Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Validation and verification issues in a timeline-based planning system

  • Amedeo Cesta (a1), Alberto Finzi (a2), Simone Fratini (a1), Andrea Orlandini (a3) and Enrico Tronci (a4)...

To foster effective use of artificial intelligence planning and scheduling (P&S) systems in the real world, it is of great importance to both (a) broaden direct access to the technology for the end users and (b) significantly increase their trust in such technology. Automated P&S systems often bring solutions to the users that are neither ‘obvious’ nor immediately acceptable to them. This is because these tools directly reason on causal, temporal, and resource constraints; moreover, they employ resolution processes designed to optimize the solution with respect to non-trivial evaluation functions. Knowledge engineering environments aim at simplifying direct access to the technology for people other than the original system designers, while the integration of validation and verification (V&V) capabilities in such environments may potentially enhance the users’ trust in the technology. Somehow, V&V techniques may represent a complementary technology, with respect to P&S, that contributes to developing richer software environments to synthesize a new generation of robust problem-solving applications. The integration of V&V and P&S techniques in a knowledge engineering environment is the topic of this paper. In particular, it analyzes the use of state-of-the-art V&V technology to support knowledge engineering for a timeline-based planning system called MrSPOCK. The paper presents the application domain for which the automated solver has been developed, introduces the timeline-based planning ideas, and then describes the different possibilities to apply V&V to planning. Hence, it continues by describing the step of adding V&V functionalities around the specialized planner, MrSPOCK. New functionalities have been added to perform both model validation and plan verification. Lastly, a specific section describes the benefits as well as the performance of such functionalities.

Hide All
J. Frank , A. Jonsson 2003. Constraint based attribute and interval planning. Journal of Constraints 8(4), 339364.

K. L. McMillan 1993. Symbolic Model Checking. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers, ISBN 0792393805.

C. Pecheur , R. G. Simmons 2001. From livingstone to SMV. In FAABS-00. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Formal Approaches to Agent-Based Systems—Revised Papers, 103113, London, UK: Springer-Verlag. ISBN 3-540-42716-3.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

The Knowledge Engineering Review
  • ISSN: 0269-8889
  • EISSN: 1469-8005
  • URL: /core/journals/knowledge-engineering-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 4 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 119 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.