Hostname: page-component-5f7774ffb-cnfpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-20T03:57:39.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ergativity

Review products

Ergativity. By Dixon R.M.W.. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 69.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. Pp. xxii, 271.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Alice C. Harris
Alice C. Harris*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
*
Program in Linguistics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 [harrisac@ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Review Article
Information
Language , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , June 1997 , pp. 359 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alekseev, M. E. 1994. Rutul. The indigenous languages of the Caucasus, 4: North East Caucasian Languages, Part 2, ed. by Smeets, Rieks, 213–58. Delmar, NY: Caravan Press.Google Scholar
Bergsland, K. 1955. A grammar of the Eskimo language of West Greenland. Oslo: University of Oslo dissertation.Google Scholar
Boeder, Winfred. 1979. Ergative syntax and morphology in language change: The South Caucasian languages. In Plank 1979b, 435–80.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Kim. 1973. Case shift and verb concord in Georgian. Austin: University of Texas dissertation.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold. 1948. Ergat'iuli k'onst‘rukciis p'roblema iberiul-k'avk‘asiur enebši, 1. [The problem of the ergative construction in the Ibero-Caucasian languages, 1.] Tbilisi: Ak'ademia.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold. 1961. Ergat'iuli k'onst‘rukciis p'roblema iberiul-k'avk‘asiur enebši, 2. [The problem of the ergative construction in the Ibero-Caucasian languages, 2.] Tbilisi: Ak'ademia.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold, Axvlediani, G., Gigineišvili, Iv., Grišašvili, I., Egnat'ašvili, V., Vačnaʒe, Sim., Topuria, V., Kecxoveli, N., K'up'raʒe, Vikt'., Leoniʒe, G., Lomtatiʒe, Ketevan, Lomouri, Tamar, Mentešašvili, S.; and C'ereteli, G. (eds.) 1953. Kartuli enis ganmart'ebiti leksik'oni, t'omi 3. [Explanatory dictionary of the Georgian language, vol. 3.] Tbilisi: Ak'ademia.Google Scholar
Čikobava, Arnold, and Cercvaʒe, Ilia. 1962. Xunʒuri ena. [The Avar language.] Tbilisi: Universit'et'i.Google Scholar
Craig, Colette. 1976. Properties of basic and derived subjects in Jacaltec. In Li 1976, 99–123.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1981. The languages of the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dench, Alan. 1982. The development of an accusative case marking pattern in the Ngayarda languages of Western Australia. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2. 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 1972. The Dyirbal language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.) 1976. Grammatical categories in Australian languages. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (ed.). 1981. Grammatical reanalysis: An example of linguistic change from Warrgamay (North Queensland). Australian Journal of Linguistics 1. 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, John. 1987a. The discourse source of ergativity. Language 63. 815–55.Google Scholar
DuBois, John. 1987b. Absolutive zero: Paradigm adaptivity in Sacapultec Maya. Lingua 71. 203–22. (Special issue, Studies in ergativity, ed. by R. M. W. Dixon.)Google Scholar
Ebeling, Carl L. 1966. The grammar of literary Avar (Review article). Studia Caucasica 2. 58–100.Google Scholar
England, Nora C. 1991. Changes in basic word order in Mayan languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 57. 446–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Faarlund, Jan Terje. 1990. Syntactic change: Toward a theory of historical syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadžiev, M. M. 1954. Sintaksis lezginskogo jazyka, 1: Prostoe predloženie. Maxa: Dagučpedgiz.Google Scholar
Garrett, Andrew. 1990. The origin of NP split ergativity. Language 66. 261–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gildea, Gildea Spike Lawrence. 1992. Comparative Cariban morphosyntax: On the genesis of ergativity in independent clauses. Eugene: University of Oregon dissertation.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Li 1976, 149–88.Google Scholar
Givón, Talmy. 1977. The drift from VSO to SVO in Biblical Hebrew: The pragmatics of tense-aspect. Mechanisms of syntactic change, ed. by Li, Charles N., 181–254. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 1982. Georgian and the unaccusative hypothesis, Language 58. 290–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 1985. Diachronic syntax: The Kartvelian case. (Syntax and Semantics, 18.) New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, Alice C, and Campbell, Lyle. 1995. Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin. 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, Jeffrey. 1974. Some related transformations in Basque. Chicago Linguistic Society 10. 248–58.Google Scholar
Holisky, Dee Ann. 1981. Aspect and Georgian medial verbs. Delmar, NY: Caravan Press.Google Scholar
Holisky, Dee Ann. 1991. Laz. The indigenous languages of the Caucasus, 1: The Kartvelian languages, ed. by Harris, Alice C., 395–472. Delmar, NY: Caravan Press.Google Scholar
Jeiranišvili, Evg. 1983. C'axuri da muxaduri (rutuluri) enebi, 2: morpologia. [The C'axur and Rutul languages, 2: Morphology.] Tbilisi: Universit'et'i.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward L. 1976. Towards a universal definition of ‘subject’. In Li 1976, 303–33.Google Scholar
Kleinschmidt, S. P. [1851] 1968. Grammatik der grönländischen Sprache mit theilweisem Einschluss des Labradordialects. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Klokeid, Terry J. 1978. Nominal inflection in Pamanyungan: A case study in relational grammar. Valence, semantic case, and grammatical relations, ed. by Abraham, Werner, 577–615. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. (ed.) 1976. Subject and topic. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N., and Thompson, Sandra A. 1976. Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In Li 1976, 457–89.Google Scholar
Mejlanova, U. A. 1960. Morfologičeskaja i sintaksičeskaja xarakteristika padežej lezginskogo jazyka. Maxa: Institut Jazyka, Literatury i Narodnogo Tvorčestva.Google Scholar
Mithun, Marianne. 1991. Active/agentive case marking and its motivations. Language 67. 510–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozaʒe, L. 1974. Medioakt'iv zmnata c'armoebis zogi sak'itxi kartulši. [Some questions of the formation of medioactive verbs in Georgian.] Iberiul-k'avk'asiuri enatmecniereba 19. 25–51.Google Scholar
Payne, John R. 1980. The decay of ergativity in Pamir languages. Lingua 51. 147–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, Frans. 1979a. Ergativity, syntactic typology and universal grammar: Some past and present viewpoints. In Plank 1979b, 3–36.Google Scholar
Plank, Frans. (ed.) 1979b. Ergativity: Towards a theory of grammatical relations. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Šaniʒe, Ak'ak'i. 1973. Kartuli enis gramat'ik'is sapu3vlebi. [Fundamentals of the grammar of the Georgian language.] Tbilisi: Universit'et'i.Google Scholar
Sapir, Edward. 1917. Review of Het passieve karakter van het verbum transitivum of van het verbum actionis in talen van Noord-Amerika, by Uhlenbeck, C. C. International Journal of American Linguistics 1. 82–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schebeck, Bernhard. 1976. Thangu and Atjnjamathanha. In Dixon 1976, 516–50.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1979. How Kaluli children learn what to say, what to do, and how to feel. New York: Columbia University dissertation.Google Scholar
Schieffelin, Bambi B. 1985. The acquisition of Kaluli. The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition, vol. 1: The data, ed. by Slobin, Dan I., 525–593. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schiefner, A. 1863. Versuch über die Sprache der Uden. (Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg, VII Série, Tome VI, No. 8.) St. Petersburg: Academy of Science.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Hierarchy of features and ergativity. In Dixon 1976, 112–71.Google Scholar
Xanmagomedov, B. G.-K. 1970. Očerki po sintaksisu tabasaranskogo jazyka. Maxa: Dagestanskoe Učebno-pedagogičeskoe Izdatel'stvo.Google Scholar