Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-23T07:31:40.085Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ethnicity in Phonological Variation and Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Martha Laferriere
Martha Laferriere*
Affiliation:
Southeastern Massachusetts University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the Boston dialect, the variable or as in short, forty, has two phonetic variants: dialectal [Də], and more standard [Oə]. Speakers of three ethnic groups—Irish, Italian, and Jewish—showed systematic differences in stylistic and diachronic use of the variants, and in subjective evaluation of them. The observed differences are consistent with a three-stage model of variation and change based on ethnicity and, secondarily, on education. However, an additional factor of ‘cultural force’ is required to explain why the model may operate at different rates. The model has implications for the acquisition of dialectal vs. standard variants, and lends support to the view that the ‘family’ provides a stronger influence than the ‘peer group’ in the development of phonological systems.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 55 , Issue 3 , September 1979 , pp. 603 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © 1979 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bailey, Charles-James N. 1973. Variation and linguistic theory. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fisher, John L. 1958. Social influences in the choice of a linguistic variant. Word 14. 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Isaac. 1929. A Boston boyhood. American Mercury, Vol. 17, No. 67. [Reprinted in The many voices of Boston, ed. by Howard M. Jones & Bessie Z. Jones, 345–55. Boston: Little, Brown, 1975.]Google Scholar
Haas, Mary. 1944. Men's and women's speech in Koasati. Lg. 20. 142–9.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1962. Phonology in generative grammar. Word 18. 54–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1963. The social motivation of a sound change. Word 19. 273–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 1966. The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, William. 1972. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Thernstrom, Stephan. 1973. The other Bostonians: poverty and progress in the American metropolis, 1880–1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trudgill, Peter J. 1974. The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walter A. 1969. A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar