Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 April 2026
With regard to the vowel of the final syllable, Hesychius offers a gloss K
· ‘E
‘H
, and on this basis some modern scholars distinguish a god Kandaulas and a king Kandaules. I think that the validity of this distinction may be doubted. Hipponax’ vocative K
is the proper form to K
, cf.
. So Hesychius, if his copyists are not at fault, has either formed the nominative wrongly from K
or drawn on a non-Ionic source. For Ionic we need reckon with K
and with nothing else.
1 Prehn in PW 10.1860, Solmsen, to some extent Kretschmer.
2 The meter does not reveal the quantity of the final vowel.
3 Even Tzetzes:
.
4 The implicit interpretation of 'A
at so early a date is interesting and in agreement with Kretschmer's conclusions about the etymology, cf. Glotta 10.45–9 (1919).
5 Cf. B.V. Head, Brit. Mus. Excav. at Ephesos 91.
6 JHS 21.163 (1901).
7 FGrHist 90 F 47 (Jacoby).
8 RhM 35.5172(1880).
9 JHS 46.36–41 (1926)
10 Note 9.
11 Hermes 18.430.
12 Cf. Lambertz, Glotta 6.17 (1914); Sturtevant, Language 1.77 (1925) for the principle involved.
13 Kretschmer, Einl. 388–9 (1896); Hirt, Idg. 134–5, 599; Solmsen, KZ 34.77–80 (1897); 45.97–8 (1912); Herm. 46.286–91 (1911); Boisacq 541 (s.v.
).
14 Cf. Brugmann 2.1.94.
15 Ib. 101–2.
16 On canis, cf. Kent, Language 2.186–7 (1926).