Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Kant on the Independence of the Moral Law from Sensibility

  • Laura Papish (a1)
Abstract

There are several senses in which Kant’s moral law is independent of sensibility. This paper is devoted mainly to Kant’s account of ‘physical conditions independence’, or the idea that the moral law can compel us to pursue ends that might be impossible to realize empirically. Since this idea has received little attention from commentators, this paper addresses both its textual basis in Kant’s writings and its overall philosophical viability.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Email: LauraPapish@gwu.edu
References
Hide All
Allison, Henry (1990) Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Allison, Henry (2001) Kant’s Theory of Taste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baxley, Anne Margaret (2005) ‘The Practical Significance of Taste in Kant’s “Critique of Judgment”: Love of Natural Beauty as a Mark of Moral Character’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 63/1, 3345.
Beck, Lewis White (1960) A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Grenberg, Jeanine (2001) ‘Feeling, Desire and Interest in Kant’s Theory of Action’. Kant-Studien, 92/2, 153179.
Guyer, Paul (1979) Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Guyer, Paul (2000) Kant on Freedom, Happiness, and Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1975) Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A. V. Miller. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herman, Barbara (2007) Moral Literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (1996a) Critique of Practical Reason. In Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (1996b) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. In Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (1996c) Metaphysics of Morals from Immanuel Kant: Practical Philosophy, ed. and trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (2000) Critique of the Power of Judgment, ed. Paul Guyer, trans. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Korsgaard, Christine (1989) ‘Morality as Freedom’. In Yirmiyahu Yovel (ed.), Kant’s Practical Philosophy Reconsidered: Papers Presented at the Seventh Jerusalem Philosophical Encounter (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), pp. 2348.
Korsgaard, Christine (2009) Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lavin, Douglas (2004) ‘Practical Reason and the Possibility of Error’. Ethics, 114/3, 424457.
Murdoch, Iris (2001) The Sovereignty of Good. London: Routledge.
Potter, Nelson (1998) ‘Kant on Ends that are at the Same Time Duties’. In Ruth Chadwick (ed.), Immanuel Kant: Critical Assessments (London: Routledge), pp. 100115.
Rawls, John (2000) Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stern, Robert (2004) ‘Does “Ought” Imply “Can”? And Did Kant Think it Does?’. Utilitas, 16, 4261.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Kantian Review
  • ISSN: 1369-4154
  • EISSN: 2044-2394
  • URL: /core/journals/kantian-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed