Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-9kl9f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-14T16:58:33.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Information Structuring in Papago Narrative Discourse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Doris E. Payne
Doris E. Payne*
Affiliation:
Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Oregon
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In previous accounts, the word order of Papago (Uto-Aztecan, Arizona) has been described—in terms of syntactic roles—as SOV, SVO, and VSO. However, discourse data show that (surface) order is most insightfully accounted for by strong pragmatic principles. Information preceding the verb is either pragmatically marked, or is information for which the hearer is instructed to ‘open a new active discourse file’. Other information follows the verb. Syntactic role correlates highly with the discourse-pragmatic and semantic status of the information encoded, but has almost no correlation with order. Therefore, in terms of the typological tradition represented by J. Greenberg, J. Hawkins, and others, no particular order of syntactic roles should be taken as basic. Rather, languages in which order is not based on syntactic role should simply not be forced into an order typology based on syntactic role.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 63 , Issue 4 , December 1987 , pp. 783 - 804
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

I would like to thank Ethelene Rosero and Dean Saxton, who have generously helped me learn something about Pima and Papago. In addition, William Bright, Wallace Chafe, Scott DeLancey, John Du Bois, Kenneth Hale, Talmy Givón, Pamela Munro, Tom Payne, and Sandra Thompson have given helpful comments on a previous version of this paper. Much appreciation goes to Nonie Holtz for consultation on the statistical analyses.

References

Anderton, Alice. 1976. Pima locationals and related matters. UCLA, ms.Google Scholar
Bahr, Donald M., et al. 1974. Piman shamanism and staying sickness (Ká:cim múmkidag). Tucson: University of Arizona Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentivoglio, Paola. 1983. Topic continuity and discontinuity in discourse: A study of spoken Latin-American Spanish. In Givón 1983:255–311.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J. 1983. Structure and word order in Kalkatungu: The anatomy of a flat language. Australian Journal of Linguistics 3.143–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Robert. 1984. Narrative connectives in Supiré. Coherence and grounding in discourse, ed. by Tomlin, Russell. To appear, Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. Subject and topic, ed. by Li, Charles, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1980. The deployment of consciousness in the production of a narrative. The pear stories, ed. by Chafe, W., 9–50. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace. 1984. Cognitive constraints on information flow. Coherence and grounding in discourse, ed. by Tomlin, Russell. To appear, Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Chapín, Paul. 1978. Easter Island: A characteristic VSO language. Syntactic typology, ed. by Lehmann, Winfred P., 139–68. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Christopherson, P. 1939. The articles: A study of their theory and use in English. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1978. Ergativity. Syntactic typology, ed. by Lehmann, Winfred P., 329–94. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon. 1980. Studies in functional grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dik, Simon, et al. 1981. On the typology of focus phenomena. Perspectives on functional grammar, ed. by Hoekstra, Teun et al., 41–74. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, Robert M. W. 1979. Ergativity. Lg. 55.59–138.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1980. Beyond definiteness: The trace of identity in discourse. The pear stories, ed. by Chafe, W., 203–74. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Du Bois, John W. 1985. Competing motivations. Iconicity in syntax, ed. by Haiman, John, 343–65. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Firbas, Jan. 1964. On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague 1.267–80.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1983 (ed.) Topic continuity in discourse: A quantitative cross-language study. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1984. The pragmatics of referentiality. Meaning, form, and use in context (Georgetown University Round Table 84), ed. by Shiffrin, Deborah, 120–38. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1985. The pragmatics of word order: Predictability, importance and attention. Language typology and language universals, ed. by Moravcsik, Edith. To appear, Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Joseph. 1966. Some universals of grammar, with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. Universals of language, ed. by Greenberg, J., 2nd edn., 73–113. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1975. Papago intonation and word order. Paper presented at the 1975 Uto-Aztecan Conference.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth. 1983. Papago (k)c. IJAL 49.299–327.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1979. Implicational universals as predictors of word order change. Lg. 55.618–48.Google Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1980. On implicational and distributional universals of word order. Journal of Linguistics 16.193–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, John. 1983. Word order universals. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hope, Edward. 1973. Non-syntactic constraints on Lisu noun phrase order. Foundations of Language 10.79–109.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1977. Studies in Uto-Aztecan grammar, 1: An overview of Uto-Aztecan grammar. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Li, Charles, and Thompson, Sandra. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallinson, Graham, and Blake, Barry. 1981. Language typology. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
McCawley, James. 1970. English as a VSO language. Lg. 46.286–99.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1984. Is basic word order universal? Paper presented at the Symposium on Discourse Relations and Cognitive Units, Eugene, Oregon.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1982. On the transitivity of ‘say’ verbs. Studies in transitivity, ed. by Hopper, Paul and Thompson, Sandra (Syntax and semantics, 15), 301–18. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Munro, Pamela. 1984. Floating quantifiers in Pima. The syntax of Native American languages, ed. by Cook, Eung-Do and Gertz, Donna (Syntax and semantics, 16), 269–87. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Payne, Doris L. 1985. Aspects of the grammar of Yagua: A typological perspective. UCLA dissertation.Google Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1982. Role and reference related subject properties and ergativity in Yup'ik Eskimo and Tagalog. Studies in Language 6.75–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, Thomas E. 1984. Split-S and fluid-S marking revisited. Papers from the Parasession on Lexical Semantics, ed. by Richardson, John et al., 173–84. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Saxton, Dean. 1980. Evidence for basic word order in Papago-Pima. ms.Google Scholar
Saxton, Dean. 1982. Papago. Studies in Uto-Aztecan grammar, 3, ed. by Langacker, Ronald, 93–266. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Saxton, Dean, and Saxton, Lucille. 1969. Papago and Pima to English dictionary. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Saxton, Dean. 1973. O'othham hoho'ak a'agitha: Legends and lore of the Papago and Pima Indians. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Scancarelli, Janine. 1985. Referential stategies in Chamorro narratives: Preferred clause structure and ergativity. Studies in Language 9.335–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1976. The subject in Philippine languages: Topic, actor, actor-topic, or none of the above. Subject and topic, ed. by Li, Charles, 491–518. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Schachter, Paul. 1984. Semantic-role-based syntax in Toba Batak. Studies in the structure of Toba Batak, ed. by Schachter, Paul (UCLA occasional papers in linguistics, 5), 122–49. Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Schuh, Russell G. 1977. Bade/Ngizim determiner system. Afroasiatic Linguistics 4.101–74.Google Scholar
Shaul, David. 1986. Topics in Nevome syntax. (University of California publications in linguistics, 109.) Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. Grammatical categories in Australian languages, ed. by Dixon, Robert M. W., 112–71. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Stucky, Susan. 1981. Word order variation in Makua: A phrase structure grammar analysis. Urbana: University of Illinois dissertation.Google Scholar
Sun, C.-F., and Givón, Talmy. 1985. On the so-called SOV word order in Mandarin Chinese. Lg. 61.329–51.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra. 1978. Modern English from a typological point of view: Some implications of the function of word order. Linguistische Berichte 54.19–35.Google Scholar