Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-d2fvj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-24T00:23:39.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Floating quantity in Shilluk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Bert Remijsen  and
Otto Gwado Ayoker
Bert Remijsen*
Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh
Otto Gwado Ayoker*
Affiliation:
Shilluk Language Council
*
[b.remijsen@ed.ac.uk]
[ottoayoker@gmail.com]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is well known that floating tones can associate both within a word and across a word boundary. In relation to floating quantity, however, there is extensive evidence for association within a word, but not across a word boundary. This research report presents evidence for the latter configuration in Shilluk, a West Nilotic language. Shilluk noun forms may end in floating quantity, and this quantity is realized only on following vocalic prefixes, that is, across a word boundary. The investigation includes a descriptive analysis of the phenomenon and a production study based on data from ten Shilluk speakers.

Keywords

floating quantitymoraphonological weightcompensatory lengtheningfusional morphologyprosody

Information

Type
Research Report
Information
Language , Volume 96 , Issue 3 , September 2020 , pp. e135 - e156
Copyright
Copyright © 2020 Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

We thank the speakers who took part in this study: Thon Deng Alibek, Teresa Akic Awanh, Roda Oman Ajubek, Rita Marson Ocway, Ogaac Bol Acyen, Nyayath Kulang Deng, Marko Ayik Arop, Maria Bocay Onak, Daniel Abodhok Apokwach. We are also grateful to SIL South Sudan for sponsoring research visits to South Sudan. Special thanks go to Larry Hyman, who offered many insightful comments in the final stages of the investigation. Earlier versions of this paper were presented as keynote talks at the Annual Meeting on Phonology (University of California, San Diego, 5–7 October 2018) and the 50th Annual Conference on African Linguistics (University of British Columbia, 22–25 May 2019). We gratefully acknowledge the Leverhulme Trust, which supported this research financially through the research grant ‘A descriptive analysis of the Shilluk language’ (RPG-2015-055).

References

Andersen, Torben. 1990. Vowel length in Western Nilotic languages. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 22. 5–26. DOI: 10.1080/03740463.1990.10411520.10.1080/03740463.1990.10411520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, Torben. 1991. Subject and topic in Dinka. Studies in Language 15. 265–94. DOI: 10.1075/sl.15.2.02and.Google Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2018. In defence of underlying representations: Latin rhotacism, French liaison, Romanian palatalization. Probus 30. 171–214. DOI: 10.1515/probus-2017-0006.10.1515/probus-2017-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickmore, Lee, and Broadwell, George Aaron. 1998. High tone docking in Sierra Juárez Zapotec. International Journal of American Linguistics 64. 37–67. DOI: 10.1086/466346.10.1086/466346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimmendaal, Gerrit J. 2000. Number marking and noun categorization in Nilo-Saharan languages. Anthropological Linguistics 42. 214–61. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/30028548.Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. 2010. Basic linguistic theory, vol. 2: Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gilley, Leoma. 1992. An autosegmental approach to Shilluk phonology. (Publications in linguistics 103.) Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and The University of Texas at Arlington.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT dissertation.Google Scholar
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 253–306. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178626.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 1985. A theory of phonological weight. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110854794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2010. Kuki-Thaadow: An African tone system in Southeast Asia. Essais de typologie et de linguistique générale, ed. by Floricic, Franck, 31–51. Lyon: Les Presses de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure.Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2011a. Does Gokana really have no syllables? Or: What's so great about being universal? Phonology 28. 55–85. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675711000030.10.1017/S0952675711000030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2011b. Tone: Is it different? The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn., ed. by Goldsmith, John A., Riggle, Jason, and Yu, Alan C. L., 197–239. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781444343069.ch7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. 2018. What tone teaches us about language. Language 94. 698–709. DOI: 10.1353/lan.2018.0040.10.1353/lan.2018.0040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, Larry M., and Byarushengo, Ernest R.. 1984. A model of Haya tonology. Autosegmental studies in Bantu tone, ed. by Clements, G. N. and Goldsmith, John, 53–104. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110864465.53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKendry, Inga. 2013. Tonal association, prominence and prosodic structure in Southeastern Nochixtlán Mixtec. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh dissertation.Google Scholar
Mutonyi, Nasiombe. 2000. Aspects of Bukusu morphology and phonology. Columbus: The Ohio State University dissertation.Google Scholar
Paster, Mary. 2003. Floating tones in Gã. Studies in African Linguistics 32. 17–39. Online: https://journals.linguisticsociety.org/elanguage/sal/article/view/1366.html.10.32473/sal.v32i1.107345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Tatiana. 2019. The phonology and morphology of the Nuer verb. Surrey: University of Surrey dissertation.Google Scholar
Remijsen, Bert, and Ayoker, Otto Gwado. 2018. Forms and functions of the base paradigm of Shilluk transitive verbs. A grammar of Shilluk (LD&C special publication 14), Ch. 1. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24777.Google Scholar
Remijsen, Bert, and Ayoker, Otto Gwado. 2019. Inflectional morphology and number marking in Shilluk nouns. A grammar of Shilluk (LD&C special publication 14), Ch. 2. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10125/24778.Google Scholar
Remijsen, Bert, and Ayoker, Otto Gwado. 2020. Shilluk_2016_controlled_Floating Quantity. Edinburgh DataShare. Online: http://hdl.handle.net/10283/3578.Google Scholar
Remijsen, Bert, Ayoker, Otto Gwado; and Jørgensen, Signe. 2019. Ternary vowel length in Shilluk. Phonology 36. 91–125. DOI: 10.1017/S0952675719000058.10.1017/S0952675719000058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remijsen, Bert, Miller-Naudé;, Cynthia L. and Gilley, Leoma G.. 2015. Stem-internal and affixal morphology in Shilluk. The Oxford handbook of inflection, ed. by Baerman, Matthew, 577–96. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Trommer, Jochen. 2014. Moraic prefixes and suffixes in Anywa. Lingua 140. 1–34. DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2013.11.003.10.1016/j.lingua.2013.11.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, Jesse L. 2003. Edge features and French liaison. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar (HPSG 2002), 313–33. Online: http://web.stanford.edu/group/cslipublications/cslipublications/HPSG/3/tseng.pdf.10.21248/hpsg.2002.16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Heuvel, Wilco. 2006. Biak: Description of an Austronesian language of Papua. (LOT publication 138.) Utrecht: LOT. Online: https://www.lotpublications.nl/Documents/138_fulltext.pdf.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin S. 1976. Underlying tone in Margi and Igbo. Linguistic Inquiry 7. 463–84. Online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4177935.Google Scholar
Xu, Tongling. 2017. Number marking in Shilluk. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh honors thesis.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Eva. 2017. Morphological length and prosodically defective morphemes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198747321.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Remijsen and Ayoker supplementary material

Remijsen and Ayoker supplementary material
Download Remijsen and Ayoker supplementary material(File)
File 13.1 MB