Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-q7pjp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-24T16:44:18.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Germanic Third Weak Class

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Jay H. Jasanoff*
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Abstract

Germanic verbs of the 3rd weak class form presents characterized by an alternation between predesinential ∗ai (e.g. Go. 3sg. habaiþ) and ∗a (e.g. 1pl. habam). These verbs are usually compared with the ‘ē-verbs’ of Italic and Balto-Slavic, but no IE present built on the stative suffix ∗-ē- will account phonologically for the form of the suffix in Germanic. Instead, it can be shown that the characteristic Germanic paradigm results from the ‘activization’ of an older middle paradigm in which a 3sg. in ∗-ai (< IE ∗-oi; cf. Skt. duhé ‘milks‘) was further suffixed by the productive active ending ∗-þi (< IE ∗-ti).

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bennett, William H. 1962. The parent suffix in Germanic weak verbs of class III. Lg. 38.135141.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Émile. 1966. Actif et moyen dans le verbe. Problèmes de linguistique générale, 168175. Paris.Google Scholar
Chantraine, Pierre. 1925. Les verbes grecs en thō. Mélanges linguistiques offerts à M. Joseph Vendryes par ses amis et ses élèves, 93108. Paris.Google Scholar
Cowgill, Warren. 1959. The inflection of the Germanic ō-presents. Lg. 35.115.Google Scholar
Cowgill, Warren. 1968. The first person singular medio-passive in Indo-Iranian. Pratidānam: Indian, Iranian, and Indo-European studies presented to F. B. J. Kuiper, ed. by Heesterman, J. C. et al., 2431. The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flasdieck, Hermann. 1935. Untersuchungen über die germanischen schwachen Verben III. Klasse. Anglia 59.1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassman, Hermann. 1873. Wörterbuch zum Rigveda. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, Jay. 1968. Studies in the historical morphology of the Hittite verb. Harvard dissertation.Google Scholar
Krahe, Hans. 1961. Altgermanische Kleinigkeiten. IF 66.3543.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang. 1968. Handbuch des Gotischen. Munich.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang., and Jankuhn, Herbert. 1966. Die Runeninschriften im älteren Futhark. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Krause, Wolfgang., and Jankuhn, Herbert., and Thomas, Werner. 1960. Tocharisches Elementarbuch I. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1956. L'apophonie en indo-européen. Wroclaw.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1960. Esquisses linguistiques. Wroclaw.Google Scholar
Kuryłowicz, Jerzy. 1964. The inflectional categories of Indo-European. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, Manfred. 1953. Kurzgefasstes etymologisches Wörterbuch des Altindischen. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Meid, Wolfgang. 1967. Germanische Sprachwissenschaft, III: Wortbildungslehre. Berlin.Google Scholar
Meid, Wolfgang. 1971. Das germanische Präteritum. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Noreen, Adolf. 1923. Altnordische Grammatik, II. Halle.Google Scholar
Polomé, Edgar. 1967. On the origin of the Germanic class III of weak verbs. Beiträge zur Indogermanistik und Keltologie: Julius Pokorny zum 80. Geburtstag, ed. by Meid, Wolfgang, 8392. Innsbruck.Google Scholar
Prévot, Andre. 1935. L'aoriste grec en -then. Paris.Google Scholar
Schmid, Wolfgang P. 1963. Studien zum baltischen und slavischen Verbum. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Wagner, Heinrich. 1950. Zur Herkunft der ē-Verba in den indo-germanischen Sprachen. Zurich.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1969. Indogermanische Grammatik, III.1: Geschichte der indogermanischen Verbalflexion. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Watkins, Calvert. 1972. The Indo-European denominative statives in ∗-ē-. To appear in TPS.Google Scholar