Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-9kl9f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-14T14:11:23.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Contact in Causation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Anuradha Saksena
Anuradha Saksena*
Affiliation:
Los Angeles, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The distinction between contactive and non-contactive causation shows up repeatedly in languages (Masica 1976, Chap. 3; Cole 1976), and is claimed by Xolodovič 1969 to be ‘fundamental’ in their description. Arguing against earlier descriptions, this paper provides an alternate analysis of this important contrast.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , December 1982 , pp. 820 - 831
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Balachandran, Lakshmi Bai. 1973. A case grammar of Hindi. (Decennary publication series, 7.) Agra: Central Institute of Hindi.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1976. The grammatical role of the causee in universal grammar. University of Illinois, Urbana, MS.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Review of Xolodovič 1969. Lg. 52.479–88.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 1966. An introduction to Hindi syntax. Urbana: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Kachru, Yamuna. 1971. Causative sentences in Hindi revisited. Papers on Hindi syntax, ed. by Kachru, Y. (Studies in linguistic sciences, 1:2), 75–103. Urbana: Dept. of Linguistics, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Kellogg, S. H. 1938. A grammar of the Hindi language. 3rd ed. [Reprinted, New Delhi: Oriental Books Reprint Corp., 1972.]Google Scholar
Masica, Colin. 1976. Defining a linguistic area. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pray, Bruce R. 1970. Topics in Hindi-Urdu grammar. (Research monographs, 1.) Berkeley: Center for South and Southeast Asian Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
Saksena, Anuradha. 1980. The affected agent. Lg. 56.812–26.Google Scholar
Saksena, Anuradha. 1982. Topics in the analysis of causatives, with an account of Hindi paradigms. To appear in UCPL.Google Scholar
Sharma, Aryendra. 1972. A basic grammar of Modern Hindi. Delhi: Ministry of Education and Scientific Research, Government of India.Google Scholar
Shibatani, Masayoshi. 1975. A linguistic study of causative constructions. Berkeley: University of California dissertation. [Reproduced by the Indiana University Linguistics Club.]Google Scholar
Xolodovič, A. A. 1969 (ed.) Tipologija kauzativnyx konstrukcij: Morfologičeskij kauzativ. Leningrad: Nauka.Google Scholar
Zide, Arlene R. K. 1972. Transitive and causative in Gorum. JL 8.201–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar