Hostname: page-component-68c7f8b79f-gx2m9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-01-02T08:43:27.609Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brief response to Müller

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Benjamin Bruening
Benjamin Bruening*
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
*
[bruening@udel.edu]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Replies
Information
Language , Volume 94 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. e67 - e73
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adger, David. 2013. A syntax of substance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2010. Language-particular syntactic rules and constraints: English locative inversion and do-support. Language 86(1). 43–84. DOI: 10.1353/lan.0.0201.10.1353/lan.0.0201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Precede-and-command revisited. Language 90(2). 342-88. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2014.0037.10.1353/lan.2014.0037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2017a. Consolidated morphology: A non-distributed, purely syntactic theory of morphology. Newark: University of Delaware, ms. Online: http://udel.edu/~bruening/Downloads/ConsMorphosyntax1.pdf.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2017b. Word formation is syntactic: Raising in nominalizations. Newark: University of Delaware, ms. Online: http://udel.edu/~bruening/Downloads/RaisingNominal2.pdf.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2018. The lexicalist hypothesis: Both wrong and superfluous. Language 94(1). 1–42.10.1353/lan.2018.0000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Kuthy, Kordula, and Meurers, W. Detmar. 2001. On partial constituent fronting in German. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3(3). 143–205. DOI: 10.1023/A:1011926510300.10.1023/A:1011926510300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria, and Williams, Edwin. 1987. On the definition of word. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry A., Bever, Thomas G.; and Garrett, Merrill F.. 1974. The psychology of language: An introduction to psycholinguistics and generative grammar. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline, and Zamparelli, Roberto. 2005. Friends and colleagues: Plurality, coordination, and the structure of DP. Natural Language Semantics 13(3). 201-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11050-004-2442-z.10.1007/s11050-004-2442-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray S. 1997. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 1998. Incomplete category fronting: A derivational approach to remnant movement in German. (Studies in natural language and linguistic theory 42.) Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-017-1864-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Gereon. 2014. Syntactic buffers: A local-derivational approach to improper movement, remnant movement, and resumptive movement. Leipzig: Institut für Linguistik, Universität Leipzig.Google Scholar
Müller, Stefan. 2018. The end of lexicalism as we know it? Language 94(1). e54–e66.10.1353/lan.2018.0014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Colin. 1996. Order and structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/10666.Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin, and Lewis, Shevaun. 2013. Derivational order in syntax: Evidence and architectural consequences. Studies in Linguistics 6. 11–47.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3). 365–424. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178634.Google Scholar
Reuland, Eric. 2011. What's nominal in nominalizations? Lingua 121(7). 1283-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2011.01.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sag, Ivan A., Baldwin, Timothy, Bond, Francis, Copestake, Ann; and Flickinger, Dan. 2002. Multiword expressions: A pain in the neck for NLP. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing: Third international conference, CICLing 2002 (Lecture notes in computer science 2276), 1–15.Google Scholar
Wiese, Richard. 1996. Phrasal compounds and the theory of word syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 27(1). 183-93. Online: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4178931.Google Scholar
Williams, Alexander. 2015. Arguments in syntax and semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar