Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-ck798 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-15T07:41:35.993Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indefiniteness and anaphoricity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Peter Cole*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois

Abstract

Grammarians working within the framework of semantically-based grammar have argued that syntactic representations are not arbitrary, but rather have their basis in semantics. In this paper it is further proposed that syntactic processes (rules and constraints) may have a semantic basis. Evidence is presented that the constraint against backward pronominalization with indefinite antecedents, which is found in a wide variety of languages, derives from the semantic properties of various classes of definite noun phrases.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 50 , Issue 4 , December 1974 , pp. 665 - 674
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Chomsky, Carol. 1969. The acquisition of syntax in children from 5 to 10. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cole, Peter. 1973. Indefiniteness and anaphoricity: the analogical extension of a semantically based constraint. University of Illinois dissertation.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1972. Functional sentence perspective. Linguistic Inquiry 3. 269320.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1968. Pronouns and reference. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1972. The arbitrary basis of transformational grammar. Lg. 48. 7687.Google Scholar
Postal, Paul M. 1970. On preferential complement subject deletion. Linguistic Inquiry 1. 439500.Google Scholar