Hostname: page-component-59f8fd8595-9z55p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-21T18:31:32.208Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Evaluating the fitness effects of seed size and maternal tree size on Polylepis tomentella (Rosaceae) seed germination and seedling performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2020

Alejandra I. Domic*
Department of Geosciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA16802, USA Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA16802, USA Herbario Nacional de Bolivia – Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, Campus Universitario Cota Cota, La Paz, Bolivia
José M. Capriles
Department of Anthropology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA16802, USA
Gerardo R. Camilo
Department of Biology, Saint Louis University, Saint Louis, MO63103, USA
Author for correspondence: *Alejandra I. Domic, Email:


In vascular plants, larger seeds are generally associated with higher germination potential, healthier seedlings and overall higher rates of survivorship. How this relationship holds or what other physiological tradeoffs evolved in plants adapted to high-altitude environments, such as the tropical and subtropical highland Polylepis tree, remain unclear. In this study, we evaluated the relationship between seed mass and seedling performance by testing the reserve effect, the metabolic effect, and the seedling-size effect hypotheses in Polylepis tomentella Weddell (Rosaceae). Since the relationship between fitness and seed size can often depend on maternal plant size, we additionally investigated the association between germination success, seedling performance (survival, relative growth rate (RGR) and height), and size of bearing-seed trees under controlled greenhouse conditions. Our results showed that heavier seeds are more likely to germinate, but we did not find evidence that could support the reserve effect, metabolic effect or seedling-size effect. As seedlings from larger and medium seeds exhibited comparatively similar RGR, survival percentages and final size, maternal plant size was positively associated with improved seed quality and seedling performance. These results demonstrate that seed mass and maternal size during early seedling establishment are critical for Polylepis persistence, demography and conservation.

Research Article
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Literature cited

Adler, PB, Salguero-Gómez, R, Compagnoni, A, Hsu, JS, Ray-Mukherjee, J, Mbeau-Ache, C and Franco, M (2014) Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 111, 740745.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arrazóla, S, Coronado, I, Navarro, G., Meneses, RI, Torrico, L and Ferreira, W (2012) Polylepis tomentella subsp. tomentella Pilg. In Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Agua, Libro rojo de la flora amenazada de Bolivia. zona Andina. La Paz: Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Agua, pp. 104105.Google Scholar
Aziz, S and Shaukat, SS (2010) Effect of seed mass variations on the germination and survival of three desert annuals. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42, 28132825.Google Scholar
Baraloto, C, Forget, P-M and Goldberg, DE (2005) Seed mass, seedling size and neotropical tree seedling establishment. Journal of Ecology 93, 11561166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfil, C (1998) The effects of seed size, cotyledon reserves, and herbivory on seedling survival and growth in Quercus rugosa and Q. laurina (Fagaceae). American Journal of Botany 85, 7987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, J, Reich, P, Sánchez-Miranda, Á and Guerrero, JD (2008) Evidence that the negative relationship between seed mass and relative growth rate is not physiological but linked to species identity: a within-family analysis of Scots pine. Tree Physiology 28, 10771082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cierjacks, A, Iglesias, JE, Wesche, K and Hensen, I (2007) Impact of sowing, canopy cover and litter on seedling dynamics of two Polylepis species at upper tree lines in central Ecuador. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23, 309318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cierjacks, A, Salgado, S, Wesche, K and Hensen, I (2008) Post-fire population dynamics of two tree species in high-altitude Polylepis forests of central Ecuador. Biotropica 40, 176182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, JHC, Castro Diez, P and Hunt, R (1996) Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types. Journal of Ecology 84, 755765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domic, AI (2012) Effects of Anthropogenic Disturbances on the Regeneration of an Andean Tree Species. St. Louis, MI: Saint Louis University.Google Scholar
Domic, AI, Mamani, E and Camilo, G (2013) Fenología reproductiva de la kewiña (Polylepis tomentella, Rosaceae) en la puna semihúmeda de Chuquisaca (Bolivia). Ecología en Bolivia 48, 3145.Google Scholar
Domic, AI, Camilo, GR and Capriles, JM (2014) Small-scale farming and grazing reduce regeneration of Polylepis tomentella (Rosaceae) in the semiarid Andes of Bolivia. Biotropica 46, 106113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domic, AI, Bernhardt, P, Edens-Meier, R, Camilo, GR and Capriles, JM (2017) Pollination ecology of Polylepis tomentella (Rosaceae), an Andean anemophilous tree presenting a potential floral fungal infection. International Journal of Plant Sciences 178, 512521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dudash, MR (1991) Plant size effects on female and male function in hermaphroditic Sabatia angularis (Gentianaceae). Ecology 72, 10041012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunlap, JR and Barnett, JP (1983) Influence of seed size on germination and early development of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) germinants. Journal of Forest Research 13, 4044.Google Scholar
Ellison, AM (2001) Interspecific and intraspecific variation in seed size and germination requirements of Sarracenia (Sarraceniaceae). American Journal of Botany 88, 429437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbis, TA (2003) Seedling demography in an alpine ecosystem. American Journal of Botany 90, 11971206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganade, G and Westoby, M (1999) Seed mass and the evolution of early-seedling etiolation. American Naturalist 154, 469480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gillaspy, G, Ben-David, H and Gruissem, W (1993) Fruits: a developmental perspective. Plant Cell 5, 14391451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gómez, JM (2004) Bigger is not always better: conflicting selective pressures on seed size in Quercus ilex. Evolution 58, 7180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Rodríguez, V, Villar, R and Navarro-Cerrillo, RM (2011) Maternal influences on seed mass effect and initial seedling growth in four Quercus species. Acta Oecologica 37, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, PT (1999) Seed germination in Chrysophyllum sp. nov., a large-seeded rainforest species in north Queensland: effects of seed size, litter depth and seed position. Australia Journal of Ecology 24, 608613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, PT and Juniper, PA (2004) Seed-seedling allometry in tropical rain forest trees: seed mass-related patterns of resource allocation and the ‘reserve effect’ Journal of Ecology 92, 397408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, H, Weiner, J, Mazer, SJ, Zhao, Z, Du, G and Li, B (2012) Reproductive allometry in Pedicularis species changes with elevation. Journal of Ecology 100, 452458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, SD and Trapp, EJ (1992) Population demography of Pastinaca sativa (Apiaceae): effects of seed mass on emergence, survival, and recruitment. American Journal of Botany 79, 365375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendrix, SD, Nielsen, E, Nielsen, T and Schutt, M (1991) Are seedlings from small seeds always inferior to seedlings from large seeds? Effects of seed biomass on seedling growth in Pastinaca sativa L. New Phytologist 119, 299305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirayama, D, Itoh, A and Yamakura, T (2004) Implications from seed traps for reproductive success, allocation and cost in a tall tree species Lindera erythrocarpa. Plant Species Biology 19, 185196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, M (1995) The genus Polylepis (Rosaceae) in Bolivia. Candollea 50, 131171.Google Scholar
Kozłowski, J (1992) Optimal allocation of resources to growth and reproduction: Implications for age and size at maturity. Trends Ecology and Evolution 7, 1519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leger, EA, Atwater, DZ and James, JJ (2019) Seed and seedling traits have strong impacts on establishment of a perennial bunchgrass in invaded semi-arid systems. Journal of Applied Ecology 56, 13431354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehtilä, K and Ehrlén, J (2005) Seed size as an indicator of seed quality: a case study of Primula veris. Acta Oecologica 28, 207212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leishman, MR and Westoby, M (1994) The role of seed size in seedling establishment in dry soil conditions – experimental evidence from semi-arid species. Journal of Ecology 82, 249258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leishman, MR, Masters, GJ, Clarke, IP and Brown, VK (2000) Seed bank dynamics: the role of fungal pathogens and climate change. Functional Ecology 14, 293299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, Z, Willis, CG, Zhang, C, Zhou, H, Zhao, X, Dong, S, Yao, B, Huang, X, Zhao, F-Y, Yin, G-J, Wei and Du, G (2019) Direct and indirect effect of seed size on seedling survival along an experimental light availability gradient. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 281, 6471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macek, P, Macková, J and de Bello, F (2009) Morphological and ecophysiological traits shaping altitudinal distribution of three Polylepis treeline species in the dry tropical Andes. Acta Oecologica 35, 778785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcora, P, Hensen, I, Renison, D, Seltmann, P and Wesche, K (2008) The performance of Polylepis australis trees along their entire altitudinal range: implications of climate change for their conservation. Diversity & Distribution 14, 630636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moles, AT and Westoby, M (2004) Seedling survival and seed size: a synthesis of the literature. Journal of Ecology 92, 372383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, G, Molina, JA and de la Barra, N (2005) Classification of the high-Andean Polylepis forests in Bolivia. Plant Ecology 176, 113130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, G, Arrazóla, S, Balderrama, JA, Ferreira, W, De la Barra, N, Antezana, C, Gómez, MI and Mercado, ME (2010) Diagnóstico del estado de conservación y caracterización de los bosques de Polylepis en Bolivia y su avifauna. Revista Boliviana de Ecología y Conservación Ambientental 28, 135.Google Scholar
Parker, WC, Noland, TL and Morneault, AE (2006) The effects of seed mass on germination, seedling emergence, and early seedling growth of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.). New Forest 32, 3349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollice, J, Marcora, P and Renison, D (2013) Seed production in Polylepis australis (Rosaceae) as influenced by tree size, livestock and interannual climate variations in the mountains of central Argentina. New Forest 44, 233247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poorter, L and Rose, SA (2005) Light-dependent changes in the relationship between seed mass and seedling traits: a meta-analysis for rain forest tree species. Oecologia 142, 378387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quero, JL, Villar, R, Marañón, T, Zamora, R and Poorter, L (2007) Seed-mass effects in four Mediterranean Quercus species (Fagaceae) growing in contrasting light environments. American Journal of Botany 94, 17951803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quinn, G and Keough, M (2002) Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renison, D, Hensen, I and Cingolani, AM (2004) Anthropogenic soil degradation affects seed viability in Polylepis australis mountain forests of central Argentina. Forest Ecology and Management 196, 327333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renison, D, Cingolani, AM, Suarez, R, Menoyo, E, Coutsiers, C, Sobral, A and Hensen, I (2005) The restoration of degraded mountain woodlands: effects of seed provenance and microsite characteristics on Polylepis australis seedling survival and growth in Central Argentina. Restoration Ecology 13, 129137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renison, D, Bergero, H, Soteras, F, Herrero, ML, Rodríguez, JM, Torres, RC, Cingolani, AM and Hensen, I (2019) Progeny performance and pathogen attack relative to elevation in a neotropical tree. CERNE 25, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roach, DA and Wulff, RD (1987) Maternal effects in plants. Annual Review Ecology and Systematics 18, 209235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samson, DA and Werk, KS (1986) Size-dependent effects in the analysis of reproductive effort in plants. American Naturalist 127, 667680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saverimuttu, T and Westoby, M (1996) Seedling longevity under deep shade in relation to seed size. Journal of Ecology 84, 681689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltmann, P, Leyer, I, Renison, D and Hensen, I (2007 a) Variation of seed mass and its effects on germination in Polylepis australis: implications for seed collection. New Forest 33, 171181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seltmann, P, Renison, D, Cocucci, A, Hensen, I and Jung, K (2007 b) Fragment size, pollination efficiency and reproductive success in natural populations of wind-pollinated Polylepis australis (Rosaceae) trees. Flora – Morphology Distribution Functional Ecology of Plants 202, 547554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, BB (1979) A revision of the genus Polylepis (Rosaceae: Sanguisorbeae). Smithsonian Contributions to Botany 43, 162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snook, LK, Cámara-Cabrales, L and Kelty, MJ (2005) Six years of fruit production by mahogany trees (Swietenia macrophylla King): patterns of variation and implications for sustainability. Forest Ecology and Management 206, 221235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St. Clair, JB and Adams, WT (1991) Effects of seed weight and rate of emergence on early growth of open-pollinated Douglas-fir families. Forest Science 37, 987997.Google Scholar
Susko, DJ and Cavers, PB (2008) Seed size effects and competitive ability in Thlaspi arvense L. (Brassicaceae). Botany 86, 259267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadey, M and Souto, CP (2016) Unexpectedly, intense livestock grazing in arid rangelands strengthens the seedling vigor of consumed plants. Agronomy of Sustainable Development 36, 63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theimer, TC (2003) Intraspecific variation in seed size affects scatterhoarding behaviour of an Australian tropical rain-forest rodent. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19, 9598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripathi, RS and Khan, ML (1990) Effects of seed weight and microsite characteristics on germination and seedling fitness in two species of Quercus in a subtropical wet hill forest. Oikos 57, 286296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velez, V, Cavelier, J and Devia, B (1998) Ecological traits of the tropical treeline species Polylepis quadrijuga (Rosaceae) in the Andes of Colombia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 14, 771787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, WN and Ripley, BD (1998) Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Verdú, M and Traveset, A (2005) Early emergence enhances plant fitness: a phylogenetically controlled meta-analysis. Ecology 86, 13851394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesche, K, Cierjacks, A, Assefa, Y, Wagner, S, Fetene, M and Hensen, I (2008) Recruitment of trees at tropical alpine treelines: Erica in Africa versus Polylepis in South America. Plant Ecology and Diversity 1, 3546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westerband, AC and Horvitz, CC (2015) Interactions between plant size and canopy openness influence vital rates and life-history tradeoffs in two neotropical understory herbs. American Journal of Botany 102, 12901299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westoby, M and Leishman, M (1996) Comparative ecology of seed size and dispersal. Philosophical Transactions of Royal Society B Biological Sciences 351, 13091318.Google Scholar
Wright, IJ and Westoby, M (1999) Differences in seedling growth behaviour among species: trait correlations across species, and trait shifts along nutrient compared to rainfall gradients. Journal of Ecology 87, 8597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, RD (1986) Seed size variation in Desmodium paniculatum: II. Effects on seedling growth and physiological performance. Journal of Ecology 74, 99114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar