Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-21T01:12:23.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The degree of the gradient of a coercive functional

Part of: Calculus on manifolds; nonlinear operators Classical Topics in Algebraic Topology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2009

Ross H. McKenzie
Ross H. McKenzie
Affiliation:
Department of Physics Joseph Henry Laboratories Jadwin Hall, P. O. Box 708Princeton UniversityPrinceton, New Jersey 08544, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An elementary proof is given of a theorem of Castro and Lazer that the degree of the gradient of a coercive functional on a large ball of Rn is one.

MSC classification

Secondary: 58C05: Real-valued functions 55M25: Degree, winding number
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , December 1984 , pp. 413 - 415
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Mathematical Society 1984

References

Amann, H. (1982), ‘A note on degree theory for gradient mappings’, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 85, 591–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, A. and Lazer, A. C. (1979), ‘Critical point theory and the number of solutions of a nonlinear Dirichlet problem’, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 70, 113–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillemin, V. and Pollack, A. (1974), Differential topology (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.).Google Scholar
McKenzie, R. H. (1982), Gravitational lenses (B. Sc. (Hons.) Thesis, Australian National University).Google Scholar
Milnor, J. (1963), Morse theory (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milnor, J. (1965), Topology from a differential viewpoint (University of Virginia Press, Charlottesville, Va.).Google Scholar
Nirenberg, L. (1981), ‘Variational and Topological methods in nonlinear problems’, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 4, 267–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar