Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Structure of mutualistic ant–treehopper interactions in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest

  • Yve Eligiêr Alves Gadelha (a1), Wesley Dáttilo (a2), Olivia Evangelista (a3) and Benedito Cortês Lopes (a4)
Abstract:
Abstract:

Ant–treehopper mutualisms are centred on the availability of honeydew, a sugary fluid offered by treehoppers to attract ants, which respond by defending their hosts against predators and parasitoids. However, due to differences in the treehopper social behaviour (i.e. the amount of food resource available) ants can monopolize treehopper aggregations in many ways. Here we evaluated the topological structure of quantitative ant–treehopper interaction networks in three Brazilian Atlantic Forest localities. Moreover, we specifically investigated the role of ant recruitment strategy and treehopper behaviour in the structure of these networks. For this, we sampled ant–treehopper interactions along representative transects (6 km per site) within each studied site and recorded the mean number of individuals of treehopper and ant species. We found that independent of variation in environmental factors among study sites, ant–treehopper networks were highly compartmentalized (Mean ± SD: Q = 0.34 ± 0.1) when compared with null models, and exhibit low connectance (C = 0.18 ± 0.01) and specialization (H2’ = 0.36 ± 0.08) values. In addition, we also observed that larger aggregations of treehoppers interacted with a higher number of ant species and ants that were locally dominant and showed massive recruitment interacted with a larger number of treehopper species. In summary, our results illustrate the importance of foraging strategies in shaping ecological interactions in tropical environments.

Copyright
Corresponding author
1Corresponding author. Email: yvegadelha@gmail.com
References
Hide All
ALMEIDA-NETO M. & ULRICH W. 2011. A straightforward computational approach for measuring nestedness using quantitative matrices. Environmental Modelling and Software 26:173178.
ALVARES C. A., STAPE J. L., SENTELHAS P. C., GONÇALVES J. L. M. & SPAROVEK G. 2013. Köppen's climate classification map for Brazil. Meteorologische Zeitschrift: Fast Track Article:118.
BARRIGA P. O., DORMANN C. F., GBUR E. E. & SAGERS C. R. 2015. Community structure and ecological specialization in plant-ant interactions. Journal of Tropical Ecology 31:325334.
BASCOMPTE J., JORDANO P., MELIAN C. J. & OLESEN J.M. 2003. The nested assembly of plant-animal mutualistic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 100:93839387.
BASCOMPTE J., JORDANO P. & OLESEN J. M. 2006. Asymmetric coevolutionary networks facilitate biodiversity maintenance. Science 312:431433.
BATAGELJ V. & MRVAR A. 1998. Pajek – a program for large network analysis. Connections 21:4757.
BENÍTEZ-MALVIDO J. & DÁTTILO W. 2015. Interaction intimacy of pathogens and herbivores with their plant hosts influences the topological structure of ecological networks in different ways. American Journal of Botany 102:18.
BELLAY S., OLIVEIRA E. F., ALMEIDA-NETO M., ABDALLAH V. D., AZEVEDO R. K., TAKEMOTO R. M. & LUQUE J. L. 2015. The patterns of organisation and structure of interactions in a fish-parasite network of a Neotropical river. International Journal for Parasitology 45:549557.
BLIGHT O., ORGEAS J., TORRE F. & PROVOST E. 2014. Competitive dominance in the organisation of Mediterranean ant communities. Ecological Entomology 39:595602.
BLÜTHGEN N. & FIEDLER K. 2004. Competition for composition: lessons from nectar-feeding ant communities. Ecology 85:14791485.
BLÜTHGEN N., VERHAAGH M., GOITIA W., JAFFE K., MORAWETZ W. & BARTHLOTT W. 2000. How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia 125:229240.
BLÜTHGEN N., MENZEL F. & BLÜTHGEN N. 2006. Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecology 6 (9):112.
BLÜTHGEN N., MENZEL F., HOVESTADT T., FIALA B. & BLÜTHGEN N. 2007. Specialization, constraints, and conflicting interests in mutualistic networks. Current Biology 17:341346.
CLEMENTE M. A., LANGE D., DEL-CLARO K., PREZOTO F., CAMPOS N. R. & BARBOSA B. C. 2012. Flower-visiting social wasps and plants interaction: network pattern and environmental complexity. Psyche 2012:478431.
CORSO G. & BRITTON N. F. 2014. Comparisons and contrasts between asymmetry and nestedness in interacting ecological networks. Open Journal of Ecology 4:653661.
DÁTTILO W., RICO-GRAY V., RODRIGUES D. J. & IZZO T. J. 2013a. Soil and vegetation features determine the nested pattern of ant-plant networks in a tropical rainforest. Ecological Entomology 38:374380.
DÁTTILO W., GUIMARÃES P. R. & IZZO T. J. 2013b. Spatial structure of ant-plant mutualistic networks. Oikos 122:16431648.
DÁTTILO W., SÁNCHEZ-GALVÁN I., LANGE D., DEL-CLARO K., & RICO-GRAY V. 2014a. Importance of interaction frequency in analysis of ant-plant networks in tropical environments. Journal of Tropical Ecology 30:165168.
DÁTTILO W., DÍAZ-CASTELAZO C. & RICO-GRAY V. 2014b. Ant dominance hierarchy determines the nested pattern in ant-plant networks. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 113:405414.
DEL-CLARO K. & OLIVEIRA P. S. 1999. Ant-homoptera interactions in a neotropical savanna: the honeydew-producing treehopper Guayaquila xiphias (Membracidae) and is associated ant fauna on Didymopanax vinosum (Araliaceae). Biotropica 31:135144.
DORMANN C. F. & STRAUSS R. 2014. A method for detecting modules in quantitative bipartite networks. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5 (1):9098.
DORMANN C. F., GRUBER B. & FRUND J. 2008. Introducing the bipartite package: analyzing ecological networks. R News 8:811.
FAGUNDES R., RIBEIRO S. P. & DEL-CLARO K. 2013. Tending-ants increase survivorship and reproductive success of Calloconophora pugionata Dietrich (Hemiptera, Membracidae), a trophobiont herbivore of Myrcia obovata O. Berg (Myrtales, Myrtaceae). Sociobiology 60:1119.
FENG W. & TAKEMOTO K. 2014. Heterogeneity in ecological mutualistic networks dominantly determines community stability. Scientific Reports 4 (5912):111.
FERNÁNDEZ F. 2003. Subfamília Myrmicinae. Pp. 307330 in Fernández P. (ed.). Introducción a las Hormigas de la Región Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá.
JAMES A., PITCHFORD J. W. & PLANK M. J. 2012. Disentangling nestedness from models of ecological complexity. Nature 487:227230.
KAMINSKI L. A., FREITAS A. V. L. & OLIVEIRA P. S. 2010. Interaction between mutualisms: ant-tended butterflies exploit enemy-free space provided by ant-treehopper associations. American Naturalist 176:322334.
KATAYAMA N., TSUCHIDA T., HOJO M. K. & OHGUSHI T. 2013. Aphid genotype determines intensity of ant attendance: do endosymbionts and honeydew composition matter? Annals of the Entomological Society of America 106:761770.
LANGE D. & DEL-CLARO K. 2014. Ant-plant interaction in a tropical savanna: may the network structure vary over time and influence on the outcomes of associations? PLoS ONE 9:110.
LANGE D., DÁTTILO W. & DEL-CLARO K. 2013. Influence of extrafloral nectary phenology on ant-plant mutualistic networks in a neotropical savanna. Ecological Entomology 38:463469.
LIN C. P. 2006. Social behaviour and life history of membracine treehoppers. Journal of Natural History 40:18871907.
LONGINO J. T. 2003. The Crematogaster (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae) of Costa Rica. Zootaxa 151:1150.
MELLO M. A. R., BEZERRA E. L. S. & MACHADO I. C. 2013. Functional roles of Centridini oil bees and Malpighiaceae oil flowers in biome-wide pollination networks. Biotropica 45:4553.
MORALES M. A. & BEAL A. L. H. 2006. Effects of host plant quality and ant tending for treehopper Publilia concave. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99:545552.
MOREIRA V. S. S. & DEL-CLARO K. 2005. The outcomes of an ant-treehopper association on Solanum lycocarpum St. Hill: increased membracid fecundity and reduced damage by chewing herbivores. Neotropical Entomology 34:881887.
NAUMANN K. 1994. An occurrence of two exotic ant (Formicidae) species in British Columbia. Journal of the Entomological Society of British Columbia 91:6970.
PANDOLFO C., BRAGA H. J., SILVA V. P., MASSIGNAM A. M., PEREIRA E. S., THOMÉ V. M. R. & VALCI F. V. 2002. Atlas climatológico digital do Estado de Santa Catarina. Epagri, Florianópolis, Brasil.
PASSMORE H. A., BRUNA E. M., HEREDIA S. M. & VASCONCELOS H. L. 2012. Resilient networks of ant-plant mutualisms in Amazonian forest fragments. PLoS ONE 7:18.
PIGOZZO C. M. & VIANA B. F. 2010. Estrutura da rede de interações ente flores e abelhas em ambiente de Caatinga. Oecologia Australis 14:100114.
RICO-GRAY V. 1993. Use of plant-derived food resources by ants in the dry tropical lowlands of coastal Veracruz, Mexico. Biotropica 25:301315.
RICO-GRAY V., DIÁZ-CASTELAZO C., RAMÍREZ-HERNÁNDEZ A., GUIMARÃES P. R. & HOLLAND J. N. 2012. Abiotic factors shape temporal variation in the structure of an ant-plant network. Arthropod–Plant Interactions 6:289295.
ROBINSON K. M., HAUZY C., LOEUILLE N. & ALBRECTSEN B. R. 2015. Relative impacts of environmental variation and evolutionary history on the nestedness and modularity of tree-herbivore networks. Ecology and Evolution 5 (14):28982915.
RODERJAN C. T. & KUNIYOSHI Y. S. 1988. Macrozoneamento florístico da Área de Proteção Ambiental de Guaraqueçaba. FUPEF, Curitiba, Brazil.
ROHR R. P., SAAVEDRA S. & BASCOMPTE J. 2014. On the structural stability of mutualistic systems. Science 345:416426.
SANTOS G. M. M., AGUIAR C. M. L. & MELLO M. A. R. 2010. Flower-visiting guild associated with the Caatinga flora: trophic interaction networks formed by social bees and social wasps with plants. Apidologie 41:466475.
SANTOS G. M. M., DÁTTILO W. & PRESLEY S. J. 2014. The seasonal dynamic of ant-flower networks in a semi-arid tropical environment. Ecological Entomology 39:674683.
SCHOEREDER J. H., SOBRINHO T. G., MADUREIRA M. S., RIBAS C. R. & OLIVEIRA P. S. 2010. The arboreal ant community visiting extrafloral nectaries in the Neotropical cerrado savanna. Terrestrial Arthropod Reviews 3:327.
STAAB M., BLÜTHGEN N. & KLEIN A. M. 2014. Tree diversity alters the structure of a tri-trophic network in a biodiversity experiment. Oikos 124:827834.
STANICZENKO P. P. A., KOPP J. C. & ALLESINA S. 2013. The ghost of nestedness in ecological networks. Nature Communications 4:13901396.
STRONA G. & VEECH J. A. 2015. A new measure of ecological network structure based on node overlap and segregation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6:907915.
SUWEIS S., SIMINI F., BANAVAR J. R. & MARITAN A. 2013. Emergence of structural and dynamical properties of ecological mutualistic networks. Nature 500:449452.
VÁZQUEZ D. P., MELIÁN C. J., WILLIAMS N. M., BLÜTHGEN N., KRASNOV B. R. & POULIN R. 2007. Species abundance and asymmetric interaction strength in ecological networks. Oikos 116:120127.
VIZENTIN-BUGONI J., MARUYAMA P. K., DEBASTIANI V. J., DUARTE L. S., DALSGAARD B. & SAZIMA M. 2016. Influences of sampling effort on detected patterns and structuring processes of a Neotropical plant-hummingbird network. Journal of Animal Ecology 85:262272.
WETTERER J. K. & PORTER S. D. 2003. The little fire ant, Wasmannia auropunctata: distribution, impact and control. Sociobiology 41:141.
WOOD T. K. 1993. Diversity in the New World Membracidae. Annual Review of Entomology 38:409435.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Tropical Ecology
  • ISSN: 0266-4674
  • EISSN: 1469-7831
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-tropical-ecology
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 95 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 261 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.