Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Representing and classifying arguments on the Semantic Web

  • Iyad Rahwan (a1) (a2), Bita Banihashemi (a3), Chris Reed (a4), Douglas Walton (a5) and Sherief Abdallah (a3) (a6)...
Abstract
Abstract

Until recently, little work has been dedicated to the representation and interchange of informal, semi-structured arguments of the type found in natural language prose and dialogue. To redress this, the research community recently initiated work towards an Argument Interchange Format (AIF). The AIF aims to facilitate the exchange of semi-structured arguments among different argument analysis and argumentation-support tools. In this paper, we present a Description Logic ontology for annotating arguments, based on a new reification of the AIF and founded in Walton's theory of argumentation schemes. We demonstrate how this ontology enables a new kind of automated reasoning over argument structures, which complements classical reasoning about argument acceptability. In particular, Web Ontology Language reasoning enables significantly enhanced querying of arguments through automatic scheme classifications, instance classification, inference of indirect support in chained argument structures, and inference of critical questions. We present the implementation of a pilot Web-based system for authoring and querying argument structures using the proposed ontology.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

K. Atkinson , T. J. M. Bench-Capon , P. McBurney 2006. PARMENIDES: facilitating deliberation in democracies. Artificial Intelligence and Law 14(4), 261275.

P. Baroni , M. Giacomin 2007. On principle-based evaluation of extension-based argumentation semantics. Artificial Intelligence 171(10–15), 675700.

S. Farnham , H. R. Chesley , D. E. McGhee , R. Kawal , J. Landau 2000. Structured Online Interactions: Improving the Decision-Making of Small Discussion Groups. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. ACM Press, 299308.

T. F. Gordon , H. Prakken , D. Walton 2007. The Carneades model of argument and burden of proof. Artificial Intelligence 171(10–15), 875896.

I. Horrocks , P. F. Patel-Schneider , S. Bechhofer , D. Tsarkov 2005. OWL rules: a proposal and prototype implementation. Journal of Web Semantics 3(1), 2340.

J. Katzav , C. Reed 2004. On argumentation schemes and the natural classification of arguments. Argumentation 18(2), 239259.

J. L. Pollock 1987. Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science 11(4), 481518.

H. Prakken , G. Sartor 1997. Argument-based extended logic programming with defeasible priorities. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7(1), 2576.

I. Rahwan 2008. Mass Argumentation and the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics 6(1), 2937.

I. Rahwan , F. Zablith , C. Reed 2007. Laying the foundations for a World Wide Argument Web. Artificial Intelligence 171(10–15), 897921.

C. Reed , D. Walton 2005. Towards a formal and implemented model of argumentation schemes in agent communication. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11(2), 173188.

G. Stumme , A. Hotho , B. Berendt (2006). Semantic Web mining: state of the art and future directions. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 4(2), 124143.

F. H. van Eemeren , R. F. Grootendorst 1992. Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

D. N. Walton 1996. Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Erlbaum.

D. N. Walton 2006. Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge University Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Knowledge Engineering Review
  • ISSN: 0269-8889
  • EISSN: 1469-8005
  • URL: /core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 9 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 110 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.