Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768ffcd9cc-6vg6l Total loading time: 0.352 Render date: 2022-12-03T10:00:04.173Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Seedling growth responses to water and nutrient augmentation in the understorey of a lowland moist forest, Panama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2008

Joseph B. Yavitt*
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca NY 14853-3001, USA
S. Joseph Wright
Affiliation:
Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama
*
1Corresponding author. Email: jby1@cornell.edu

Abstract:

We irrigated and fertilized (with nutrients) seedlings of Doliocarpus olivaceus (Dilleniaceae, a shade-tolerant liana), Faramea occidentalis (Rubiaceae, a shade-tolerant understorey tree) and Tetragastris panamensis (Burseraceae, a shade-tolerant canopy tree) growing in the understorey of an old-growth tropical moist forest in Panama to assess the impact of seasonal water availability and nutrient-poor soils on seedling growth rates. In control plots, height growth rates were greater in the dry season than in the wet season for Doliocarpus (21%) and for Faramea (89%), whereas Tetragastris had similar seasonal rates. For numbers of leaves, Faramea had 3.5-fold greater relative growth rates in the dry season than in the wet season, while Doliocarpus and Tetragastris lost leaves (semi-deciduous) during the same period. Irrigation and nutrient augmentation increased height growth rates for all three species (45% to 272%). For Doliocarpus, irrigation and nutrient augmentation prevented leaf fall during the dry season. For Faramea in the dry season, irrigation and nutrient augmentation when applied independently reduced the growth of new leaves by 65% to 87%, but relative growth rates for number of leaves were the same as the control rates in the combined irrigation and nutrient augmentation treatment. The growth of new leaves for Tetragastris responded to dry-season irrigation but not nutrient augmentation. Although all measurements occurred beneath the forest canopy, during the dry season, Tetragastris had a negative relationship between canopy openness and relative growth rate for number of leaves, whereas the other two species had a positive relationship. Our results show that soil resources influence growth rates even in the deep shade of the forest understorey, and demonstrate different responses to soil resources among species that might contribute to niche differentiation and species coexistence.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ASHTON, M. S., SINGHAKUMARA, B. M. P. & GAMAGE, H. K. 2006. Interaction between light and drought affect performance of Asian tropical tree species that have differing topographic affinities. Forest Ecology and Management 221:4251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BAKER, T. R., SWAINE, M. D. & BURSLEM, D. F. R. P. 2003. Variation in tropical forest growth rates: combined effects of functional group composition and resource availability. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 6:2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARALOTO, C., GOLDBERG, D. E. & BONAL, D. 2005. Performance trade-offs among tropical tree seedlings in contrasting microhabitats. Ecology 86:24612472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARBERIS, I. M. & TANNER, E. V. J. 2005. Gaps and root trenching increase tree seedling growth in Panamanian semi-evergreen forest. Ecology 86:667674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECKAGE, B. & CLARK, J. S. 2003. Seedling survival and growth of three forest tree species: the role of spatial heterogeneity. Ecology 84:18491861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECKER, P., RABENOLD, P. E., IDOL, J. R. & SMITH, A. P. 1988. Water potential gradients for gaps and slopes in a Panamanian tropical moist forest dry season. Journal of Tropical Ecology 4:173184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECKER, P., ERHART, D. W. & SMITH, A. P. 1989. Analysis of forest light environments. 1. Computerized estimation of solar-radiation from hemispherical canopy photographs. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 44:217232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUNKER, D. E. & CARSON, W. P. 2005. Drought stress and tropical forest woody seedlings: effect on community structure and composition. Journal of Ecology 93:794806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURSLEM, D. F. R. P. 1996. Differential responses to nutrients, shade and drought among tree seedlings of the lowland tropical forest in Singapore. Pp. 211224 in Swaine, M. D. (ed.). The ecology of tropical forest seedlings. The Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnforth.Google Scholar
BURSLEM, D. F. R. P., GRUBB, P. J. & TURNER, I. M. 1996. Responses to simulated drought and elevated nutrient supply among shade-tolerant tree seedlings of lowland tropical forest in Singapore. Biotropica 28:636648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CONDIT, R. G., AGUILAR, S., HERNANDEZ, A., PEREZ, R., LAO, S., ANGEHR, G. R., HUBBELL, S. P. & FOSTER, R. B. 2004. Tropical forest dynamics across a rainfall gradient and the impact of an El Niño dry season. Journal of Tropical Ecology 20:5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COOMES, D. A. & GRUBB, P. J. 2000. Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecological Monographs 70:171207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CORDERO, S. R. A. 2000. Effect of two natural light regimes and nutrient addition on the forest herb Begonia decandra (Begoniaceae). Revista de Biología Tropical 48:579586.Google Scholar
DALLING, J. W. & HUBBELL, S. P. 2002. Seed size, growth rate and gap microsite conditions as determinants of recruitment success for pioneer species. Journal of Ecology 90:557568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DALLING, J. W. & TANNER, E. V. J. 1995. An experimental study of regeneration on landslides in montane forest in Jamaica. Journal of Ecology 83:5564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DAVIES, S. J. 2001. Tree mortality and growth in 11 sympatric Macaranga species in Borneo. Ecology 82: 920932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DENSLOW, J. S. 1987. Tropical rainforest gaps and tree species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18:431451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ENGELBRECHT, B. M. J., KURSAR, T. A. & TYREE, M. T. 2005. Drought effects on seedling survival in a tropical moist forest. Trees – Structure and Function 19:312321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAHEY, T. J., BATTLES, J. J. & WILSON, G. F. 1998. Responses of early successional northern hardwood forests to changes in nutrient availability. Ecological Monographs 68:183212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FISHER, B. L., HOWE, H. F. & WRIGHT, S. J. 1991. Survival and growth of Virola surinamensis yearlings: water augmentation in gap and understory. Oecologia 86:292297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GILBERT, B., WRIGHT, S. J., MULLER-LANDAU, H. C., KITAJIMA, K. & HERNANDÉZ, A. 2006. Life history trade-offs in tropical trees and lianas. Ecology 87:12811288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HÄTTENSCHWILER, S. 2002. Liana seedling growth in response to fertilisation in a neotropical forest understorey. Basic and Applied Ecology 3:135143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLDRIDGE, L. R. & BUDOWSKI, G. 1956. Report of an ecological survey of the Republic of Panama. Caribbean Forester 17:92110.Google Scholar
HUANTE, P., RINCON, E. & CHAPIN, F. S. 1995. Responses to phosphorus of contrasting successional tree-seedling species from the tropical deciduous forest of Mexico. Functional Ecology 9:760766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHN, R., DALLING, J. W., HARMS, K. E., YAVITT, J. B., STALLARD, R. F., MIRABELLO, M., HUBBELL, S. P., VALENCIA, R., NAVARETTE, H., VALLEJO, M. & FOSTER, R. B. 2007. Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 104:864869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
JOHNSSON, M. J. & STALLARD, R. F. 1989. Physiographic controls on the composition of sediments derived from volcanic and sedimentary terrains on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Journal of Sedimentary Petrology 59:768781.Google Scholar
KIKUZAWA, K. 1991. A cost-benefit analysis of leaf habit and leaf longevity of trees and their geographical pattern. American Naturalist 138:12501260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KITAJIMA, K. 2002. Do shade-tolerant tropical tree seedlings depend longer on seed reserves? Functional growth analysis of three Bignoniaceae species. Functional Ecology 16:433444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KURSAR, T. A., WRIGHT, S. J. & RADULOVICH, R. 1995. The effects of the rainy season and irrigation on soil water and oxygen in a seasonal forest in Panama. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11:497515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAWRENCE, D. 2003. The response of tropical tree seedlings to nutrient supply: meta-analysis for understanding a changing tropical landscape. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19:239250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEHTO, T. & GRACE, J. 1994. Carbon balance of tropical tree seedlings: a comparison of two species. New Phytologist 127:455463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MEZIANE, D. & SHIPLEY, B. 1999. Interacting components of interspecific relative growth rate: constancy and change under differing conditions of light and nutrient supply. Functional Ecology 13:611622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PEACE, W. J. H. & GRUBB, P. J. 1982. Interaction of light and mineral nutrient supply in the growth of Impatiens parviflora. New Phytologist 90:127150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POORTER, H. & NAGEL, O. 2000. The role of biomass allocation in the growth response of plants to different levels of light, CO2, nutrients and water: a quantitative review. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 27:595607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RICHARDS, P. W. 1996. The tropical rain forest. (Second edition). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 599 pp.Google Scholar
SACK, L. & GRUBB, P. J. 2002. The combined impacts of deep shade and drought on the growth and biomass allocation of shade tolerant woody seedlings. Oecologia 131:175185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SHIPLEY, B., LECHOWICZ, M. J., WRIGHT, I. & REICH, P. B. 2006. Fundamental trade-offs generating the worldwide leaf economics spectrum. Ecology 87: 535541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SWAINE, M. D. 1996. The ecology of tropical forest seedlings. The Parthenon Publishing Group, Carnforth. 372 pp.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, W. A., KRIEDEMANN, P. E. & CRAIG, I. E. 1992. Photosynthetic response to light and nutrients in sun-tolerant and shade-tolerant rainforest trees. I. Growth, leaf anatomy and nutrient content. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 19:118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TURNER, I. M. 1990. The seedling survivorship and growth of three Shorea species in a Malaysian tropical rain-forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:469478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VEENENDAAL, E. M., SWAINE, M. D., LECHA, R. T., WALSH, M. F., ABEBRESE, I. K. & OWUSU-AFRIYIE, K. 1996. Responses of West African forest tree seedlings to irradiance and soil fertility. Functional Ecology 10:501511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WALSH, R. P. D. & NEWBERY, D. M. 1999. The ecoclimatology of Danum, Sabah, in the context of the world's rainforest regions, with particular reference to dry periods and their impacts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B 354:18691883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WALTERS, M. B. & REICH, P. B. 1997. Growth of Acer saccharum seedlings in deeply shaded understories of northern Wisconsin: effects of nitrogen and water availability. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 27:237247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WINDSOR, D. M. 1990. Climate and moisture variability in a tropical forest: long-term records from Barro Colorado Island, Panamá. Smithsonian Contributions to Earth Science 29:1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRIGHT, S. J. 1991. Seasonal drought and the phenology of understory shrubs in a tropical moist forest. Ecology 72:16431657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRIGHT, S. J. & CORNEJO, F. H. 1990. Seasonal drought and leaf fall in a tropical forest. Ecology 71:11651175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WRIGHT, S. J., MULLER-LANDAU, H. C., CONDIT, R. G. & HUBBELL, S. P. 2003. Gap-dependent recruitment, realized vital rates, and size distributions of tropical trees. Ecology 84:31743185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YAVITT, J. B. & WRIGHT, S. J. 2001. Drought and irrigation effects on fine root dynamics in a tropical moist forest, Panama. Biotropica 33:421434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YAVITT, J. B. & WRIGHT, S. J. 2002. Charge characteristics of soil in a lowland tropical moist forest in Panama in response to dry-season irrigation. Australian Journal of Soil Research 40:269281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YAVITT, J. B., WRIGHT, S. J. & WIEDER, R. K. 2004. Seasonal drought and dry-season irrigation influence leaf-litter nutrients and soil enzymes in a moist, lowland forest in Panama. Austral Ecology 29:177188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Seedling growth responses to water and nutrient augmentation in the understorey of a lowland moist forest, Panama
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Seedling growth responses to water and nutrient augmentation in the understorey of a lowland moist forest, Panama
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Seedling growth responses to water and nutrient augmentation in the understorey of a lowland moist forest, Panama
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *