Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

The effect of urbanization on the functional and scale-sensitive diversity of bird assemblages in Central India

  • Manoj Kale (a1), Nandkishor Dudhe (a2), Marco Ferrante (a3), Tatiana Ivanova (a4), Raju Kasambe (a2), Irina S. Trukhanova (a5), Prosun Bhattacharya (a1) and Gabor L. Lövei (a3)...
Abstract:

Diversity changes can be evaluated at various spatial scales, and the relationship between changes in diversity at the local, landscape and regional scales is not evident. The overall patterns of functional and beta diversity of bird assemblages were evaluated along a five-stage urbanization gradient, censused over the months of January to April in the years 2010–2013, in and around Amravati city, Deccan Plateau, Central India. We expected the abundance of large and predatory species to decline along the gradient, and urbanization to homogenize species richness at the landscape level. Overall, 112,829 birds belonging to 89 species were identified in the region, and species richness decreased from the rural forest (73 species) to more urbanized areas (lowest at the centre of Amravaty city with 29 species). Along the urbanization gradient, bird assemblages contained more small species, and the share of frugivorous and omnivorous species also increased, while that of insectivorous species decreased. Diversity partitioning indicated that of the overall pattern, local (alpha) diversity accounted for 50.1% of the total (gamma) diversity, and urbanization stages another 36.2%; the contribution of within-stage, local diversity was rather small (2.7%), indicating fairly homogeneous assemblages.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The effect of urbanization on the functional and scale-sensitive diversity of bird assemblages in Central India
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The effect of urbanization on the functional and scale-sensitive diversity of bird assemblages in Central India
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The effect of urbanization on the functional and scale-sensitive diversity of bird assemblages in Central India
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author. Email: gabor.lovei@agro.au.dk
References
Hide All
ALI, S. 2002. The book of Indian birds. (Thirteenth, revised edition). Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai. 354 pp.
AHRNÉ, K., BENGTSSON, J. & ELMQVIST, T. 2009. Bumble bees (Bombus spp.) along a gradient of increasing urbanization. PLoS ONE 4:e5574.
ANDERSON, M. J., CRIST, T. O., CHASE, J. M., VELLEND, M., INOUYE, B. D., FREESTONE, A. L., SANDERS, N. J., CORNELL, H. V., COMITA, L. S., DAVIES, K. F., HARRISON, S. P., KRAFT, N. J. B., STEGEN, J. & SWENSON, N. G. 2011. Navigating the multiple meaning of β diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecology Letters 14:1928.
ARONSON, M. F. J., LA SORTE, F. A., NILON, C. H., KATTI, M., GODDARD, M. A., LEPCZYK, C. A., WARREN, P. S., WILLIAMS, N. S. G., CILLIERS, S., CLARKSON, B., DOBBS, C., DOLAN, R., HEDBLOM, M., KLOTZ, S., KOOIJMANS, J. L., KÜHN, I., MACGREGOR-FORS, I., MCDONNELL, M., MÖRTBERG, U., PYŠEK, P., SIEBERT, S., SUSHINSKY, J., WERNER, P. & WINTER, M. 2014. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 281:20133330.
BARKER, R. J., SCHOFIELD, M. R., LINK, W. A. & SAUER, J. R. 2017. On the reliability of N-mixture models for count data. Biometrics 74:369377.
BLAIR, R. B. 1996. Land use and avian species diversity along an urban gradient. Ecological Applications 6:506519.
BUTCHART, S. H. M., WALPOLE, M., COLLEN, B., VAN STRIEN, A., SCHARLEMANN, J. P. W., ALMOND, R. E. A., BAILLIE, J. E. M., BOMHARD, B., BROWN, C., BRUNO, J., CARPENTER, K. E., CARR, G. M., CHANSON, J., CHENERY, A. M., CSIRKE, J., DAVIDSON, N. C., DENTENER, F., FOSTER, M., GALLI, A., GALLOWAY, J. N., GENOVESI, P., GREGORY, R. D., HOCKINGS, M., KAPOS, V., LAMARQUE, J. F. ET AL. 2010. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:11641168.
CARDILLO, M., MACE, G. M., JONES, K. E., BIELBY, J., BININDA-EMONDS, O. R. P., SECHREST, W. & ORME, D. L. 2005. Multiple causes of high extinction rate in large mammal species. Science 309:12391241.
CHACE, J. F. & WALSH, J. J. 2006. Urban effects on native avifauna: a review. Landscape Urban Planning 74:4669.
CHAMPION, H. G. & SETH, K. S. 1968. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Government of India Press, New Delhi. 404 pp.
CHAZDON, R. L., PERES, C. A., DENT, D., SHEIL, D., LUGO, A. E., LAMB, D., STORK, N. E. & MILLER, S. 2009. The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests. Conservation Biology 23:14061417.
CLERGEAU, P., SAVARD, J.-P. L., MENNECHEZ, G. & FALARDEAU, G. 1998. Bird abundance and diversity along an urban-rural gradient: a comparative study between two cities on different continents. The Condor 100:413425.
CLERGEAU, P., CROCI, S., JOKIMÄKI, J., KAISANLAHTI-JOKIMÄKI, M-L & DINETTI, M. 2006. Avifauna homogenisation by urbanisation: analysis at different European latitudes. Biological Conservation 127:336344.
CRIST, T. O. & VEECH, J. A. 2006. Additive partitioning of rarefaction curves and species-areas relationships: unifying α-, β- and γ-diversity with sample size and habitat area. Ecology Letters 9:923932.
DIAZ, I. V., ARMESTO, J. J., REID, S., SIEVING, K. E. & WILLSON, M. F. 2005. Linking forest structure and composition: avian diversity in successional forests of Chiloé Island, Chile. Biological Conservation 123:91101.
DUARTE, A., ADAMS, M. J., PETERSON, J. T. 2018. Fitting N-mixture models to count data with unmodeled heterogeneity bias, diagnostics, and alternative approaches. Ecological Modelling 374:5159.
EIGENBROD, F., BELL, V. A., DAVIES, H. N., HEINEMYER, A., ARMSWORTH, P. R. & GASTON, K. J. 2011. The impact of projected increases in urbanization on ecosystem services. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 278: 23012308.
ELEK, Z. & LÖVEI, G. L. 2007. Patterns in ground beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae) assemblages along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark. Acta Oecologica 32:104111.
FERRANTE, M., LO CACCIATO, A. & LÖVEI, G. L. 2014. Quantifying predation pressure along an urbanisation gradient in Denmark using artificial caterpillars. European Journal of Entomology 111:649654.
GALUSHIN, W. M. 1971. A huge urban population of birds of prey in Delhi, India. Ibis 113:522.
GIBSON, L., LEE, T. M., KOH, L. P., BROOK, B. W., GARDNER, T. A., BARLOW, J., PERES, C. A., BRADSHAW, C. J. A., LAURANCE, W. F., LOVEJOY, T. E. & SODHI, N. S. 2011. Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378383.
GRIMMETT, R., INSKIPP, C. & INSKIPP, T. 2001. Pocket guide to the birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press, New Delhi. 384 pp.
HENDERSON, P. A. & SOUTHWOOD, T. R. E. 2016. Ecological methods. (Fourth edition). John Wiley & Son, Chichester. 632 pp.
HUSTON, M. A. 1994. Biological diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 682 pp.
IZENMAN, A. J. 2008. Modern multivariate statistical techniques. Regression, classification and manifold learning. Springer, Berlin. 740 pp.
JOKIMÄKI, J. & SUHONEN, J. 1993. Effects of urbanization on the breeding bird species richness in Finland: a biogeographical comparison. Ornis Fennica 70:7177.
LANDE, R. 1996. Statistics and partitioning of species diversity, and similarity among multiple communities. Oikos 76:513.
LIKER, A., PAPP, Z., BÓKONY, V. & LENDVAI, Á. Z. 2008. Lean birds in the city: body size and condition of house sparrows along the urbanization gradient. Journal of Animal Ecology 77:789795.
LIN, Y.-P., CHANG, C.-R., CHU, H.-J. & CHENG, B.-Y. 2011. Identifying the spatial mixture distribution of bird diversity across urban and suburban areas in the metropolis: a case study in Taipei Basin of Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning 102:156163.
LÖVEI, G. L. & SUNDERLAND, K. D. 1996. The ecology and behaviour of ground beetles. Annual Review of Entomology 41:231256.
MACGREGOR-FORS, I. 2008. Relation between habitat attributes and bird richness in a western Mexico suburb. Landscape and Urban Planning 84:9298.
MAGURA, T., LÖVEI, G. L. & TÓTHMÉRÉSZ, B. 2010. Does urbanisation decrease diversity in ground beetle (Carabidae) assemblages? Global Ecology and Biogeography 19:1626.
MAGURRAN, A. E. 2003. Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford. 264 pp.
MARZLUFF, J. M. 2001. Worldwide urbanization and its effects on birds. Pp. 1947 in Marzluff, J. M., Bowman, R. & Donnelly, R. (eds). Avian ecology in an urbanizing world. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell.
MARZLUFF, J. M. 2005. Island biogeography for an urbanizing world: how extinction and colonization may determine biological diversity in human-dominated landscapes. Urban Ecosystems 8:157177.
MCKINNEY, M. L. 2002. Urbanization, biodiversity and conservation. Bioscience 52:883890.
MCKINNEY, M. L. 2006. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biological Conservation 127:247260.
MCKINNEY, M. L. 2008. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems 11:161176.
MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENT 2005. Ecosystem and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. 155 pp.
NEWTON, I. 1994. The role of nest sites in limiting the numbers of hole nesting birds: a review. Biological Conservation 70:265276.
PETERS, R. H. 1986. The ecological implications of body size. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 329 pp.
PICKETT, S. T., CADENASSO, M., GROVE, J., NILON, C., POUYAT, R., ZIPPERER, W. & COSTANZA, R. 2001. Urban ecological systems: linking terrestrial ecological, physical, and socioeconomic components of metropolitan areas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:127157.
PUPPIM DE OLIVEIRA, J. A., BALABAN, O., DOLL, C. N. H., MORENO-PEÑARANDA, R., GASPARATOS, A., IOSSIFOVA, D. & SUWA, A. 2010. Cities and biodiversity: perspectives and governance challenges for implementing the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) at the city level. Biological Conservation 144:13021313.
RODEWALD, A. D., KEARNS, L. J. & SHUSTACK, D. P. 2013. Consequences of urbanizing landscapes to reproductive performance of birds in remnant forests. Biological Conservation 160:3239.
SENGUPTA, S., MONDAL, M. & BASU, P. 2014. Bird species assemblages across a rural urban gradient around Kolkata, India. Urban Ecosystems 17:585596.
SOL, D., GONZÁLEZ-LAGOS, C., MOREIRA, D., MASPONS, J. & LAPIEDRA, O. 2014. Urbanisation tolerance and the loss of avian diversity. Ecology Letters 17:942950.
UNITED NATIONS. 2014. World urbanization prospects: the 2014 revision. Highlights. (ST/ESA/SER.A/352). United Nations, New York. 32 pp.
VERNER, J. 1985. Assessment of counting techniques. Current Ornithology 2:247302.
WAGNER, L. N. (ed.) 2008. Urbanization: 21st century issues and challenges. Nova Science Publishers, New York. 242 pp.
WILMAN, H., BELMAKER, J., SIMPSON, J., DE LA ROSA, C., RIVADENEIRA, M. M. & JETZ, W. 2014. EltonTraits 1.0: species-level foraging attributes of the world's birds and mammals. Ecology 95:2027.
ZUUR, A. F., IENO, E. I., WALKER, N. J. & SAVELIEV, A. 2009. GML and GAM for count data. Pp. 209243 in Gail, M., Krickeberg, K., Samet, J. M., Tsiatis, A. & Wong, W. (eds). Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. Springer Science and Business Media, New York.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Tropical Ecology
  • ISSN: 0266-4674
  • EISSN: 1469-7831
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-tropical-ecology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed