Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Keeping It Implicit: A Defense of Foucault's Archaeology of Knowledge

  • TUOMO TIISALA (a1)
Abstract:
ABSTRACT:

This paper defends Michel Foucault's notion of archaeology of knowledge against the influential and putatively devastating criticism by Dreyfus and Rabinow that Foucault's archaeological project is based on an incoherent conception of the rules of the discursive practices it purports to study. I argue first that Foucault's considered view of these rules as simultaneously implicit and historically efficacious corresponds to a general requirement for the normative structure of a discursive practice. Then I argue that Foucault is entitled to that view despite the charges to the contrary by Dreyfus and Rabinow. I also explain in detail how the argument by Dreyfus and Rabinow arises from a misunderstanding of Foucault's archaeological project as transcendental inquiry, while archaeology of knowledge is, in fact, a diagnostic project. The result is a novel understanding of the notion of archaeology of knowledge that enables a reassessment of Foucault's philosophical work in connection with current debates regarding the relationship between reflection and practice in the structure of thought.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Brandom Robert. (1994) Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brandom Robert. (2011) Perspectives on Pragmatism: Classical, Recent, and Contemporary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Davidson Arnold I. (1986) ‘Archaeology, Genealogy, Ethics’. In Hoy David Couzens (ed.), Foucault: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell), 221–34.
Davidson Arnold I. (2001) The Emergence of Sexuality: Historical Epistemology and the Formation of Concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Djaballah Marc. (2008) Kant, Foucault, and Forms of Experience. London: Routledge.
Dreyfus Hubert L. (1972) What Computers Can't Do: The Limits of Artificial Intelligence. New York: Harper & Row.
Dreyfus Hubert L. (1991) Being-in-the-World: A Commentary on Heidegger's Being and Time, Division 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dreyfus Hubert L. (2007) ‘Return of the Myth of the Mental’. Inquiry, 50, 352–65.
Dreyfus Hubert L., and Rabinow Paul. (1982) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Falzon Christopher, O'Leary Timothy, and Sawicki Jana, eds. (2013) A Companion to Foucault. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Fodor Jerry A. (1975) The Language of Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Foucault Michel. (1966a) Les mots et les choses: Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault Michel. (1966b) ‘Michel Foucault : “Les mots et les choses”’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:526–32.
Foucault Michel. (1966c) ‘Entretien avec Madeleine Chapsal’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:541–46.
Foucault Michel. (1966d) ‘L'homme, est-il mort?’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:568–72.
Foucault Michel. (1966e) ‘Qu'est-ce qu'un philosophe?’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:580-81.
Foucault Michel. (1967a) ‘Philosophie structuraliste permet de diagnostiquer ce qu'est “aujourd'hui”’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:608-12.
Foucault Michel. (1967b) ‘Sur les façons d’écrire l'histoire’. In Dits et écrits, (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:613–28.
Foucault Michel. (1967c) ‘“Qui êtes-vous, professeur Foucault?”’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:629–48.
Foucault Michel. (1967d) ‘L'archéologie du savoir’. NAF 28284 (1), Bibliothèque nationale de France, Paris.
Foucault Michel. (1968) ‘Foucault répond à Sartre’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:690–96.
Foucault Michel. (1969a) L'archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault Michel. (1969b) ‘‘La naissance d'un monde’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:814–17.
Foucault Michel. (1969c) ‘Titres et travaux’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:870–74.
Foucault Michel. (1970) ‘Préface à l'édition anglaise’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:875–81.
Foucault Michel. (1971a) ‘Entretien avec Michel Foucault’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:1025–42.
Foucault Michel. (1971b) ‘Un problème m'intéresse depuis longtemps, c'est celui du système pénal’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:1073–77.
Foucault Michel. (1973) ‘Le monde est un grand asile’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 1:1301–02.
Foucault Michel. (1976) ‘Le discours ne doit pas être pris comme. . .’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 2:123–24.
Foucault Michel. (1977) ‘Le jeu de Michel Foucault’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 2:298329.
Foucault Michel. (1980) ‘Table ronde du 20 mai 1978’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 2:839–53.
Foucault Michel. (1981) ‘Est-il donc important de penser?’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 2:9971001.
Foucault Michel. (1982) ‘L'âge d'or de la lettre de cachet’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 2:1170–71.
Foucault Michel. (1984a) Histoire de la sexualité 2: L'usage des plaisirs. Paris: Gallimard.
Foucault Michel. (1984b) ‘Qu'est-ce que les Lumières ?’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 2:1381–97.
Foucault Michel. (1984c) ‘Préface à l’ “Histoire de la sexualité”’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 2:13971403.
Foucault Michel. (1984d) ‘Foucault’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 2:1450–54.
Foucault Michel. (1984e) ‘Le style de l'histoire’. In Dits et écrits (Paris: Gallimard, 2001), 2:1468–74.
Foucault Michel. (2001) Dits et écrits, 1954–1988. Edited by Daniel Defert and François Ewald. 2 vols. Paris: Gallimard.
Friedman Michael. (1999) Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Gutting Gary. (1989) Michel Foucault's Archaeology of Scientific Reason. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hacking Ian. (1979) ‘Michel Foucault's Immature Science’. Noûs, 13, 3951.
Hacking Ian. (1986) ‘The Archaeology of Foucault’. In Couzens Hoy David (ed.), Foucault: A Critical Reader (Oxford: Blackwell), 2740.
Heidegger Martin. ([1927] 1962) Being and Time. Translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper & Row.
Han Béatrice. (1998) L'ontologie manquée de Michel Foucault. Grenoble: Jêrome Millon.
Kant Immanuel. ([1781/87] 1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kant Immanuel. ([1785] 1996) Groundwork of The Metaphysics of Morals. Translated by Mary J. Gregor. In Gregor Mary J. (ed.), Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 41108.
Kant Immanuel. ([1788] 1996) Critique of Practical Reason. Translated by Mary J. Gregor. In Mary J. Gregor (ed.), Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 137271.
Kant Immanuel. ([1793] 1996) ‘On the Common Saying: That May Be Correct in Theory, But It Is of No Use in Practice’. Translated by Mary J. Gregor. In Mary J. Gregor (ed.), Practical Philosophy (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press), 277309.
Koopman Colin, ed. (2011) Special issue on Foucault and Pragmatism, Foucault Studies, 11.
Kusch Martin. (1991) Foucault's Strata and Fields: An Investigation into Archaeological and Genealogical Science Studies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
McDowell John. (2007) ‘What Myth?’. Inquiry, 50, 338–51.
Noë Alva. (2005) ‘Against Intellectualism’. Analysis, 65, 278–90.
O'Leary Timothy, and Falzon Christopher, eds. (2010) Foucault and Philosophy. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Ryle Gilbert. (1949) The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.
Sellars Wilfrid. (1954) ‘Some Reflections on Language Games’. Philosophy of Science, 21, 204–28.
Stern Robert. (2013) ‘Kant, Moral Obligation, and the Holy Will’. In Timmons Mark and Baiasu Sorin (eds.), Kant on Practical Justification (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 125–52.
Stump David J. (2015) Conceptual Change and the Philosophy of Science: Alternative Interpretations of the A Priori. London: Routledge.
Veyne Paul. ([1978] 1997) ‘Foucault Revolutionizes History’. Translated by Catherine Porter. In Davidson Arnold I. (ed.), Foucault and His Interlocutors (Chicago: University of Chicago Press), 146–82.
Williams Bernard. (1985) Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Routledge.
Wittgenstein Ludwig. (1953) Philosophische Untersuchungen / Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wright Crispin. (2007) ‘Rule-Following Without Reasons: Wittgenstein's Quietism and the Constitutive Question’. Ratio, 20, 481502.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the American Philosophical Association
  • ISSN: 2053-4477
  • EISSN: 2053-4485
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 153 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 497 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.