Hostname: page-component-5f7774ffb-9crdt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-20T06:19:38.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dependencies Between Grammatical Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald  and
R. M. W. Dixon
Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald
Affiliation:
Australian National University
R. M. W. Dixon
Affiliation:
Australian National University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In some languages there are dependencies between grammatical systems, e.g. there may be fewer tense choices in negative than in positive polarity. We examine the direction of dependencies between eight types of grammatical systems, and establish a dependency hierarchy. Polarity is at the top of the hierarchy—the choices available in another system may depend on polarity, but the possibility of positive/negative specification never depends on any of the other systems considered here. Next come systems associated with the predicate (or perhaps with the clause as a whole): tense, aspect, and evidentiality. Next come systems associated with predicate arguments—person, reference classification (covering gender/noun class, classifiers, and human/nonhuman or animate/inanimate); then number. And finally case, which marks the function of a predicate argument. The rationale for this hierarchy is considered. An appendix adds systems of definiteness to the discussion.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 74 , Issue 1 , March 1998 , pp. 56 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1994. Classifiers in Tariana. Anthropological Linguistics 36. 407–65.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1997a. A grammar of Tariana. Canberra: Australian National University, ms.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1997b. Classifiers: A typology of noun-classification devices. Canberra: Australian National University, ms.Google Scholar
Alpher, Barry. 1987. Feminine as the unmarked gender: Buffalo girls are no fools. Australian Journal of Linguistics 7. 169–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameka, Felix. 1991. Ewe: Its grammatical constructions and illocutionary devices. Canberra: Australian National University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar
Aronoff, Mark. 1992. Noun classes in Arapesh. Yearbook of Morphology 1991:21-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austin, Peter. 1981. Case marking in southern Pilbara languages. Australian Journal of Linguistics 1. 211–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakaev, Ch. H. 1966. Kurdskij jazyk [Kurdish language]. Jazyki narodov SSSR: Indoeuro- pejskie Jazyki [Languages of the peoples of the USSR: Indo-European languages], ed. by Vinogradov, V. V., 257–80. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Barnes, Janet. 1984. Evidentials in the Tuyuca verb, International Journal of American Linguistics 50. 255–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barz, Richard K., and Diller, Anthony V. N. 1989. Classifiers and standardisation: Some south and south-east Asian comparisons. Papers in South-East Asian Linguistics 9: Language policy, language planning and sociolinguistics in south-east Asia, ed. by Bradley, David, 155–84. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Basu, Dwijendranath. 1955. On the negative auxiliary in Bengali. Indian Linguistics 15. 9–13.Google Scholar
Berlin, Brent. 1968. Tzeltal numeral classifiers: A study in ethnographic semantics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1979. Pitta-pitta. Handbook of Australian languages, ed. by Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J., 1. 183–242. Canberra: ANU Press, and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Borgman, Donald M. 1990. Sanuma. Handbook of Amazonian languages, ed. by Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K., 2. 15–248. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Breeze, Mary J. 1990. A sketch of the phonology and grammar of Gimira (Benchnon). Omotic language studies, ed. by Hayward, Richard J., 1–67. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Brown, D. Richard. 1994. Kresh. Typological studies in negation, ed. by Kahrel, Peter and van den Berg, René, 163–89. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Burling, Robbins. 1965. How to use a Burmese numeral classifier. Context and meaning in cultural anthropology, ed. by Spiro, M., 243–65. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere; and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Peter J. 1976. Kunwinjku: A language of western Arnhem Land. Canberra: Australian National University MA thesis.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1967. Seneca morphology and dictionary. Washington: Smithsonian Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, and Nichols, Johanna (eds.) 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chapman, Shirley, and Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1991. Paumarí. Handbook of Amazonian languages, ed. by Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey K., 3. 161–352. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Charney, Jan Ormsbee. 1993. A grammar of Comanche. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Chung, Sandra, and Timberlake, Alan. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. Language typology and syntactic description, ed. by Shopen, Timothy, 3. 202–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collinder, Björn. 1965. An introduction to the Uralic languages. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. Ergativity and grammatical relations in Kalaw Lagaw Ya (Saibai dialect). Australian Journal of Linguistics 1. 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Greville. 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universais. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Östen. 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1977. A grammar of Yidiji. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1981. Warrgamay. Handbook of Australian languages, ed. by Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J., 2. 1–143. Canberra: ANU Press, and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1995. Fusional development of gender marking in Jarawara possessed nouns. International Journal of American Linguistics 61. 263–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1997a. The rise and fall of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1997b. Basic linguistic theory. Canberra: Australian National University, ms.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W., and Vogel, Alan R. 1997. The Jarawara language of southern Amazonia. Canberra: Australian National University, ms.Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang. 1968. Studien zur verbalen Pluralität. Vienna: Hermann Böhlaus.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas D. 1995. A grammar of Kayardild. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feoktistov, A. P. 1966. Mordovskije jazyki [Mordvin languages]. Yazyki narodov SSSR, Tom. III: Finno-Ugorskije i Samodijskije jazyki [Languages of the peoples of the USSR, vol. III: Finno-Urgric and Samoyed languages], 172–220. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Feoktistov, A. P. 1975. Mordovskije jazyki [Mordvin languages]. Osnovy Finno-ugorskogo jazykoz-nanija: Pribaltijsko-finskije, Saamskij and Mordovskije jazyki [Foundations of Finno- Ugric linguistics: Balto-Finnic, Saarni and Mordvin languages], 248–345. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1986. The Papuan languages of New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A. 1991. The Yimas language of New Guinea. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Foley, William A., and Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., 1984. Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ford, Kevin, and Ober, Dana. 1991. A sketch of Kalaw Kawaw Ya. Language in Australia, ed. by Romaine, Suzanne, 118–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Frajzyngier, Zygmunt. 1989. A grammar of Pero. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer.Google Scholar
Friedman, Victor A. 1986. Evidentiality in the Balkans: Bulgarian, Macedonian and Albanian. In Chafe & Nichols, 168–87.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lynn. 1986. The development of evidential in Maricopa. In Chafe & Nichols, 75–88.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universais of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universais of language, ed. by Greenberg, Joseph H., 73–113. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Language universais. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1991. The Semitic ‘intensive’ as verbal plurality: A study of grammaticalization. Semitic studies in honor of Wolf Leslau, ed. by Kaye, Alan S., 577–87. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Gurubasave Gowda, K. S. 1975. Ao grammar. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude. 1982. La structure des langues. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Hayward, Richard J. 1990. Notes on the Aari language. Omotic language studies, ed. by Hayward, Richard J., 425–93. London: School of Oriental and African Studies.Google Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1978. Ngandi grammar, texts and dictionary. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Heine, Bernd. 1982. African noun class systems. Apprehension: Das sprachliche Erfassen von Gegenständen, Teil I, Bereich und Ordnung der Phänomene, ed. by Seiler, Hansjakob and Lehmann, Christian, 189–216. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1971. Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb. Selected writings, vol. 2: Word and language, 130–43. The Hague: Mouton. [Reprinted in Jakobson 1984: 41-58.]Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman. 1984. Russian and Slavic grammar: Studies 1931-1981, ed. by Waugh, Linda R. and Halle, Morris. Berlin: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, Sandra. 1983. Yukulta. Handbook of Australian languages, ed. by Dixon, R. M. W. and Blake, Barry J., 3. 190–304. Canberra: ANU Press, and Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kirtchuk, Pablo. 1993. /?et/ ou ne pas /?et/: l’actance Y en hébreu et au-delà. Actances 7.91- 137.Google Scholar
Kumakhov, Mukhadin, and Vamling, Karina. 1995. On root and subordinate clause structure in Kabardian. Lund University Department of Linguistics Working Papers 44.91- 110.Google Scholar
Laanest, Arvo. 1975. Sissejuhatus Läänemeresoome keeltesse [Introduction to Balto-Finnic languages]. Tallinn: Eesti NSV Teaduste Akadeemia [Estonian Academy of Sciences]. An abridged translation published as: Pribaltijsko-finskije jazyki. Osnovy Finno-Ugorskogo jazykoznanija; Pribaltijsko-finskije, Saamskij and Mordovskije jazyki [Foundations of Finno-Ugric linguistics; Balto-Finnic, Saami and Mordvin languages], 5-121. 1975. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Landin, David J. 1984. An outline of the syntactic structure of Kantiana sentences. Estudos sobre línguas tupí do Brasil (Série Lingüística, No 11), 219–54. Brasília: SIL.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Thomas. 1993. A grammar of Modern Tamil. Pondicherry: Pondicherry Institute of Linguistics and Culture.Google Scholar
Leslau, Wolf. 1995. Reference grammar of Amharic. Wiesbaden: Hanassowitz.Google Scholar
Lyons, John. 1966. Towards a ‘notional’ theory of the ‘parts of speech’. Journal of Linguistics 2. 209–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahapatra, B. P. 1979. Malto: An ethnosemantic study. Mysore: Central Institute of Indian Languages.Google Scholar
Mallinson, Graham, and Blake, Barry J. 1981. Language typology: Cross-cultural studies in syntax. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Matzel, Klaus. 1987. Einführung in die singalesische Sprache. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
O’Grady, Geoffrey N., Voegelin, C. F.; and Voegelin, F. M. 1966. Languages of the world: Indo-Pacific Fascicle 6 (= Anthropological Linguistics 8, ii).Google Scholar
Palmer, F. R. 1986. Mood and modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plank, Franz (ed.) 1991. Paradigms: The economy of inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Franz, and Schellinger, Wolfgang. 1997. The uneven distribution of genders over numbers: Greenberg nos. 37 and 45. Linguistic Typology 1. 53–101.Google Scholar
Plungian, Vladimir. 1995. Dogon (Languages of the world/materials 64). Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, and Wrenn, C. L. 1957. An Old English grammar, 2nd ed. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Rice, Keren. 1989. A grammar of Slave. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, John R. 1987. Amele (Croom Helm descriptive grammars). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Roth, Walter E. 1897. Ethnological studies among the north-west-central Queensland Aborigines. Brisbane: Government Printer.Google Scholar
Saltarelli, Mario. 1988. Basque (Croom Helm descriptive grammars). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sands, Kristina. 1995. Nominal classification in Australia. Anthropological Linguistics 37. 247–346.Google Scholar
Scatton, Ernest A. 1984. A reference grammar of Modem Bulgarian. Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Skorik, P. Ja. 1961. Grammatika čukotskogo jazyka. Tom. 1 [Grammar of the Chukchi language, vol. 1]. Moscow and Leningrad: Izdatel’stvo akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Steinhauer, Hein. 1986. Number in Biak: Counterevidence to two alleged language universais (a summary). FOCAL I: Papers from the fourth international conference on Austronesian linguistics, ed. by Geraghty, Paul, Carrington, Lois, and Wurm, S. A., 171–3. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Tamura, Suzuko. 1988. Ainugo [The Ainu language]. Gengogaku Daijiten [Encyclopedia of Linguistics] 1. 6–94. Tokyo: Senseido.Google Scholar
Tepljashina, T. I., and Lytkin, V. I. 1976. Permskije jazyki [Permic languages]. Osnovy Finno-Ugorskogo jazykoznanija; Marijskij, Permskije i Ugorskije jazyki [Foundations of Finno-Ugric linguistics: Mari, Permic and Ugric languages], 97–228. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Tiersma, P. M. 1982. Local and general markedness. Language 58. 832–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timberlake, Alan. 1986. Hierarchies in the genitive of negation. Case in Slavic, ed. by Brecht, R. D. and Levine, J. S., 338–60. Columbus, OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Trask, R. L. 1993. A dictionary of grammatical terms in linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. 1962. Principles of phonology, trans, by Christiane A. M. Baltaxe, 3rd edn. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press. [Originally published in German, as Grundzüge der Phonologie, 1939.]Google Scholar
Van Valin, Robert D. jr., 1993. A synopsis of role and reference grammar. Advances in role and reference grammar, ed. by Van Valin, Robert D. Jr., , 1–164. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Watkins, Laurel. 1984. A grammar of Kiowa. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Weber, David J. 1986. Information perspective, profile, and pattern in Quechua. In Chafe & Nichols, 137–55.Google Scholar
Weber, David J. 1989. A grammar of Huallaga (Huánuco) Quechua. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Kay. 1963. A grammar of the Kolokuma dialect of Ịjọ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Peter J. 1992. Una descripción preliminar de la gramática del Achagua (Arawak). Bogota: Instituto Lingüístico de Verano (SIL).Google Scholar