Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-ghqh7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-14T16:02:48.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Length as A Suprasegmental: Evidence from Speech Errors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2026

Joseph Paul Stemberger
Joseph Paul Stemberger*
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Segmental length can be analysed in one of three possible ways: as a segmental feature, as gemination, or as a suprasegmental. These three analyses make different predictions about how length should behave in language production. Treating length as a suprasegmental predicts that it will frequently be dissociated from a segment, while the other analyses predict it will usually not be. Speech error corpora in German, Swedish, and English are examined. The data suggest a suprasegmental analysis, most probably along the lines of recent autosegmental descriptions: long segments are associated with two positions in the syllable structure. A vowel and its associated structure show different degrees of cohesiveness in different languages, so that they behave quite differently in errors in the different languages.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Language , Volume 60 , Issue 4 , December 1984 , pp. 895 - 913
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Linguistic Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Becker, Donald A. 1979. Speech error evidence for autosegmental levels. LI 10. 165–7.Google Scholar
Cairns, Charles E., and Feinstein, Mark H. 1982. Markedness and the theory of syllable structure. LI 13. 193–225.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam, and Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, George N., and Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1983. CV phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, Anne. 1981. The reliability of speech error data. Linguistics 19. 561–82.Google Scholar
Denes, Peter B. 1963. On the statistics of spoken English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35. 892–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Èliasson, Stig, and LaPelle, Nancy. 1973. Generativa regier för svenskans kvantitet. Arkiv för Nordisk Filologi 88. 133–48.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria. 1971. The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Lg. 47.27–52.Google Scholar
Fromkin, Victoria. 1973 (ed.) Speech errors as linguistic evidence. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Osamu, and Lovins, Julie. 1978. Syllables as concatenative phonetic units. Segments and syllables, ed. by Bell, Alan & Hooper, Joan B., 107–20. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Garrett, Merrill F. 1980. Levels of processing in sentence production. Language production, vol. 1, ed. by Butterworth, Brian, 177–220. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John. 1976. Autosegmental phonology. MIT dissertation. (Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.)Google Scholar
Hadding, Kerstin, Hirano, Minoru; and Smith, Timothy. 1969. Electromyographic study of lip activity in Swedish CV:C and CVC: syllables. Lund University Phonetics Laboratory Working Papers 1. 1–8.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1977. Tenseness, vowel shift, and the phonology of the back vowels in Modern English. LI 8. 611–25.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris, and Vergnaud, Jean-Roger. 1980. Three-dimensional phonology. Journal of Linguistic Research 1. 83–105.Google Scholar
Humbert, Jean-Marie. 1973. Speaking backwards in Bakwiri. Studies in African Linguistics 4. 227–36.Google Scholar
Leben, William. 1980. A metrical analysis of length. LI 11. 497–509.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1964. Acoustical characteristics of selected English consonants. Bloomington: Indiana University Research Center in Anthropology, Folklore, and Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse, Morton, Katherine; and Tatham, Marcel A. 1973. An instrumental study of consonant gemination. Journal of Phonetics 1. 131–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, John J. 1981. A prosodie theory of non-concatenative morphology. LI 12. 373–418.Google Scholar
MacKay, Donald. 1972. The structure of words and syllables: Evidence from errors in speech. Cognitive Psychology 3. 210–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meringer, Rudolf. 1908. Aus dem Leben der Sprache. Berlin: Behr.Google Scholar
Meringer, Rudolf, and Mayer, Carl. 1895. Versprechen und Verlesen. Stuttgart: Göschen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nooteboom, Sieb. 1969. The tongue slips into patterns. Nomen: Leyden studies in linguistics and phonetics, ed. by Sciarone, A. G. et al., 114–32. [Reprinted in Fromkin 1973:144–56.]Google Scholar
Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, and Klatt, Dennis. 1979. The limited use of distinctive features and markedness in speech production: Evidence from speech errors. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18. 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderpalm, Eva. 1979. Speech errors in normal and pathological speech. (Travaux de l'Institut de Linguistique de Lund, 14.) Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph Paul. 1982. The nature of segments in the lexicon: Evidence from speech errors. Lingua 56. 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph Paul. 1983a. The nature of /r/ and /l/ in English: Evidence from speech errors. Journal of Phonetics 11. 139–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph Paul. 1983b. Speech errors and theoretical phonology: A review. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Stemberger, Joseph Paul. 1984. Speech error collection and fieldwork: Some Choctaw speech errors. IJAL 50. 345–9.Google Scholar
Treiman, Rebecca. 1983. On the status of final consonant clusters in English syllables. To appear, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1976. Underlying tone in Margi and Igbo. LI 7. 463–84.Google Scholar
Witting, Claes. 1977. Studies in Swedish generative phonology. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar