Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-ns2hh Total loading time: 0.525 Render date: 2022-10-05T14:24:58.008Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue true

Ontology evolution: a process-centric survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 August 2013

Fouad Zablith
Affiliation:
Olayan School of Business, American University of Beirut, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, 1107 2020, Beirut, Lebanon; e-mail: fouad.zablith@aub.edu.lb
Grigoris Antoniou
Affiliation:
Institute of Computer Science, FORTH, PO Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece; e-mail: antoniou@ics.forth.gr, fgeo@ics.forth.gr, kondylak@ics.forth.gr, dp@ics.forth.gr
Mathieu d'Aquin
Affiliation:
Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, United Kingdom; e-mail: m.daquin@open.ac.uk, e.motta@open.ac.uk
Giorgos Flouris
Affiliation:
Institute of Computer Science, FORTH, PO Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece; e-mail: antoniou@ics.forth.gr, fgeo@ics.forth.gr, kondylak@ics.forth.gr, dp@ics.forth.gr
Haridimos Kondylakis
Affiliation:
Institute of Computer Science, FORTH, PO Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece; e-mail: antoniou@ics.forth.gr, fgeo@ics.forth.gr, kondylak@ics.forth.gr, dp@ics.forth.gr
Enrico Motta
Affiliation:
Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, United Kingdom; e-mail: m.daquin@open.ac.uk, e.motta@open.ac.uk
Dimitris Plexousakis
Affiliation:
Institute of Computer Science, FORTH, PO Box 1385, GR 71110, Heraklion, Greece; e-mail: antoniou@ics.forth.gr, fgeo@ics.forth.gr, kondylak@ics.forth.gr, dp@ics.forth.gr
Marta Sabou
Affiliation:
Department of New Media Technology, MODUL University Vienna, Am Kahlenberg 1, 1190 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: marta.sabou@modul.ac.at

Abstract

Ontology evolution aims at maintaining an ontology up to date with respect to changes in the domain that it models or novel requirements of information systems that it enables. The recent industrial adoption of Semantic Web techniques, which rely on ontologies, has led to the increased importance of the ontology evolution research. Typical approaches to ontology evolution are designed as multiple-stage processes combining techniques from a variety of fields (e.g., natural language processing and reasoning). However, the few existing surveys on this topic lack an in-depth analysis of the various stages of the ontology evolution process. This survey extends the literature by adopting a process-centric view of ontology evolution. Accordingly, we first provide an overall process model synthesized from an overview of the existing models in the literature. Then we survey the major approaches to each of the steps in this process and conclude on future challenges for techniques aiming to solve that particular stage.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alani, H. 2006. Position paper: ontology construction from online ontologies. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW-06), Les Carr, David De Roure, Arun Iyengar, Carole A. Goble & Michael Dahlin (eds). ACM, Edinburgh, Scotland, 491–495.Google Scholar
Alani, H., Harris, S., O'Neil, B. 2006. Winnowing ontologies based on application use. In Proceedings of 3rd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-06), Budva, Montenegro.Google Scholar
Alchourron, C., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D. 1985. On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allocca, C., d'Aquin, M., Motta, E. 2009. Detecting different versions of ontologies in large ontology repositories. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-09), Chantilly, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Angeletou, S., Sabou, M., Motta, E. 2008. Semantically enriching folksonomies with FLOR. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Collective Semantics: Collective Intelligence and the Semantic Web (CISWeb-08), Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.Google Scholar
Antoniou, G., Harmelen, F. V. 2004. A Semantic Web Primer. The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Auer, S., Herre, H. 2006. A versioning and evolution framework for RDF knowledge bases. In Perspectives of Systems Informatics, 6th International Andrei Ershov Memorial Conference (PSI-06), Revised Papers, Akademgorodok, Novosibirsk, Russia.Google Scholar
Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds) 2002. The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Banerjee, S., Pedersen, T. 2002. An adapted Lesk algorithm for word sense disambiguation using WordNet. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing, Alexander F. Gelbukh (ed.). Mexico, 136–145.Google Scholar
Barbieri, D., Braga, D., Ceri, S., Della Valle, E., Grossniklaus, M. 2009. C-SPARQL: SPARQL for continuous querying. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web, Madrid, Spain, 1061–1062.Google Scholar
Bechhofer, S., Horrocks, I., Goble, C., Stevens, R. 2001. OilEd: a reasonable ontology editor for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 24th German/9th Austrian Conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI-01), Vienna, Austria.Google Scholar
Bechhofer, S., Volz, R., Lord, P. 2003. Cooking the semantic web with the OWL API. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-03), Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, 659–675.Google Scholar
Benferhat, S., Kaci, S., Le Berre, D., Williams, M. 2004. Weakening conflicting information for iterated revision and knowledge integration. Artificial Intelligence 153, 339371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloehdorn, S., Haase, P., Sure, Y., Volker, J. 2006. Ontology evolution. In Semantic Web Technologies—Trends and Research in Ontology-Based Systems, John Davies, Rudi Studer & Paul Warren (eds). John Wiley & Sons, 51–70.Google Scholar
Cimiano, P., Volker, J. 2005. Text2Onto: a framework for ontology learning and data-driven change discovery. In Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, Alicante, Spain, 227–238.Google Scholar
Clark, P., Fellbaum, C., Hobbs, J. 2008. Using and extending WordNet to support question-answering. In Proceedings of the 4th Global WordNet Conference (GWC-08), Szeged, Hungary, 111–119.Google Scholar
Cloran, R., Irwin, B. 2005. Transmitting RDF graph deltas for a cheaper semantic web. In Proceedings of the 8th Annual Southern African Telecommunication Networks and Applications Conference (SATNAC-05), Drakensberg, South Africa.Google Scholar
d'Aquin, M. 2009. Formally measuring agreement and disagreement in ontologies. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP-09), Redondo Beach, California, USA, 145–152.Google Scholar
d'Aquin, M., Baldassarre, C., Gridinoc, L., Angeletou, S., Sabou, M., Motta, E. 2007. Characterizing knowledge on the semantic web with Watson. In Proceedings of the 5th International EON Workshop, Colocated with the International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-07), Busan, Korea.Google Scholar
d'Aquin, M., Baldassarre, C., Gridinoc, L., Sabou, M., Angeletou, S., Motta, E. 2007. Watson: supporting next generation semantic web applications. In Proceedings of the WWW/Internet Conference, Vila Real, Portugal.Google Scholar
Della Valle, E., Ceri, S., Barbieri, D., Braga, D., Campi, A. 2008. A first step towards stream reasoning. In Proceedings of the Future Internet Symposium (FIS-08), Vienna, Austria, 72–81.Google Scholar
Ding, L., Pan, R., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Peng, Y., Kolari, P. 2005. Finding and ranking knowledge on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), Galway, Ireland.Google Scholar
Djedidi, R., Aufaure, M. 2009. Change management patterns (CMP) for ontology evolution process. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-09), Chantilly, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Djedidi, R., Aufaure, M. 2010. ONTO-EVOAL an ontology evolution approach guided by pattern modeling and quality evaluation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems (FoIKS-10), Sofia, Bulgaria, 286–305.Google Scholar
Fellbaum, C. 1998. WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Flouris, G. 2006a. Doctoral Dissertation. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Crete.Google Scholar
Flouris, G. 2006b. On belief change in ontology evolution. AI Communications Journal, 19(4), 395–397.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Huang, Z., Pan, J., Plexousakis, D., Wache, H. 2006. Inconsistencies, negations and changes in ontologies. In Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-06), Boston, Massachusetts, 1295–1300.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Konstantinidis, G., Antoniou, G., Christophides, V. 2013. Formal foundations for RDF/S KB evolution. International Journal on Knowledge and Information Systems (KAIS-13) 35(1), 153191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flouris, G., Manakanatas, D., Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G. 2008. Ontology change: classification and survey. Knowledge Engineering Review 26(2), 117152.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D. 2006. Bridging ontology evolution and belief change. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Hobart, Australia, 486–489.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G. 2004. Generalizing the AGM postulates: preliminary results and applications. In Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR-04), Whistler, Canada, 171–179.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G. 2005. On applying the AGM theory to DLs and OWL. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), 216–231.Google Scholar
Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G. 2006. On generalizing the AGM postulates. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Starting AI Researcher Symposium (STAIRS-06), Riva del Garda, Italy, 132–143.Google Scholar
Franconi, E., Meyer, T., Varzinczak, I. 2010. Semantic diff as the basis for knowledge base versioning. In Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR-10), Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Gabel, T., Sure, Y., Voelker, J. 2004. D3.1.1.a: KAON – ontology management infrastructure. SEKT informal deliverable, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. 1992. Belief Revision: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giacomo, G. D., Lenzerini, M., Poggi, A., Rosati, R. 2007. On the approximation of instance level update and erasure in Description Logics. In Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-07), Vancouver, British Columbia, 403–408.Google Scholar
Giacomo, G. D., Lenzerini, M., Poggi, A., Rosati, R. 2009. On instance-level update and erasure in Description Logic ontologies. Journal of Logic and Computation 19(5), 745770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez-Perez, A., Corcho, O., Fernandez-Lopez, M. 2003. Ontological Engineering: With Examples from the Areas of Knowledge Management, e-Commerce and the Semantic Web. First Edition. Springer.Google Scholar
Gracia, J., d'Aquin, M., Mena, E. 2009. Large scale integration of senses for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW-09), ACM, 611–620.Google Scholar
Grandi, F. 2009. Multi-temporal RDF ontology versioning. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-09), Chantilly, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Gruber, T. 1993. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, C., Hurtado, C., Vaisman, A. 2006. The meaning of erasing in RDF under the Katsuno-Mendelzon approach. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB-06), Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Haase, P., Stojanovic, L. 2005. Consistent evolution of OWL ontologies. In The Semantic Web: Research and Applications, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, 182–197.Google Scholar
Haase, P., Sure, Y. 2004. D3.1.1.b state of the art on ontology evolution. SEKT Deliverable, Institute AIFB, University of Karlsruhe.Google Scholar
Haase, P., van Harmelen, F., Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H., Sure, Y. 2005. A framework for handling inconsistency in changing ontologies. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), Galway, Ireland, 353–367.Google Scholar
Halaschek-Wiener, C., Katz, Y. 2006. Belief base revision for expressive Description Logics. In Proceedings of OWL: Experiences and Directions 2006 (OWLED-06), Athens, GA, USA.Google Scholar
Hansson, S. O. 1991. Belief contraction without recovery. Studia Logica 50(2), 251260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartung, M., Groß, A., Rahm, E. 2012. COnto–Diff: generation of complex evolution mappings for life science ontologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 46(1), 1532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartung, M., Kirsten, T., Rahm, E. 2008. Analyzing the evolution of life science ontologies and mappings. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Data Integration in the Life Sciences (DILS-08), Amos Bairoch, Sarah Cohen Boulakia & Christine Froidevaux (eds). Springer-Verlag, Evry, France, 11–27.Google Scholar
Hartung, M., Terwilliger, J., Rahm, E. 2011. Recent advances in schema and ontology evolution. In Schema Matching and Mapping, Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A. & Rahm, E. (eds). Data-Centric Systems and Applications. Springer, 149190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heflin, J., Hendler, J., Luke, S. 1999. Coping with changing ontologies in a distributed environment. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Management of the 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-99), Orlando, Florida.Google Scholar
Heflin, J., Hendler, J. 2000. Dynamic ontologies on the web. In Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-00), Austin, Texas, 443–449.Google Scholar
Heflin, J., Pan, Z. 2004. A model theoretic semantics for ontology versioning. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-04), Hiroshima, Japan, 62–76.Google Scholar
Huang, Z., Stuckenschmidt, H. 2005. Reasoning with multi-version ontologies: a temporal logic approach. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), Galway, Ireland, 398–412.Google Scholar
Ide, N., Veronis, J. 1998. Introduction to the special issue on word sense disambiguation: the state of the art. Computational Linguistics 24(1), 240.Google Scholar
Javed, M., Abgaz, Y., Pahl, C. 2009. A pattern-based framework of change operators for ontology evolution. In On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems Workshop (OTM-09), Vilamoura, Portugal, 544–553.Google Scholar
Javed, M., Abgaz, Y., Pahl, C. 2011. Graph-based discovery of ontology change patterns. In Proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Knowledge Evolution and Ontology Dynamics (EvoDyn) at ISWC, Bonn, Germany.Google Scholar
Keberle, N., Litvinenko, Y., Gordeyev, Y., Ermolayev, V. 2007. Ontology evolution analysis with OWL-MeT. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), Innsbruck, Austria, 1–12.Google Scholar
Kirsten, T., Hartung, M., Gross, A., Rahm, E. 2009. Efficient management of biomedical ontology versions. In Proceedings of the 2009 On The Move Workshops (OTM-09), Vilamoura, Portugal, 574–583.Google Scholar
Klein, M. 2004. Change Management for Distributed Ontologies. PhD thesis, Vrije University.Google Scholar
Klein, M., Fensel, D. 2001. Ontology versioning on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the International Semantic Web Working Symposium (SWWS-01), California, USA, 75–91.Google Scholar
Klein, M., Fensel, D., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D. 2002. Ontology versioning and change detection on the web. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-02), Siguenza, Spain.Google Scholar
Klein, M., Noy, N. 2003. A component-based framework for ontology evolution. In Proceedings of the IJCAI-03 Workshop on Ontologies and Distributed Systems, Acapulco, Mexico.Google Scholar
Klein, M., Stuckenschmidt, H. 2003. Evolution management for interconnected ontologies. In Proceedings of the Semantic Integration Workshop at the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-03), Florida, USA.Google Scholar
Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D. 2011a. Exelixis: evolving ontology-based data integration system. In ACM International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD-12), Scottsdale, AZ, USA, 1283–1286.Google Scholar
Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D. 2011b. Ontology evolution in data integration: query rewriting to the rescue. In International Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER-11), Brussels, Belgium, 393–401.Google Scholar
Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D. 2012. Ontology evolution: assisting query migration. In International Conference on Conceptual Modelling (ER-12), Florence, Italy, 331–344.Google Scholar
Konev, B., Walther, D., Wolter, F. 2008. The logical difference problem for Description Logic terminologies. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Automated Reasoning (IJCAR-08), Armando, A., Baumgartner, P. & Dowek, G. (eds), LNAI 5195, 259–274. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Konstantinidis, G., Flouris, G., Antoniou, G., Christophides, V. 2008a. A formal approach for RDF/S ontology evolution. In Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI-08), Patras, Greece, 405–409.Google Scholar
Konstantinidis, G., Flouris, G., Antoniou, G., Christophides, V. 2008b. On RDF/S ontology evolution. In Post-Proceedings of the Joint ODBIS & SWDB Workshop on Semantic Web, Ontologies, Databases (SWDB-ODBIS-07), Vienna, Austria, 21–42.Google Scholar
Kontchakov, R., Wolter, F., Zakharyaschev, M. 2008. Can you tell the difference between DL-Lite ontologies? In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-08), Lang, J. & Brewka, G. (eds). AAAI Press/MIT Press, 285–295.Google Scholar
Laera, L., Handschuh, S., Zemanek, J., Volkel, M., Bendaoud, R., Hacene, M., Toussaint, Y., Delecroix, B., Napoli, A. 2008. D2.3.8 v2 Report and Prototype of Dynamics in the Ontology Lifecycle. Technical report.Google Scholar
Lam, S., Sleeman, D., Vasconselos, W. 2005. ReTAX++: a tool for browsing and revising ontologies. In Poster Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), Galway, Ireland.Google Scholar
Lausen, G., Meier, M., Schmidt, M. 2008. SPARQLing constraints for RDF. In Proceedings of 11th International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT-08), Nantes, France, 499–509.Google Scholar
Leenheer, P. D., Mens, T. 2008. Ontology evolution: state of the art and future directions. In Ontology Management for the Semantic Web, Semantic Web Services, and Business Applications, Hepp, M., Leenheer, P. D., de Moor, A. & Sure, Y. (eds). Springer, 131176.Google Scholar
Lee, K., Meyer, T. 2004. A classification of ontology modification. In Proceedings of the 17th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AI-04), 248–258.Google Scholar
Liang, Y., Alani, H., Shadbolt, N. 2006a. Changing ontology breaks queries. In Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-06), Athens, GA, USA, 982–985.Google Scholar
Liang, Y., Alani, H., Shadbolt, N. 2006b. Enabling Active Ontology Change Management Within Semantic Web-Based Applications. Mini-thesis, PhD upgrade report.Google Scholar
Liu, H., Lutz, C., Milicic, M., Wolter, F. 2006. Updating Description Logic ABoxes. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR-06), Lake District, UK.Google Scholar
Li, X., Szpakowicz, S., Matwin, S. 1995. A WordNet-based algorithm for word sense disambiguation. In International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95) 14, Montreal, Canada, 1368–1374.Google Scholar
Lopez, V., Uren, V., Sabou, M., Motta, E. 2009. Cross ontology query answering on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP-09). Redondo Beach, California, USA.Google Scholar
Luczak-Rosch, M. 2009. Towards agile ontology maintenance. In Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-09), vol. 5823, Springer, 965–972.Google Scholar
Luke, S., Spector, L., Rager, D., Hendler, J. 1997. Ontology-based web agents. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Marina del Rey, CA, USA, 59–66.Google Scholar
Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L., Studer, R., Volz, R. 2002. Managing multiple ontologies and ontology evolution in Ontologging. In Proceedings of the Conference on Intelligent Information Processing, World Computer Congress, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
Magiridou, M., Sahtouris, S., Christophides, V., Koubarakis, M. 2005. RUL: a declarative update language for RDF. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), Galway, Ireland, 506–521.Google Scholar
Maynard, D., Funk, A., Peters, W. 2009. SPRAT: a tool for automatic semantic pattern based ontology population. In International Conference for Digital Libraries and the Semantic Web (ICSD-09), Trento, Italy.Google Scholar
Maynard, D., Peters, W., d'Aquin, M., Sabou, M. 2007. Change management for metadata evolution. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), Innsbruck, Austria, 27–40.Google Scholar
Meyer, T., Lee, K., Booth, R. 2005. Knowledge integration for Description Logics. In Proceedings of the 20th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-05), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 645–650.Google Scholar
Moguillansky, M., Rotstein, N., Falappa, M. 2008. A theoretical model to handle ontology debugging and change through argumentation. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-08), Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
Motik, B., Horrocks, I., Sattler, U. 2007. Bridging the gap between OWL and relational databases. In Proceedings of 17th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW-07), Banff, Canada, 807–816.Google Scholar
Novacek, V., Laera, L., Handschuh, S. 2007. Semi-automatic integration of learned ontologies into a collaborative framework. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), Innsbruck, Austria.Google Scholar
Noy, N., Chugh, A., Liu, W., Musen, M. 2006. A framework for ontology evolution in collaborative environments. In Proceedings of the 5th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-06), Athens, GA, USA, 544–558.Google Scholar
Noy, N., Fergerson, R., Musen, M. 2000. The knowledge model of Protégé-2000: combining interoperability and flexibility. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Methods, Models, and Tools (EKAW-00), Sophia Antipolis, France, 17–32.Google Scholar
Noy, N., Klein, M. 2004. Ontology evolution: not the same as schema evolution. Knowledge and Information Systems 6(4), 428440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noy, N., Kunnatur, S., Klein, M., Musen, M. 2004. Tracking changes during ontology evolution. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-04), 259–273.Google Scholar
Noy, N., Musen, M. 2002. PromptDiff: a fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions. In Proceedings of 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-02), Edmonton, Canada.Google Scholar
Noy, N., Musen, M. 2004. Ontology versioning in an ontology management framework. IEEE Intelligent Systems 19(4), 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obst, D., Chan, C. 2005. Towards a framework for ontology evolution. In Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2005. Canadian Conference, Saskatoon, Canada, 2191–2194.Google Scholar
Oliver, D., Shahar, Y., Shortliffe, E., Musen, M. 1999. Representation of change in controlled medical terminologies. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 15(1), 5376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oren, E., Delbru, R., Catasta, M., Cyganiak, R., Stenzhorn, H., Tummarello, G. 2008. Sindice.com: a document-oriented lookup index for open linked data. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies (IJMSO-08) 3(1), 3752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ottens, K., Gleizes, M., Glize, P. 2007. A multi-agent system for building dynamic ontologies. In Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems. ACM, Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Ottens, K., Hernandez, N., Gleizes, M., Aussenac-Gilles, N. 2009. A multi-agent system for dynamic ontologies. Journal of Logic and Computation 19(5), 831858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palma, A., Haase, P., Wang, Y., d'Aquin, M. 2007. D1.3.1: Propagation Models and Strategies. Technical report, NeOn Deliverable D1.3.1.Google Scholar
Palmisano, I., Tamma, V., Iannone, L., Payne, T., Doran, P. 2008. Dynamic change evaluation for ontology evolution in the semantic web. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), vol. 1, Sydney, Australia, 34–40.Google Scholar
Pammer, V., Ghidini, C., Rospocher, M., Serafini, L., Lindstaedt, S. 2010. Automatic support for formative ontology evaluation. In Poster Proceedings of the Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management by the Masses (EKAW-10). Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
Pammer, V., Serafini, L., Lindstaedt, M. 2009. Highlighting assertional effects of ontology editing activities in OWL. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-09), Chantilly, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Papastefanatos, G., Vassiliadis, P., Simitsis, A., Vassiliou, Y. 2009. Policy-regulated management of ETL evolution. Journal of Data Semantics 13, 147177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papastefanatos, G., Vassiliadis, P., Simitsis, A., Vassiliou, Y. 2010. HECATAEUS: regulating schema evolution. In Proceedings of the 26th IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE-10), Long Beach, CA, USA, 1181–1184.Google Scholar
Papavassiliou, V., Flouris, G., Fundulaki, I., Kotzinos, D., Christophides, V. 2009. On detecting high-level changes in RDF/S KBs. In Proceedings of the 8th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-09), Chantilly, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Papavassiliou, V., Flouris, G., Fundulaki, I., Kotzinos, D., Christophides, V. 2013. High-level change detection in RDF(S) KBs. Transactions on Database Systems 38(1), 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasca, M., Harabagiu, S. 2001. The informative role of WordNet in open-domain question answering. In Proceedings of NAACL-01 Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 138–143.Google Scholar
Plessers, P., de Troyer, O. 2005. Ontology change detection using a version log. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05).Google Scholar
Plessers, P., de Troyer, O., Casteleyn, S. 2005. Event-based modeling of evolution for semantic-driven systems. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE-05), Porto, Portugal, 63–76.Google Scholar
Plessers, P., de Troyer, O., Casteleyn, S. 2007. Understanding ontology evolution: A change detection approach. Web Semantics 5(1), 3949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pruski, C., Guelfi, N., Reynaud, C. 2011. Adaptive ontology-based web information retrieval: the target framework. International Journal of Web Portals 3(3), 4158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qin, L., Atluri, V. 2009. Evaluating the validity of data instances against ontology evolution over the semantic web. Information and Software Technology 51(1), 8397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qi, G., Du, J. 2009. Model-based revision operators for terminologies in Description Logics. In Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-09), Pasadena, CA, USA, 891–897.Google Scholar
Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D. 2006a. Knowledge base revision in Description Logics. In Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA-06), Liverpool, UK.Google Scholar
Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D. 2006b. A revision-based approach for handling inconsistency in Description Logics. In Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning (NMR-06), Lake District, UK.Google Scholar
Redmond, T., Smith, M., Drummond, N., Tudorache, T. 2008. Managing change: an ontology version control system. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions (OWLED-08), Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
Ren, Y., Pan, J. 2011. Optimising ontology stream reasoning with truth maintenance system. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM-10), Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, M., Wassermann, R. 2006. First steps towards revising ontologies. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Ontologies and Their Applications (WONTO-06), Ribeirao Preto, Sao Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, M., Wassermann, R. 2007. Base revision in Description Logics—preliminary results. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-07), Innsbruck, Austria, 69–82.Google Scholar
Ribeiro, M., Wassermann, R., Antoniou, G., Flouris, G., Pan, J. 2009. Belief contraction in web-ontology languages. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-09), Short Paper, Chantilly, VA, USA.Google Scholar
Riess, C., Heino, N., Tramp, S., Auer, S. 2010. EvoPat—pattern-based evolution and refactoring of RDF knowledge bases. In Proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-10), Shanghai, China.Google Scholar
Roger, M., Simonet, A., Simonet, M. 2002. Toward updates in Description Logics. In Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Knowledge Representation Meets Databases (KRDB-02), Toulouse, France.Google Scholar
Rogozan, D., Paquette, G. 2005. Managing ontology changes on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI-05), Compiegne, France, 430–433.Google Scholar
Sabou, M., d'Aquin, M., Motta, E. 2008. Exploring the semantic web as background knowledge for ontology matching. Journal on Data Semantics XI, 156190.Google Scholar
Sabou, M., Fernandez, M., Motta, E. 2009. Evaluating semantic relations by exploring ontologies on the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (NLDB-09), Saarbrucken, Germany.Google Scholar
Serfiotis, G., Koffina, I., Christophides, V., Tannen, V. 2005. Containment and minimization of RDF/S query patterns. In Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-05), Galway, Ireland, 607–623.Google Scholar
Shadbolt, N., Hall, W., Berners-Lee, T. 2006. The semantic web revisited. IEEE Intelligent Systems 21(3), 96101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B., Kalyanpur, A., Katz, Y. 2007. Pellet: a practical OWL-DL reasoner. Web Semantics 5(2), 5153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stojanovic, L. 2004. Methods and Tools for Ontology Evolution. PhD thesis, FZI—Research Center for Information Technologies at the University of Karslruhe.Google Scholar
Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, N. 2002. User-driven ontology evolution management. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW-02), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) 2473, 285–300. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Stojanovic, L., Motik, B. 2002. Ontology evolution within ontology editors. In Proceedings of the OntoWeb-SIG3 Workshop, Siguenza, Spain, 53–62.Google Scholar
Stuckenschmidt, H., Klein, M. 2003. Integrity and change in modular ontologies. In Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-03), Acapulco, Mexico.Google Scholar
Studer, R., Benjamins, V. R., Fensel, D. 1998. Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering 25(1–2), 161197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sure, Y., Angele, J., Staab, S. 2003. OntoEdit: multifaceted inferencing for ontology engineering. Journal on Data Semantics 1(1), 128152.Google Scholar
Tamma, V., Bench-Capon, T. 2001. A conceptual model to facilitate knowledge sharing in multi-agent systems. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontologies in Agent Systems (OAS-01), Montreal, Canada, 69–76.Google Scholar
Tao, J., Sirin, E., Bao, J., McGuinness, D. 2010. Extending OWL with integrity constraints. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Workshop on Description Logics (DL-10). CEUR-WS 573, Waterloo, Canada.Google Scholar
Thor, A., Hartung, M., Gross, A., Kirsten, T., Rahm, E. 2009. An evolution based approach for assessing ontology mappings—a case study in the life sciences. In Datenbanksysteme in Business, Technologie und Web (BTW), Munster, Germany, 277–286.Google Scholar
Velardi, P., Fabriani, P., Missikoff, M. 2001. Using text processing techniques to automatically enrich a domain ontology. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Ogunquit, ME, USA, 270–284.Google Scholar
Volkel, M., Winkler, W., Sure, Y., Kruk, S., Synak, M. 2005. SemVersion: a versioning system for RDF and ontologies. In Proceedings of the 2nd European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-05), Heraklion, Greece.Google Scholar
Vrandecic, D., Pinto, H. S., Sure, Y., Tempich, C. 2005. The DILIGENT knowledge processes. Journal of Knowledge Management 9(5), 8596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Liu, X., Ye, R. 2008. Ontology evolution issues in adaptable information management systems. In Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE-08). IEEE Computer Society, Xian, China, 753–758.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Wang, K., Topor, R. 2010. A new approach to knowledge base revision in DL-Lite. In Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-10), Atlanta, Georgia, USA.Google Scholar
Xuan, D., Bellatreche, L., Pierra, G. 2006. A versioning management model for ontology-based data warehouses. In Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 4081. Springer, 195–206.Google Scholar
Zablith, F. 2009. Evolva: a comprehensive approach to ontology evolution. In Proceedings of the PhD Symposium of the 6th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC-09), Heraklion, Greece, 944–948.Google Scholar
Zablith, F., d'Aquin, M., Sabou, M., Motta, E. 2010. Using ontological contexts to assess the relevance of statements in ontology evolution. In Proceedings of Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management by the Masses (EKAW-10), Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Zablith, F., Sabou, M., d'Aquin, M., Motta, E. 2008. Using background knowledge for ontology evolution. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Ontology Dynamics (IWOD-08), Karlsruhe, Germany.Google Scholar
Zeginis, D., Tzitzikas, Y., Christophides, V. 2007. On the foundations of computing deltas between RDF models. In Proceedings of the 6th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC-07), Busan, Korea.Google Scholar
Zeginis, D., Tzitzikas, Y., Christophides, V. 2011. On computing deltas of RDF/S knowledge bases. ACM Transactions on the Web 5(3).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
79
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ontology evolution: a process-centric survey
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Ontology evolution: a process-centric survey
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Ontology evolution: a process-centric survey
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *