^{page 2 note 1} See Epigraphia Indica, vol. i. p. 244.

^{page 3 note 1} See Tod's, Annals and Antiquities of Rājasthān, vol. ii. p. 234Google Scholar.

^{page 4 note 1} Metre of verses 1–26: Sloka (Anushṭubh).

^{page 4 note 2} Read .

^{page 4 note 3} Read .

^{page 4 note 4} Read .

^{page 4 note 5} Read .

^{page 5 note 1} This may also be read . Munshi Debiprasād's rendering is ‘of the Rohilladdhi clan.’ The exact sense of the word is not apparent.

^{page 5 note 2} Read .

^{page 5 note 3} Read .

^{page 6 note 1} Read .

^{page 6 note 2} Read .

^{page 6 note 3} Read .

^{page 6 note 4} Read .

^{page 6 note 5} Read .

^{page 6 note 6} This is quite clear in the impression.

^{page 6 note 7} The akshara in brackets looks like , altered to .

^{page 6 note 8} The last akshara looks like , altered to .

^{page 6 note 9} Read .

^{page 6 note 10} Here, again, the last akshara looks like , altered to .

^{page 7 note 1} Read .

^{page 7 note 2} Read .

^{page 7 note 3} Read

^{page 7 note 4} Read .

^{page 7 note 5} Read .

^{page 7 note 6} Read .

^{page 7 note 7} Read .

^{page 7 note 8} Possibly the reading is .

^{page 8 note 1} Read .

^{page 8 note 2} Metre of verses 27 and 28: Sragdharā. The general sense of these verses is quite clear, but the construction is faulty in them, and they contain gross grammatical mistakes.

^{page 8 note 3} Probably the intended reading is .

^{page 8 note 4} Read (?).

^{page 8 note 5} Read .

^{page 8 note 6} This seems to be the actual reading, but it yields no sense.

^{page 8 note 7} Read .

^{page 8 note 8} Metre: Āryā.

^{page 8 note 9} What the writer meant was probably ; read .

^{page 8 note 10} Read .

^{page 9 note 1} Metre: Mālinī.

^{page 9 note 2} Read . The following is, in the original, preceded by two dots, resembling the sign of visarga, and followed by a single dot. Munshi Debiprasād would read the whole , but there is really only one numeral figure, which is . The date is preceded by the figure of a disk, and followed by that of a conch-shell.