Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-q7pjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-15T12:25:08.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparative Structures in Italian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Donna Jo Napoli
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Marina Nespor
Affiliation:
University of Amsterdam

Abstract

Comparatives of inequality in Italian are introduced by di or che, have a degree or an absolute negative interpretation, and have a modifying or a balancing function. Comparative di phrases are PP's generated as daughters of VP's or of AP's with a degree interpretation; like other PP's, they can modify or balance two items. Comparative che is a coördinator. When it introduces daughters of VP's or AP's, it has a degree interpretation; when it introduces a sister to S, it has an absolute negative interpretation. Because of the coördinating nature of che, it has only a balancing function.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 62 , Issue 3 , September 1986 , pp. 622 - 653
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

We thank Mauro Scorretti for useful discussions at an initial stage of this research, and Frank Casa, Anna Ferruzzi, Enzo Lo Cascio, and Claudio Mazzola for helping us as native speakers. We are also indebted to the University of Michigan for the Rackham Grant to Augment International Academic Partnerships; without this financial help, the paper would not exist. A final thanks goes to Geoff Pullum for comments on an earlier draft.

References

Bolinger, Dwight. 1950. The comparison of inequality in Spanish. Lg. 26. 2862.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight. 1953. Addenda to the comparison of inequality in Spanish. Lg. 29. 62–6.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert. 1984. Coördination reduction in complex words: A case for prosodic phonology. Advances in non-linear phonology, ed. by van, Harry Hulst, der & Smith, Norval, 143–60. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bracco, Claudio. 1980. On the island character of Italian ‘quanto’ comparatives. Journal of Italian Linguistics 5:1/2.19–46.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1973. Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. LI 4. 275343.Google Scholar
Dieterich, Thomas, and Napoli, Donna Jo. 1982. Comparative ‘rather’. JL 18. 137–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax: Root, structure-preserving and local transformations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gazdar, Gerald. 1981. Unbounded dependencies and coördinate structure. LI 12. 155–84.Google Scholar
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Why there are two than's in English. CLS 9. 179–91.Google Scholar
Hellan, Lars. 1981. Toward an integrated analysis of comparatives. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio, and Lepschy, Anna Laura. 1977. The Italian language today. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan M. 1972. On ‘Gapping and the order of constituents’. LI 3. 101–8.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1983. Comparative ellipsis: A phrase structure analysis. LI 14. 675–94.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina. 1984. The phonological word in Italian. Advances in non-linear phonology, ed. by van, Harry Hulst, der & Smith, Norval, 193204. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Pinkham, Jessie. 1982. The formation of comparative clauses in French and English. Bloomington: IULC.Google Scholar
Regula, Moritz, and Jernej, Josip. 1965. Grammatica italiana descrittiva. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Thompson, Sandra A. 1972. Instead of and rather than clauses in English. JL 8. 237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1982. Another argument that passive is transformational. LI 13. 160–63.Google Scholar