Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T13:07:51.561Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intuition and Its Place in Ethics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2015

ROBERT AUDI
ROBERT AUDI*
Affiliation:
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAMERaudi@nd.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This paper provides a multifaceted account of intuition. The paper integrates apparently disparate conceptions of intuition, shows how the notion has figured in epistemology as well as in intuitionistic ethics, and clarifies the relation between the intuitive and the self-evident. Ethical intuitionism is characterized in ways that, in phenomenology, epistemology, and ontology, represent an advance over the position of W. D. Ross while preserving its commonsense normative core and intuitionist character. This requires clarifying the sense in which intuitions are non-inferential and explaining how self-evident principles may be maintained without dogmatism, how intuition is significantly analogous to perception, and how rational disagreements can extend even to the self-evident. The paper distinguishes between two orders of normative disagreement, shows how intuition can contribute to resolving normative disagreements, and represents ethical intuitionism as capable of modified forms that depart from its traditional claims in being neutral with respect to both ethical naturalism and metaphysical realism.

Keywords

apprehensiondisagreementinferencejustificationnaturalismnorm-guidednessperceptionrealismreasonsself-evidence
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the American Philosophical Association , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 57 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © American Philosophical Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquinas, Thomas. (1944) Summa theologiae. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers.Google Scholar
Aristotle. (2000) Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by Crisp, Roger. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. (2004) The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. (2006) ‘Ethical Generality and Moral Judgment’. In Dreier, James (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Ethical Theory (Oxford: Blackwell), 285–304.Google Scholar
Audi, Robert. (2011) ‘The Ethics of Belief and the Morality of Action: Intellectual Responsibility and Rational Disagreement’. Philosophy, 86, 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bealer, George. (1998) ‘Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy’. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William (eds.), Rethinking Intuition (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 201–39.Google Scholar
Brandt, R. B. (1979) A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, David, and Lackey, Jennifer, eds. (2013) The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Copp, David, ed. (2006) The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael R., and Ramsey, William, eds. (1998) Rethinking Intuition. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Doris, John M. et al., eds. (2010) The Moral Psychology Handbook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dreier, James, ed. (2006) Contemporary Debates in Ethical Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan. (1990) Wise Choices, Apt Feelings. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, Alvin I., and Pust, Joel. (1998) ‘Philosophical Theory and Intuitional Evidence’. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William (eds.), Rethinking Intuition (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 179–97.Google Scholar
Gopnik, Allison, and Schwitzgebel, Eric. (1998) ‘Whose Intuitions are They, Anyway? The Role of Intuition in Empirical Psychology’. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William (eds.), Rethinking Intuition (Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield), 75–91.Google Scholar
Hare, R. M. (1952) The Language of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hernandez, Jill Graper, ed. (2011) The New Intuitionism. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Huemer, Michael. (2005) Ethical Intuitionism. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kaspar, David. (2012) Intuitionism. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. ([1785] 1948) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Paton, H. J.. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine M. (1998) Sources of Normativity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maddy, Penelope. (1980) ‘Perception and Mathematical Intuition’. Philosophical Review, 84 (2), 163–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. ([1861] 1979) Utilitarianism. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903) Principia Ethica. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prichard, H. A. (1912) ‘Does Moral Philosophy Rest on a Mistake?’. Mind, 21 (81), 21–37.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. (2001) Justice as Fairness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roeser, Sabine. (2010) Moral Emotions and Intuitions. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ross, W.D. (1930) The Right and the Good. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. (1907) The Methods of Ethics. 7th ed.London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter, Young, Liane, and Cushman, Fiery. (2010) ‘Moral Intuition’. In Doris, John M. et al. (eds.), The Moral Psychology Handbook (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 246–72.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Charles L. (1944) Ethics and Language. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sturgeon, Nicholas. (2006) ‘Ethical Naturalism’. In Copp, David (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 91–121.Google Scholar
Stratton-Lake, Philip, ed. (2002) Intuitionism: Re-evaluations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tropman, Elizabeth. (2014) ‘Varieties of Moral Intuitionism’. Journal of Value Inquiry, 48, 177–94.Google Scholar
Tucker, Chris, ed. (2013) Seemings and Justification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. (2007) The Philosophy of Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar