Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T04:59:20.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Language and Memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Wallace L. Chafe
Wallace L. Chafe*
Affiliation:
University of California, Berkeley
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Linguistic and psychological concerns are seen to converge in the area of semantics in such a way as to suggest the value, for both disciplines, of ‘psychosemantic’ studies. This paper illustrates some of the possibilities by providing linguistic evidence for three kinds of memory, called surface, shallow, and deep. The evidence deals with the occurrence of temporal adverbs in English and with their intonation and order, as well as with the non-generic perfective. A classification of memory by psychologists into sensory, primary (short-term), and secondary (long-term) is discussed, and is seen to coincide only in part with—though not to conflict with—the linguistically motivated classification. The relevance of memory to the use of tenses is briefly explored, and it is observed that the tripartite classification of memory is mirrored in our concept of the future.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , June 1973 , pp. 261 - 281
Copyright
Copyright © Linguistic Society of America 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adams, Jack A. 1967. Human memory. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Blumenthal, Arthur L. 1970. Language and psychology: historical aspects of psycholinguistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Chafe, Wallace L. 1970. Meaning and the structure of language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Fraisse, Paul. 1963. The psychology of time. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, Sam, and Cowen, George N. Jr. 1970. Memory for non-attended auditory material. Cognitive Psychology 1.149–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groethuysen, B. 1935-36. De quelques aspects du temps: notes pour une phénoménologie du récit. Recherches Philosophiques 5.139–195.Google Scholar
James, William. 1890. The principles of psychology. 2 vols. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Kintsch, Walter. 1970. Learning, memory, and conceptual processes. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Milner, Brenda. 1959. The memory defect in bilateral hippocampal lesions. Psychiatric Research Reports 11.43–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Norman, Donald A. 1969. Memory and attention: an introduction to human information processing. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Parks, Douglas R. 1972. Pawnee grammar. University of California, Berkeley, dissertation.Google Scholar
Penfield, Wilder. 1959. The interpretive cortex. Science 129.1719–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, Lloyd R., and Peterson, Margaret J. 1959. Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology 58.193–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribot, Théodule. 1882. Diseases of memory. London: K. Paul, Trench.Google Scholar
Sperling, George. 1960. The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychological monographs 7411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar