Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T05:17:51.165Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Etymological Miscellany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

George S. Lane*
Affiliation:
Catholic University of America

Extract

Etymologies heretofore proposed for Grk. ταχύ𝗌 ‘swift’, τάχo𝗌 ‘swiftness’, have met little favor. The notion of ‘swiftness’ is frequently a by-product of ‘tension’: e.g., cf. ON snarr literally ‘tightly twisted’ of a string (: snara ‘turn, twist, wring'), but chiefly ‘swift'; and more especially Lat. contendo frequently ‘hasten', or NE speed, OE spēd, OHG spuot ‘speed, success’, ChSl. spěšiti ‘hasten’, all probably from the root ∗spē(i)- in Grk. σπéω ‘draw’. With this in mind one is tempted to derive Grk. ταχύ𝗌 < ∗thgh- from the root in Av. θang-‘pull, draw’, θanvan-, θanvar- ‘bow’, ChSl. tęgnąti ‘draw’, etc. According to Osthoff the comparative σσωv, ττωv represents éωv with the gradation to be noted in Skt. bahú- ‘much’ and the comparative bánhīya- ‘very stout’, hence the root must be ∗thangh-/∗thṇgh-. In this case all the Slavic forms in tęg- (ChSl. tęgnąti, etc.) represent the weak grade of the root and Slavic ∗tog- in Russ. tugój ‘tight, solid, stretched (of the bow)', Pol. lęgi ‘hard, solid, strong', etc., represents a Pre-Slavic ∗tang-, The representation of IE th by Grk. though often denied seems clear in several other cases.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1935 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable