Hostname: page-component-5f7774ffb-l8mnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-02-19T17:53:21.347Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is an icon iconic?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2026

Michael Shapiro
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

To the memory of my wife the metaphysician

The word ICON (< L icon, < Gk ∊iκώv ‘likeness, image, portrait, similitude, semblance‘) has entered the parlance of linguists and philosophers as a technical term, not to speak of anthropologists and other students of culture, especially those who have some cognizance of the theory of signs (semiotics) and of its modern founder, Charles Sanders Peirce (1839–1914). In Peirce's sign theory an icon is a member of his most well-known trichotomy of icon/index/symbol, by which he meant to designate the mutable relations between a SIGN and its OBJECT. Peirce's earliest published mention of this trichotomy is from 1885 (EP 1:225).

Information

Type
Discussion Note
Information
Language , Volume 84 , Issue 4 , December 2008 , pp. 815 - 819
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Alter, Stephen G. 2005. William Dwight Whitney and the science of language. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language. 2000. 4th edn. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
The Century Dictionary and Cyclopedia. 1906. Ed. by William Dwight Whitney. Vol. 4. New York: Century.Google Scholar
Gay, Malcolm. 2008. Firehouse dispute raises racial tension in St. Louis. New York Times, national edition, 5 January. A7.Google Scholar
Haley, Michael Cabot. 1988. The semeiosis of poetic metaphor. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hardwick, Charles S. (ed.) 1977. Semiotic and significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Janda, Richard D., and Joseph, Brian D.. 2003. On language, change, and language change—or, of history, linguistics, and historical linguistics. The handbook of historical linguistics, ed. by Joseph, Brian D. and Janda, Richard D., 3–180. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morris, Charles W. 1938. Foundations of the theory of signs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ogden, Charles K., and Richards, I. A.. 1923. The meaning of meaning: A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism. London: Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online. 2008. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1885. On the algebra of logic: A contribution to the philosophy of notation. American Journal of Mathematics 7.180–202.10.2307/2369451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. Collected papers [CP]. Vols. 1–6: Ed. by Hartshorne, Charles and Weiss, Paul, 1931–35. Vols. 7–8: Ed. by Burks, Arthur W., 1958. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. 1982–2000. Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition, vols. 1–6. Ed. by the Peirce Edition Project. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders. The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings [EP]. Vol. 1: Ed. by Houser, Nathan and Kloesel, Christian J. W., 1992. Vol. 2: Ed. by the Peirce Edition Project, 1998. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Michael. 2001. The clitic -uva (< of a). American Speech 76.219–21.10.1215/00031283-76-2-219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Short, T. L. 2007. Peirce's theory of signs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511498350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster's Third New International Dictionary of the English Language Unabridged. 1991. 3rd edn. Springfield, MA: Merriam.Google Scholar
Wimsatt, William K. 1954. The verbal icon: Studies in the meaning of poetry. Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.Google Scholar