Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-20T16:12:06.435Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competence Differences Between Native and Near-Native Speakers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

René Coppieters
René Coppieters*
Affiliation:
Pomona College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Do native and native-like non-native (i.e. near-native) speakers develop essentially identical underlying grammars of the same language? Results of extensive interviews indicate that native and near-native speakers of French have strikingly different intuitions on French sentences. In particular, the two groups have markedly divergent interpretations of sentences involving basic grammatical contrasts such as the two past tenses (imparfait and passé composé), the 3rd person pronouns il and ce, and the placement of the adjective before or after the noun. This is so in spite of the fact that the two groups appear to be equivalent at the level of language use and proficiency. These results provide a clear illustration of the relative independence of the two levels of language: on the one hand, language use, and on the other hand, underlying grammar as reflected by speakers' intuitions. It is suggested that the specific nature of the divergences between native and near-native speakers' underlying grammars also provides clues to the internal organization of language: in particular, the data indicate that near-native speakers diverge less from native speakers in formal features, such as those currently covered by studies in Universal Grammar, than in ‘functional’ or ‘cognitive’ aspects of grammar.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 63 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 544 - 573
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

ACTFL. 1986. Proficiency guidelines. Hastings-on-Hudson: American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages.Google Scholar
Adjemian, Christian. 1982. La spécificité de l'interlangage et l'idéalisation des langues secondes. Grammaire générative: Théorie et méthodologie, ed. by Guéron, Jacqueline & Sowley, Thelma, 421–39. Paris: Centre de Recherches, Université Paris VIII.Google Scholar
Anderson, John R. 1982. Acquisition of cognitive skills. Psychological Review 89.369–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John R. 1983. The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Sharon L., Gleitman, Lila R.; and Gleitman, Henry. 1983. What some concepts might not be. Cognition 13.263–308.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, Nathalie, Madden, Carolyn; and Krashen, Stephen D. 1974. Is there a ‘natural sequence’ in adult second language learning? Language Learning 21.235–43.Google Scholar
Bates, Elizabeth, et al. 1982. Functional constraints on sentence processing: A cross-linguistic study. Cognition 11.245–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystock, Helen. 1982. On the relationship between knowing and using linguistic forms. Applied Linguistics 3.181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burston, Jack L., and Monville-Burston, Monique. 1981. The use of demonstrative and personal pronouns as anaphoric subjects of the verb être. Lingvisticae Investigationes 5.231–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, John M., Bever, Thomas G.; and Pollack, Chava R. 1981. The non-uniqueness of linguistic intuitions. Lg. 57.368–82.Google Scholar
Chaudron, Craig. 1983. Research on metalinguistic judgements: A review of theory, methods, and results. Language Learning 33.343–77.Google Scholar
Cheng, Patricia. 1985. Restructuring versus automaticity: Alternative accounts of skill acquisition. Psychological Review 92.414–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Essays on form and interpretation. New York: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Coppieters, René. 1975. The opposition between il and ce and the place of the adjective in French. Harvard Studies in Syntax and Semantics 1.221–80.Google Scholar
Coppieters, René. 1983. Descriptions and attitudes: The problem of reference to individuals. Studies in Language 6.1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corder, S. Pit. 1981. Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
D'Anglejean, Alison, and Masny, Diana. 1985. Language, cognition, and second language grammaticality judgements. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 14.175–97.Google Scholar
Dulay, Heidi, and Burt, Marina. 1974. Natural sequence in child second language acquisition. Language Learning 24.37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dulay, Heidi; and Krashen, Stephen D. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, Robert. 1984. Classroom second language development. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Færch, Claus, and Kasper, Gabrielle 1983 (eds.) Strategies in interlanguage communication. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Felix, Sasha W. 1981. The effect of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Language Learning 31.87–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, Susan. 1982. The development of L2 intuitions. TESOL Quarterly 17.273–91.Google Scholar
Gass, Susan, and Selinker, Larry. 1983 (eds.) Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1979. On understanding grammar. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1982. Tense-aspect-modality: The creole prototype and beyond. Tense-aspect: Between semantics and pragmatics, ed. by Hopper, Paul, 115–63. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Gross, Maurice. 1968. Grammaire transformationnelle du français: Syntaxe du verbe. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Guiraud, Pierre. 1962. La syntaxe du français contemporain. Paris: P.U.F.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1982a. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, John. 1982b (ed.) Language and social identity. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Higgs, Theodore. 1985. The input hypothesis: An inside look. Foreign Language Annals 18.197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, Georgette. 1984. Is there a structural foreign accent? A comparison of syntactic and phonological errors in second language acquisition. Language Learning 34.1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. 1986. From meta-processes to conscious access: Evidence from children's metalinguistic and repair data. Cognition 23.95–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kayne, Richard. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen D. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Krashen, Stephen D. 1985. The Input Hypothesis. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1972. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. LI 3.269–320.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1969. Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Lg. 45.715–62.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lado, Robert. 1957. Linguistics across cultures. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 1986. An introduction to cognitive grammar. Cognitive Science 10.1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLaughlin, Barry, Rossman, Tamni; and McLeod, Beverly. 1983. Second language learning: An information processing perspective. Language Learning 33.135–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McWhinney, Brian, Bates, Elizabeth; and Kliegh, Reinhold. 1984. Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German and Italian. JVLVB 23.127–50.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen. 1983. Strategies of second language acquisition: More than one kind of simplification. Pidginization and creolization as second language acquisition, ed. by Anderson, Roger, 120–57. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Meisel, Jürgen; and Pieneman, M. 1981. On determining developmental stages in natural second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 3.109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, Carol. 1984. On input and residual L1 transfer effects in Turkish and Greek children's German. Second language: A cross-linguistic perspective, ed. by Andersen, Roger, 271–98. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1983. Sur quelques propriétés des phrases copulatives en français. Français et grammaire universelle, ed. by Obenauer, Hans G. & Pollock, Jean-Yves, 89–125. Paris: Larousse.Google Scholar
Reiner, Erwin. 1968. La place de l'adjectif épithète en français: Théories traditionelles et essai de solution. Wien: Braumüller.Google Scholar
Richards, Jack, and Sukwiwat, Mayuri. 1983. Language transfer and conversational competence. Applied Linguistics 4.113–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivers, Wilga. 1983. Communicating naturally in a second language. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1980. Specifying reference to the subject: French causative and conditions on representations. LI 11.97–202.Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1972. Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1982. Grammaire des insultes et autres études. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Schumann, John. 1978. The pidginization process. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Stigler, James W. 1984. ‘Mental abacus’: The effect of abacus training on Chinese children's mental calculation. Cognitive Psychology 16.145–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strick, Gregory. 1980. A hypothesis for semantic development in a second language. Language Learning 30.155–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tahta, Sonia, Wood, Margaret; and Loewenthal, Kate. 1981. Foreign accents: Factors relating to transfer of accent from the first language to a second language. Language and Speech 24.265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, Elaine. 1985. Variability in interlanguage use: A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax. Language Learning 35.373–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varonis, Elizabeth, and Gass, Susan. 1985. Miscommunication in native/non-native conversation. Language in Society 14.327–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waugh, Linda. 1977. A semantic analysis of word order. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zobl, Helmut. 1982. A direction for contrastive analysis: The comparative study of developmental sequences. TESOL Quarterly 16.169–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar