Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Kantian Phenomenalism Without Berkeleyan Idealism

  • Tim Jankowiak (a1)
Abstract

Phenomenalist interpretations of Kant are out of fashion. The most common complaint from anti-phenomenalist critics is that a phenomenalist reading of Kant would collapse Kantian idealism into Berkeleyan idealism. This would be unacceptable because Berkeleyan idealism is incompatible with core elements of Kant’s empirical realism. In this paper, I argue that not all phenomenalist readings threaten empirical realism. First, I distinguish several variants of phenomenalism, and then show that Berkeley’s idealism is characterized by his commitment to most of them. I then make the case that two forms of phenomenalism are consistent with Kant’s empirical realism. The comparison between Kant and Berkeley runs throughout the paper, with special emphasis on the significance of their theories of intentionality.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Email: tjankowiak@towson.edu
References
Hide All
Abela, Paul (2002) Kant’s Empirical Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allais, Lucy (2004) ‘Kant’s One World: Interpreting Transcendental Idealism’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 12 (4), 655684.
Allais, Lucy (2007) ‘Kant’s Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 45 (3), 459484.
Allais, Lucy (2015) Manifest Reality: Kant’s Idealism and his Realism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Allison, Henry (1973) ‘Kant’s Critique of Berkeley’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 11 (1), 4363.
Ameriks, Karl (2006) Kant and the Historical Turn: Philosophy as Critical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aquila, Richard (1983) Representational Mind. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Aquila, Richard (2003) ‘Hans Vaihinger and Some Recent Intentionalist Readings of Kant’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 41 (2), 231250.
Bennett, Jonathan (1966) Kant’s Analytic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Berkeley, George (1948–57) The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne. Ed. A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessup. London: Thomas Nelson & Sons.
Berkeley, George (1998a) A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge. Ed. Jonathan Dancy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Berkeley, George (1998b) Three Dialogues between Hylas and Philonous. Ed. Jonathan Dancy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Collins, Arthur (1999) Possible Experience: Understanding Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Dicker, Georges (1982) ‘The Concept of Immediate Perception in Berkeley’s Immaterialism’. In C. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), pp. 4868.
Emundts, Dina (2008) ‘Kant’s Critique of Berkeley’s Concept of Objectivity’. In Daniel Garber and Beatrice Longuenesse (eds), Kant and the Early Moderns (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008), pp. 117141.
Gallois, Andre (1974) ‘Berkeley’s Master Argument’. Philosophical Review, 83 (1), 5569.
George, Rolf (1981) ‘Kant’s Sensationism’. Synthese, 47 (2), 229255.
Haag, Johannes (2007) Erfahrung und Gegenstand: das Verhälthis von Sinnlichkeit und Verstand. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann.
Hall, Bryan (2010) ‘Appearances and the Problem of Affection in Kant’. Kantian Review, 14 (2), 3866.
Hanna, Robert (2001) Kant and the Foundations of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jankowiak, Tim (2014) ‘Sensations as Representations in Kant’. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22 (3), 492513.
Jankowiak, Tim (2016) ‘Intentionality and Sensory Consciousness in Kant’. Journal of Philosophical Research, 41, 623–49.
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, Immanuel (2002) ‘Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science’. Trans. Michael Friedman in Henry Allison and Peter Heath (eds), Theoretical Philosophy since 1781 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 181279.
Langton, Rae (1998) Kantian Humility: Our Ignorance of Things in Themselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Muehlman, Robert (1992) Berkeley’s Ontology, Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Co.
Pappas, George (1982) ‘Berkeley, Perception, and Common Sense’. In C. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), pp. 321.
Pappas, George (2000) Berkeley’s Thought. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Park, Désirée (1982) ‘On Taking Ideas Seriously’. In C. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1982), pp. 3547.
Pereboom, Derk (1988) ‘Kant on Intentionality’. Synthese, 77 (3), 321352.
Pitcher, George (1986) ‘Berkeley and the Perception of Objects’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 24 (1), 99105.
Rickless, Samuel (2013) Kant’s Argument for Idealism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sellars, Wilfrid (1967) Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.
Sellars, Wilfrid (2007) ‘The Role of Imagination in Kant’s Theory of Experience’. In Robert Brandom and Kevin Scharp (eds), In the Space of Reasons: Selected Essays of Wilfrid Sellars (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007), pp. 454466.
Turbayne, Colin (1955) ‘Kant’s Refutation of Dogmatic Idealism’. Philosophical Quarterly, 5, 225244.
Vaihinger, Hans (1892) Commentar zu Kants Kritik der reinen Vernunft, vol. 2. Stuttgart: Union Deutsche Verlagsgesellschaft.
Van Cleve, James (1999) Problems from Kant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vinci, Thomas (2014) Space, Geometry, and Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilson, Margaret (1999) ‘The “Phenomenalisms” of Berkeley and Kant’. In Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 294305.
Winkler, Kenneth (1989) Berkeley: An Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Winkler, Kenneth (2008) ‘Berkeley and Kant’. In Daniel Garber and Beatrice Longuenesse (eds), Kant and the Early Moderns (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008), pp. 142171.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Kantian Review
  • ISSN: 1369-4154
  • EISSN: 2044-2394
  • URL: /core/journals/kantian-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed