Truth-makers and Dependence’. In F. Correia and B. Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 254–71.

J. E. Litland (2013) ‘On Some Counterexamples to the Transitivity of Grounding’. Essays in Philosophy, 14 (1), http://dx.doi.org/10.7710/1526-0569.1453.

G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (2002) Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

G. Rodriguez-Pereyra (2005) ‘Why Truthmakers’. In J. Dodd and H. Beebee (eds.), Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1731.

G. Rosen (2010) ‘Metaphysical Dependence: Grounding and Reduction’. In B. Hale and A. Hoffman (eds.), Modality: Metaphysics, Logic, and Epistemology (New York: Oxford University Press), 109–36.

J. Schaffer (2012) ‘Grounding, Transitivity, and Contrastivity’. In F. Correia and B. Schnieder (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 122–38.

B. Schnieder (2006) ‘Truth-making without Truth-makers’. Synthese, 152 (1), 2146.

J. Wilson (2014) ‘No Work for a Theory of Grounding’. Inquiry, 57 (5–6), 535–79.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the American Philosophical Association
  • ISSN: 2053-4477
  • EISSN: 2053-4485
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 125 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 262 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd April 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.