Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6wbsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-26T13:06:17.826Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generative Tests for Generative Meter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Gilbert Youmans
Gilbert Youmans*
Affiliation:
University of Missouri, Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Valid tests for metrical theories can be constructed by removing the effect of ‘poetic’ syntactic transformations and observing the metrical consequences: e.g. Thy edge should blunter be is converted to Thy edge should be blunter (a metrical violation). Applying this approach to the over 500 inversions in Hamlet and the Sonnets provides considerable support for the metrical theories developed by Halle–Keyser and Kiparsky, with K faring slightly better. However, inversions affecting words like divine and enough suggest that minor revisions may be needed in K's rules. As each such revision becomes necessary, the likelihood increases that the set of permissible iambic pentameter lines is ‘fuzzy’ rather than well-defined.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 59 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 67 - 92
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barnes, Mervin, and Esau, Helmut. 1978. English prosody reconsidered. Language and Style 11.212–22.Google Scholar
Beaver, Joseph C. 1971. The rules of stress in English verse. Lg. 47.586–614.Google Scholar
Beaver, Joseph C. 1974. Generative metrics: The present outlook. Poetics 12: Generative metrics, ed. by Beaver, J. C. & Ihwe, Jens F., 7–28. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Beaver, Joseph C. 1976. The prosody of John Donne. Chicago: Dept. of Linguistics, Northeastern Illinois University.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Gascoigne, George. 1575. Certain notes of instruction. [Reprinted in English reprints 10–12, ed. by Edward Arber, 31–40. London, 1868.]Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Keyser, S. J. 1966. Chaucer and the study of prosody. College English 28.187–219. [Reprinted in Linguistics and literary style, ed. by Donald Freeman, 366–426. New York: Holt, 1968.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keyser, S. J. 1971. English stress: Its form, its growth, and its role in verse. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1975. Stress, syntax, and meter. Lg. 51.576–615.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1977. The rhythmic structure of English verse. LI 8.189–247.Google Scholar
Koelb, Clayton. 1979. The iambic pentameter revisited. Neophilologus 63.321–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, Mark. 1975. The intonational system of English. MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Liberman, Mark, and Prince, Alan. 1977. On stress and linguistic rhythm. LI 8.249–336.Google Scholar
Magnuson, Karl, and Ryder, Frank. 1970. The study of English prosody: An alternative proposal. College English 31.789–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puttenham, George. 1585. The arte of English poesie. [Reprint, ed. by Gladys Doidge Willcock & Alice Walker. Cambridge: University Press, 1970.]Google Scholar
Schane, Sanford. 1979. The rhythmic nature of English word accentuation. Lg. 55.559–602.Google Scholar
Sidney, Sir Philip. 1585. The defence of poesie. [Reprinted in his Prose works, ed. by Albert Feuillerat, vol. 3. Cambridge: University Press, 1962.]Google Scholar
Youmans, Gilbert. 1974. Test case for a metrical theory: ‘La Belle Dame sans Merci’. Language and Style 7.283–305.Google Scholar
Youmans, Gilbert. 1981. Hamlet's testimony on Kiparsky's theory of meter. To appear in Neophilologus.Google Scholar