Skip to main content Accessibility help

Aggregation in agent-based models of economies

  • Scott E. Page (a1)


Agent-based models are often described as bottom-up because macro-level phenomena emerge from the micro-level interactions of agents. These macro-level phenomena include fixed points, cycles, dynamic patterns, and long transients. In this paper, I explore the link between micro-level characteristics—learning rules, diversity, network structure, and externalities—and the macro-level patterns they produce. I focus on why we need agent-level modeling, on how these models produce emergent phenomenon, and on how agent-based models help understand outcomes of social systems in a way that differs from the analytic, equilibrium approach.



Hide All
Anderson, P. 1972. More is different. Science 177, 393396.
Andreoni, J., Miller, J. H. 1995. Auctions with adaptive artificial agents. Games and Economic Behavior 10(1), 3964.
Arthur, B. 1994. Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. University of Michigan Press.
Arthur, W. B., Holland, J. H., LeBaron, B., Palmer, R. G., Tayler, P. J. 1997. Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In The Economy As An Evolving Complex System II, Arthur, W. B., Durlauf, S. & Lane, D. (eds). Addison-Wesley.
Axelrod, R., Axtell, R., Epstein, J., Cohen, M. D. 1996. Aligning simulation models: a case study and results. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 1, 123141.
Axtell, R. 2001. Zipf distribution of U.S. firm sizes. Science 293(5536), 18181820.
Axtell, R. 2003. A Positive Theory of Emergence for Multi-Agent Systems. Working paper, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics. The Brookings Institution.
Axtell, R., McRae, C.Model Aggregation for Dynamical Systems. Personal communication.
Axtell, R. L. 1999. The Emergence of Firms in a Population of Agents: Local Increasing Returns, Unstable Nash Equilibria, and Power Law Size Distributions. Working paper. Santa Fe Institute.
Bak, P. 1996. How Nature Works: The Science of Self Organized Criticality. Springer Verlag.
Bankes, S. 2002. Agent-based modeling: a revolution? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99, 71997200.
Barabasi, L. 2002. Linked: How Everything is Connected to Everything Else and What it Means. Basic Books.
Bedau, M. A. 1991. Weak emergence. Nos 31(Supplement: Philosophical Perspectives, 11, Mind, Causation, and World), 375–399.
Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kuehnert, C., West, G. B. 2007. Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences 104, 73017306.
de Marchi, S. 2005. Computational and Mathematical Modeling in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.
Epstein, J. 2003. Generative Social Science. Princeton University Press.
Epstein, J., Axtell, R. 1996. Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science form the Bottom Up. MIT Press.
Gode, D. K., Sunder, S. 1993. Allocative efficiency of markets with zero intelligence traders: market as a partial substitute for individual rationality. Journal of Political Economy 101, 119137.
Golman, R., Page, S. 2009. Basins of attraction and equilibrium selection under different learning rules. Evolutionary Economics, 20, 4972.
Glaeser, E., Sacerdote, B., Scheinkman, J. 1996. Crime and social interactions. Quarterly Journal of Economics 111(2), 507548.
Hofbauer, J. 2000. From Nash and Brown to Maynard Smith: equilibria, dynamics and ESS. Selection 1, 8188.
Hong, L., Page, S. 2001. Problem solving by teams of heterogeneous agents. Journal of Economic Theory 97, 123163.
Huberman, B., Glance, N. 1993. Evolutionary games and computer simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 90(16), 77167718.
Howitt, P. 2006. Coordination issues in long-run growth. In Handbook of Computational Economics, II: Agent-Based Computational Economics, Tesfatsion, L. & Judd, K. (eds). North Holland.
Iwasa, Y., Andreasen, V., Levin, S. 1987. Aggregation in model ecosystems. I. Perfect aggregation. Ecological Modeling 37, 287302.
Kirman, A. 1992. Whom or what does the representative individual represent? The Journal of Economic Perspectives 6, 117136.
LeBaron, B. 2001. Stochastic volatility as a simple generator of apparent financial power laws and long memory. Quantitative Finance 1(86), 621631, 929–937.
LeBaron, B. 2006. Agent-based financial markets: matching stylized facts with style. In Post Walrasian Macroeconomics: Beyond the DSGE Model, Colander, D. (ed.). Cambridge University Press, 221235.
Miller, J. H. 1996. The coevolution of automata in the repeated prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 29(1), 87112.
Miller, J. H., Page, S. E. 2007. Complex Adaptive Systems: An Introduction to Computational Models of Social Life. Princeton University Press.
Nirei, M. 2006. Threshold behavior and aggregate fluctuation. Journal of Economic Theory 127, 309322.
Page, S. E. 1997. On incentives and updating in agent based models. Computational Economics 10, 6787.
Page, S. E. 2006. Essay: path dependence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(1), 87115.
Page, S. E. 2007. Type interactions and the rule of six. Economic Theory 30(2), 223241.
Page, S. E. 2008. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies. Princeton University Press.
Reiter, S. 1977. Information, incentives, and performance in the (new)2 economid. American Economic Review 67(1), 226234.
Simon, H. A. 1955. On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika 42(3–4), 425440.
Tesfatsion, L. 1997. How economists can get a-life. In The Economy as a Complex Evolving System II. Arthur, W.B., Durlauf, S. & Lane, D. (eds). Addison Wesley, 533565.
Vriend, N. 2000. An illustration of the essential difference between individual and social learning, and its consequences for computational analyses. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 24, 119.
Wolfram, S. 2001. A New Kind of Science. Wolfram Media.
Young, P. 2001. Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions. Princeton University Press.

Aggregation in agent-based models of economies

  • Scott E. Page (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed