Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Humean Laws in an unHumean World

  • SAMUEL KIMPTON-NYE (a1)
Abstract:

I argue that an unHumean ontology of irreducibly dispositional properties might be fruitfully combined with what has typically been thought of as a Humean account of laws, namely, the best-system account, made popular by David Lewis (e.g., 1983, 1986, 1994). In this paper I provide the details of what I argue is the most defensible account of Humean laws in an unHumean world. This package of views has the benefits of upholding scientific realism while doing without any suspect metaphysical entities to account for natural law. I conclude by arguing that the Humean laws-unHumean ontology package is well placed to provide an account of objective, nontrivial chances, a famous stumbling block for the Humean laws-Humean ontology package developed by Lewis.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Humean Laws in an unHumean World
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Humean Laws in an unHumean World
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Humean Laws in an unHumean World
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Armstrong, D. M. (1983) What is a Law of Nature? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beebee, H. (2000) ‘The Non-Governing Conception of Laws of Nature’. Philosophy And Phenomenological Research, 61, 571–94.
Bigelow, J., Collins, J., and Pargetter, R.. (1993) ‘The Big Bad Bug: What Are the Humean's Chances?The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44, 443–62.
Bird, A. (2007) Nature's Metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Blackburn, S. (1990) ‘Filling in Space’. Analysis, 50, 6265.
Collins, R. (2009). ‘The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-tuning of the Universe’. In Craig, W. L. and Moreland, J. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology (Oxford: Blackwell), 202–81.
Demarest, H. (2017) ‘Powerful Properties, Powerless Laws’. In Jacobs, J. (ed.), Putting Powers To Work: Causal Powers In Contemporary Metaphysics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 3954.
Dretske, F. (1977) ‘Laws of Nature’. Philosophy of Science, 44, 248–68.
Lewis, D. (1983) ‘New Work for a Theory of Universals’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, 343–77.
Lewis, D. (1986) Philosophical Papers, Volume II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lewis, D. (1994) ‘Humean Supervenience Debugged’. Mind, 103, 473–90.
Mumford, S. (2004) Laws in Nature. London: Routledge.
Nozick, R. (1981) Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ramsey, F. P. (1990) Philosophical Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tooley, M. (1977) ‘The Nature of Laws’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 7, 667–98.
White, R. (2000) ‘Fine-tuning and Multiple Universes’. Noûs, 34, 260–76.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the American Philosophical Association
  • ISSN: 2053-4477
  • EISSN: 2053-4485
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed