Hostname: page-component-699b5d5946-jpxmw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-27T19:54:16.739Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2Review Article

Review products

Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis. Ed. by Peter Bellwood and Renfrew Colin. Cambridge: McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research, 2002. Pp. xiv, 505. ISBN 1902937201. $85 (Hb).

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Malcolm Ross*
Affiliation:
The Australian National University
*
Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Building No. 9, The Australian National University, Canberra A.C.T. 0200, [Malcolm.Ross@anu.edu.au]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alpher, Barry. 2004. Pama-Nyungan: Phonological reconstruction and status as a phylogenetic group. Australian languages: Classification and the comparative method, ed. by Bowern, Claire and Koch, Harold, 93126. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellwood, Peter. 1997. Prehistoric cultural explanations for widespread language families. In McConvell & Evans, 123–34.Google Scholar
Bellwood, Peter. 2001. Early agricultural population diasporas? Farming, languages and genes. Annual Review of Anthropology 30. 181207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blench, Roger M. 1997. Crabs, turtles and frogs: Linguistic keys to early African subsistence systems. Archaeology and language 1: Theoretical and methodological orientations, ed. by Blench, Roger M. and Spriggs, Matthew, 166–83. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blust, Robert A. 1996. Beyond the Austronesian homeland: The Austric hypothesis and its implications for archaeology. Prehistoric settlement of the Pacific (Transactions of the Americal Philosophical Society 86.5), ed. by Goodenough, Ward H., 117–40. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1997. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehret, Christopher. 1993. Nilo-Saharans and the Saharo-Sudanese Neolithic. The archaeology of Africa: Food, metals and towns, ed. by Shaw, Thurstan, Sinclair, Paul, Andah, Bassey W., and Okpoko, Alex, 104–25. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas, and Jones, Rhys. 1997. The cradle of the Pama-Nyungans: Archaeological and linguistic speculations. In McConvell & Evans, 385417.Google Scholar
Fortson, Benjamin W. IV, . 2004. Indo-European language and culture: An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Golla, Victor. 2000. Language families of North America. America past, America present: Genes and languages in the Americas and beyond, ed. by Renfrew, Colin, 5972. Cambridge: The McDonald Institute of Archaeological Research.Google Scholar
Hill, Jane H. 2001. Language on the land: Towards an anthropological dialectology. Archaeology, language, and history: Essays on culture and ethnicity, ed. by Terrell, John E., 257–82. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D., and Joseph, Brian D. 2003. On language, change, and language change—or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. The handbook of historical linguistics, ed. by Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., 3180. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
McConvell, Patrick, and Evans, Nicholas (eds.) 1997. Archaeology and linguistics: Aboriginal Australia in global perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nettle, Daniel. 1999. Linguistic diversity. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nichols, Johanna. 1992. Linguistic diversity in space and time. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichols, Johanna. 1997. Modeling ancient population structures and movement in linguistics. Annual Review of Anthropology 26. 359–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, Andrew. 2005. The chequered career of the Trans New Guinea hypothesis: Recent research and its implications. Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, ed. by Pawley, Andrew, Attenborough, Robert, Hide, Robin, and Golson, Jack, 67107. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Reid, Lawrence A. 1999. New linguistic evidence for the Austric hypothesis. Selected papers from the Eighth International Conference on Austronesian Linguistics (Symposium series of the Institute of Linguistics (preparatory office), Academia Sinica 1), ed. by Zeitoun, Elizabeth and Li, Paul Jen-kuei, 530. Taipei: Academia Sinica.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1987. Archaeology and language: The puzzle of Indo-European origins. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1991. Before Babel: Speculations on the origins of linguistic diversity. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 1. 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 1992. World languages and human dispersals: A minimalist view. Transition to modernity, ed. by Hall, John A. and Jarvie, Ian C., 1168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renfrew, Colin. 2000. At the edge of knowability: Towards a prehistory of languages. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 10. 734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, Malcolm. 2005. Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, ed. by Pawley, Andrew, Attenborough, Robert, Hide, Robin, and Golson, Jack, 1565. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent. 2005. Sino-Tibetan–Austronesian. The peopling of east Asia: Putting together archaeology, linguistics and genetics, ed. by Sagart, Laurent, Blench, Roger, and Sanchez-Mazas, Alicia, 161–76. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Wilhelm. 1906. Die Mon-Khmer-Völker: Ein Bindeglied zwischen Völkern Zeantralasiens und Austronesiens. Archiv für Anthropologie 5. 59109.Google Scholar