Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:36:42.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE UBIQUITY OF THOMPSON'S GROUP F IN GROUPS OF PIECEWISE LINEAR HOMEOMORPHISMS OF THE UNIT INTERVAL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 1999

MATTHEW G. BRIN
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Sciences, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA; matt@math.binghamton.edu
Get access

Abstract

In the 1960s, Richard J. Thompson introduced a triple of groups FTG which, among them, supplied the first examples of infinite, finitely presented, simple groups [14] (see [6] for published details), a technique for constructing an elementary example of a finitely presented group with an unsolvable word problem [12], the universal obstruction to a problem in homotopy theory [8], and the first examples of torsion free groups of type FP and not of type FP [5]. In abstract measure theory, it has been suggested by Geoghegan (see [3] or [9, Question 13]) that F might be a counterexample to the conjecture that any finitely presented group with no non-cyclic free subgroup is amenable (admits a bounded, non-trivial, finitely additive measure on all subsets that is invariant under left multiplication). Recently, F has arisen in the theory of groups of diagrams over semigroup presentations [10], and as the object of questions in the algebra of string rewriting systems [7]. For more extensive bibliographies and more results on Thompson's groups and their generalizations see [1, 4, 6].

A persistent peculiarity of Thompson's groups is their ability to pop up in diverse areas of mathematics. This suggests that there might be something very natural about Thompson's groups. We support this idea by showing (Theorem 1.1 below) that PLo(I), the group of piecewise linear (finitely many changes of slope), orientation-preserving, self-homeomorphisms of the unit interval, is riddled with copies of F: a very weak criterion implies that a subgroup of PLo(I) must contain an isomorphic copy of F.

Type
Notes and Papers
Copyright
The London Mathematical Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)