Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T06:02:50.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Language and Non-Linguistic Patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2026

M. B. Emeneau*
Affiliation:
University of California

Extract

An essential part of Bloomfield's definition of linguistic forms and constructions is the attachment to them of stimulus-reaction features, which are his definition of meaning. The linguistic scholar is still bedeviled by the many problems involved in talking about meaning, and he still lacks a body of dogma to which he can refer when meaning is talked about. This paper is an attempt to explore one of the problems and to establish a postulate which may be added to Bloomfield's Set of Postulates.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1950 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable