Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Social Mereology

  • KATHERINE HAWLEY (a1)
Abstract:

What kind of entity is a committee, a book group, or a band? I argue that committees and other such social groups are concrete, composite particulars, having ordinary human beings among their parts. Thus, the committee members are literally parts of the committee. This mereological view of social groups was popular several decades ago but fell out of favor following influential objections from David-Hillel Ruben. Recent years have seen a tidal wave of work in metaphysics, including the metaphysics of parts and wholes. We now have the resources to rehabilitate the mereological view of social groups. I show how this can be done and why we should bother.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Social Mereology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Social Mereology
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Social Mereology
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Bird, Alexander. (2010) ‘Social Knowing: The Social Sense of “Scientific Knowledge”’. Philosophical Perspectives, 24, 2356.
Effingham, Nikk. (2010) ‘The Metaphysics of Groups’. Philosophical Studies, 149, 251–67.
Epstein, Brian. (2015) The Ant Trap. New York: Oxford University Press.
Evnine, Simon J. (2016) Making Objects and Events: A Hylomorphic Theory of Artifacts, Actions and Organisms. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fine, Kit. (2003) ‘The Non-Identity of a Material Thing and Its Matter’. Mind, 112, 195234.
Hansson Wahlberg, Tobias. (2014) ‘Institutional Objects, Reductionism and Theories of Persistence’. Dialectica, 68, 525–62.
Hawley, Katherine, and Bird, Alexander. (2011) ‘What are Natural Kinds?Philosophical Perspectives, 25, 205–21.
Hindriks, Frank. (2013) ‘The Location Problem in Social Ontology’. Synthese, 190, 412–37.
Lewis, David. (1991) Parts of Classes. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Loewer, Barry, and Schaffer, Jonathan. (2015) A Companion to David Lewis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
MacDonald, Graham, and Pettit, Philip. (1981) Semantics and Social Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Magidor, Ofra (2011) ‘Arguments By Leibniz's Law in Metaphysics’. Philosophy Compass, 6, 180–95.
Mellor, D. H. (1982) ‘The Reduction of Society’. Philosophy, 57, 5175.
Oppenheim, Paul, and Putnam, Hilary. (1958) ‘Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis’. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2, 336.
Quinton, Anthony. (1975–76) ‘Social Objects’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 76, 127.
Ritchie, Katherine. (2013) ‘What Are Groups?’. Philosophical Studies, 155, 257–72.
Ruben, David-Hillel. (1983) ‘Social Wholes and Parts’. Mind, 92, 219–38.
Ruben, David-Hillel. (1985) The Metaphysics of the Social World. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Uzquiano, Gabriel. (2004) ‘The Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices: A Metaphysical Puzzle’. Noûs, 38, 135–53.
Wasserman, Ryan. (2017) ‘Material Constitution’. In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2017 edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2017/entries/material-constitution/.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the American Philosophical Association
  • ISSN: 2053-4477
  • EISSN: 2053-4485
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-american-philosophical-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 43
Total number of PDF views: 264 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 837 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 12th February 2018 - 22nd July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.