Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T12:38:21.203Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Measuring Events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Guido Vanden Wyngaerd*
Affiliation:
Catholic University, Brussels
*
Fonds voor Wetenschappelijk, Onderzoek-Vlaanderen, Katholieke Universiteit Brussel, Vrijheidslaan 17, B-1081 Brussels, Belgium [guido.vandenwyngaerd@kubrussel.ac.be]

Abstract

The telic-atelic distinction has been argued to hinge on the presence of a (bounded) internal argument measuring out the event, or, alternatively, a resultative small clause providing an end point for the event. Both perspectives are partially correct and partially incorrect. On the one hand, the resultative is more adequately seen as a measure than an end point; on the other, it is the resultative predicate rather than the internal argument that performs this measuring function. Empirical evidence is adduced in support of this point of view: resultative predicates are subject to the requirement that they denote a bounded scale. Only bounded predicates can delimit an event by providing it with minimal parts. As a matter of conceptual necessity, unbounded predicates, though potentially denoting end points, cannot function as event measures.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable