Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 16
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Abushark, Yoosef Miller, Tim Thangarajah, John Winikoff, Michael and Harland, James 2016. Requirements specification via activity diagrams for agent-based systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems,


    Miller, Tim Pedell, Sonja Lopez-Lorca, Antonio A. Mendoza, Antonette Sterling, Leon and Keirnan, Alen 2015. Emotion-led modelling for people-oriented requirements engineering: The case study of emergency systems. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 105, p. 54.


    Ur Rehman, Shafiq and Nadeem, Aamer 2015. An Approach to Model Based Testing of Multiagent Systems. The Scientific World Journal, Vol. 2015, p. 1.


    Yildirim, Suleyman Sayit, Muge and Kardas, Geylani 2015. A belief-desire-intention agent architecture for partner selection in peer-to-peer live video streaming applications. Expert Systems, Vol. 32, Issue. 3, p. 327.


    Dam, Hoa Khanh and Ghose, Aditya 2013. Supporting change impact analysis for intelligent agent systems. Science of Computer Programming, Vol. 78, Issue. 9, p. 1728.


    Dam, Hoa Khanh and Winikoff, Michael 2013. Towards a next-generation AOSE methodology. Science of Computer Programming, Vol. 78, Issue. 6, p. 684.


    Derakhshan, F. Bench-Capon, T. and McBurney, P. 2013. Dynamic assignment of roles, rights and responsibilities in normative multi-agent systems. Journal of Logic and Computation, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 355.


    Lee, Jonathan Lee, Shin-Jie Chen, Hsi-Min and Wu, Chia-Ling 2012. Composing web services enacted by autonomous agents through agent-centric contract net protocol. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 54, Issue. 9, p. 951.


    Miller, Tim Pedell, Sonja Sterling, Leon Vetere, Frank and Howard, Steve 2012. Understanding socially oriented roles and goals through motivational modelling. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 85, Issue. 9, p. 2160.


    Dam, Hoa Khanh and Ghose, Aditya 2011. 2011 27th IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance (ICSM). p. 33.

    Saifan, Ahmad A. Dingel, Juergen Bradbury, Jeremy S. and Posse, Ernesto 2011. 2011 Fourth IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification and Validation. p. 269.

    Soroor, Javad Sajjadi, Sara Sahar Sajjadi, S. Alavi, Seyed Naeim and Soheilinia, Abdolmajid 2011. An advanced adoption model and an algorithm of evaluation agents in automated supplier ranking. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 62, Issue. 10, p. 3649.


    Sterling, Leon 2011. Adaptivity: A Quality Goal for Agent-Oriented Models?. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 38.


    Deckert, Andreas and Klein, Robert 2010. Agentenbasierte Simulation zur Analyse und Lösung betriebswirtschaftlicher Entscheidungsprobleme. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, Vol. 60, Issue. 2, p. 89.


    McKean, Jez Shorter, Hayden Luck, Michael McBurney, Peter and Willmott, Steven 2008. Technology diffusion: analysing the diffusion of agent technologies. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 372.


    McBurney, Peter and Luck, Michael 2007. The Agents Are All Busy Doing Stuff!. IEEE Intelligent Systems, Vol. 22, Issue. 4, p. 6.


    ×

Crossing the agent technology chasm: Lessons, experiences and challenges in commercial applications of agents

  • STEVE MUNROE (a1), TIM MILLER (a2), ROXANA A. BELECHEANU (a3), MICHAL PĚCHOUČEK (a4), PETER MCBURNEY (a2) and MICHAEL LUCK (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0269888906001020
  • Published online: 04 December 2006
Abstract

Agent software technologies are currently still in an early stage of market development, where, arguably, the majority of users adopting the technology are visionaries who have recognized the long-term potential of agent systems. Some current adopters also see short-term net commercial benefits from the technology, and more potential users will need to perceive such benefits if agent technologies are to become widely used. One way to assist potential adopters to assess the costs and benefits of agent technologies is through the sharing of actual deployment histories of these technologies. Working in collaboration with several companies and organizations in Europe and North America, we have studied deployed applications of agent technologies, and we present these case studies in detail in this paper. We also review the lessons learnt, and the key issues arising from the deployments, to guide decision-making in research, in development and in implementation of agent software technologies.

Copyright
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Knowledge Engineering Review
  • ISSN: 0269-8889
  • EISSN: 1469-8005
  • URL: /core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×